SEC Company Response from Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (SYBT) (CIK 0000835324) (SYBT) — Jun 15, 2009
Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (SYBT) (CIK 0000835324)
Date: June 15, 2009 · CIK: 0000835324 · Accession: 0000892303-09-000065
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-13661
Referenced dates: June 10, 2009, May 26, 2009
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
S. Y. Bancorp, Inc. - Response to June 10, 2009 Comment Letter
S. Y. BANCORP,
INC.
1040 East Main
Street
Louisville,
Kentucky 40206
June 15, 2009
Ms. Kathryn McHale
Mail Stop 4561
Division of Corporation Finance
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re: S.Y. Bancorp, Inc.
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
Form 8-K furnished April 22, 2009
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
File No. 001-13661
Dear Ms. McHale:
We are responding to your letter dated June 10, 2009
regarding your review of our response to your comment letter. Our reply follows.
In accordance with your request, our response keys to your comments.
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
Item 11. Executive Compensation, page 79
Specific Elements of Compensation and How Performance
Impacts Each, page 13 of Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
We note your response to comment
1 in our letter dated May 26, 2009. We also note that you disclose the threshold
performance targets for the annual cash incentive awards for three of your named
executive officers, and in prior years you disclosed the entire range of
performance targets for these three officers. Please tell us why your
competitive harm argument is applicable to Messrs. Hillebrand and Poindexter and
not the other named executive officers. Please also tell us the basis for your
decision to report only the threshold targets for the other three named
executive officers, rather than the entire range of performance targets as
disclosed in prior years.
Response:
As disclosed in the 2009 proxy
statement (page 13) the performance target for the CEO and non-line of business
EVPs for 2008 was based on the Company achieving EPS growth over 2007 of at
least 3%. For 2008 as compared to 2007 the Company did not have an increase in
EPS. Accordingly, the CEO did not receive a cash bonus and Ms. Davis did not
receive a formula bonus. Also as disclosed for Ms. Thompson to have received a
bonus for 2008 her departmental income must have increased at least 10%. It did
not. Accordingly, she received no bonus. With these named executive officers not
eligible for any 2008 bonus, we concluded the entire range of performance
targets for these officers as had been provided in prior years was irrelevant to
the discussion of annual cash incentives in this year's proxy statement.
For the three named executive
officers discussed above, performance targets relate to Company or departmental
profitability and therefore involve publicly disclosed or non sensitive
information. To disclose line of business performance targets for Messrs.
Hillebrand and Poindexter would cause competitive harm as this information is
typically not publicly disclosed. To disclose the extent to which their lines of
business must produce loan and deposit growth, fee income, customer retention
and satisfaction and acquisition of new business would provide competitors with
access to information which would allow them to develop more attractive
compensation packages for our key line of business executives. Competitors could
derive a better understanding of the compensation structure of these lines of
business and the likelihood that the Company will be able to pay annual bonuses
to these executive officers. Such knowledge would enable the Company's
competitors to attract the Company's key line of business personnel away from
the Company. The Company's competitors could also use the knowledge to structure
their compensation and bonus programs in such a way as to more effectively
compete against the Company for talent in the workforce going forward. As noted
in the proxy statement, the performance targets are aggressive and considered
relatively difficult to achieve. This increases the risk of potential harm from
a competitor who might offer a more lucrative incentive arrangement with more
easily attainable goals.
Should you have additional comments after reviewing our
response, please let us know and we will address those promptly.
Very truly yours,
S.Y. Bancorp, Inc.
Nancy B. Davis
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer