SEC Company Response from REPUBLIC FIRST BANCORP INC (FRBK, FRBKQ) (CIK 0000834285) — Oct 14, 2005
REPUBLIC FIRST BANCORP INC (FRBK, FRBKQ) (CIK 0000834285)
Date: Oct. 14, 2005 · CIK: 0000834285 · Accession: 0000950159-05-001158
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 000-17007
Referenced dates: September 13, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Rebublic First Bancorp Correspondence
October
3, 2005
VIA
EDGAR AND FACSIMILE
Mr.
Brian Cascio
Accounting
Branch Chief
United
States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division
of Corporation Finance
450
Fifth Street, N.W.
Mail
Stop 6010
Washington,
DC 20549-6010
Re:
Republic
First Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company")
Form
10-K
for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Filed
March 30, 2005
File
No. 000-17007
Dear
Mr.
Cascio:
After
consultation with our prior independent registered public accountants, Grant
Thornton LLP, this letter supersedes our initial response letter dated September
13, 2005. This letter responds to the comment in your letter to the Company
dated August 29, 2005. The comment in your letter relates to the Company’s Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as identified in the caption
above.
We
have
the following response to your comment.
Form
10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Financial
Statements, page 45
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, page 46
1.
We
note the reference to the separate report of Grant Thornton dated
March
24, 2005 which expressed an unqualified opinion on management's assertion
that Republic First Bancorp, Inc. maintained effected internal control
over financial reporting. Please revise your Form 10-K to include
a copy
of this report.
Response:
The
Company is not an accelerated filer and therefore, was not subject to Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. However, the Company was required to
obtain an audit opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting under 12CFR Part 363.3(b) as part of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA).
Mr.
Brian
Cascio
United
States Securities and Exchange Commission
October
3, 2005
Page
2
Our
prior
independent registered public accountants perform an audit of internal control
under the interim standards adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (“PCAOB”) (AT 501) and issued their opinion on the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting for the Company. The audit of internal
control was not performed in accordance with PCAOB Auditing Standards No. 2.
Because
not all issuers are required to have an audit of internal control, we understand
that many auditing firms, including our prior independent registered public
accountants, included an explanatory paragraph to communicate whether an audit
of internal control was or was not performed, and if performed., the relevant
standards followed in performing the audit. This was the objective of our prior
independent registered public accountants in the explanatory paragraph included
in the Company’s audit report.
Because
the Company is currently not an accelerated filer (and therefore not subject
to
Section 404) and the language included in the auditor’s report as it relates to
the Company is not misleading, inaccurate or inconsistent, we do not believe
that an amendment to the Form 10-K to include a copy of the auditor’s report on
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as part of FDICIA
is warranted.
We
trust
that the above fully responds to your comment. If you have any additional
questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call me at (215) 735-4422.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
REPUBLIC
FIRST BANCORP, INC.
/s/
Paul
Frenkiel
Executive
Vice President and
Chief
Financial Officer
cc:
Harry
D. Madonna
Jason M. Shargel, Esquire
David Burns