SEC Company Response from TETRA TECHNOLOGIES (TTI) — Sep 24, 2007
TETRA TECHNOLOGIES INC
Date: Sept. 24, 2007 · CIK: 0000844965 · Accession: 0000844965-07-000041
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Response to Comment Letter
MEMORANDUM
FORM
10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
Contractual
Obligations and Other Commitments, page 40
1. In future filings
please revise the tabular disclosure to include the estimated interest payments
on long-term debt in the table or as a supplemental footnote. See Item 303(a)
(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K and Section IV of SEC Release 33-8350.
Response:
In future filings,
the Company will revise its tabular disclosure of contractual obligations
and other commitments to include the estimated interest payments on long-term
debt.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets, page F-4
2. If you continue
to present restricted cash please include a policy note disclosing the nature
of the restriction and intended purpose for the funds. We notice there is
relatively little change in the balances presented. If the funds are not intended
to be used in the near term we would expect them to be excluded from current
assets. See footnote 1 in paragraph 6 of Chapter 3 of ARB 43.
Response:
The restricted cash
currently reflected on the Company’s balance sheets consists of funds
related to a third party’s proportionate obligation in the plugging
and abandonment of a particular oil and gas property operated by the Company’s
Maritech Resources, Inc. (Maritech) subsidiary. This cash will remain restricted
until such time as the associated plugging and abandonment project is completed.
The associated liability for this plugging and abandonment project is included
in current liabilities, as the work was estimated to be performed during 2007.
In future filings, to the extent the Company has restricted cash which has
yet to be applied to the completed plugging and abandonment project, the Company
will include as part of its Significant Accounting Policies footnote a description
of the purpose of the restricted cash and the nature of the restriction. The
Company will also continue to classify such restricted cash as either current
or long-term asset as appropriate based upon the timing of the Company’s
expected usage of such restricted cash.
1
Consolidated
Statement of Operations, page F-6
3. Please tell us
whether your rental revenues exceeded 10% of total revenues. See Regulation
S-X Rule 5-03.01.
Response:
For the year ended
December 31, 2006, rental revenues amounted to approximately 6.97% of total
consolidated revenues. The Company will continue to monitor the level of rental
revenues in the future and its compliance with Rule 5-03(b).
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, page F-9
Gas
Balancing, page F-12
4. If the receivable
is recorded under the entitlement method please disclose if it is valued at
the lower of: (a) the price in effect at the time of production, (b) current
market price, or (c) if applicable, contract price.
Response:
The
Company’s gas balancing receivables are associated with its Maritech
subsidiary, which acquires mature oil and gas producing properties. Accordingly,
gas balancing receivables generally represent balancing positions associated
with acquired properties, and are initially valued at fair value based on
expected actual future cash flows to be received. Changes in gas balancing
receivables are recorded based on volumes over- or underproduced compared
to Maritech’s entitled share, and are valued at the lower of the price
in effect at time of production, current market price, or contract price,
if applicable. In future filings, the Company proposes to revise its existing
disclosure as follows:
Gas
Balancing
As part of its acquisitions of producing properties, Maritech has acquired
gas balancing receivables and payables related to certain properties. Maritech
allocates value for any acquired gas balancing positions using estimated amounts
expected to be received or paid in the future. Amounts related to under-produced
volume positions acquired are reflected as assets and amounts related to overproduced
volume positions acquired are reflected as liabilities. At December 31, 2006
and 2005, the Company reflected a gas balancing receivable of $3.3 million
and $3.2 million, respectively, in accounts receivable or other long-term
assets and a gas balancing payable of $6.9 million and $3.1 million, respectively,
in accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities. Following the acquisition
of a property, Maritech accounts for gas sales revenue from such property
based on its entitled share of total monthly production, with any monthly
over- or under-production taken as an adjustment to the gas balancing receivable
or payable, valued at the lower of the price in effect at time of production,
current market price, or contract price, if applicable.
2
Environmental
Liabilities, page F-14
5. You disclose that
you accrue loss estimates when both criteria in paragraph 8 of SFAS No. 5
are met. You do not address your policy with respect to disclosure of losses
in excess of amounts recorded when there is a reasonable possibility that
additional loss may have been incurred. See paragraphs 13 through 16 of SOP
94-6. Please expand your policy to include this as well as disclose the underlying
judgments and assumptions considered by management when assessing the measurement
and recognition of recorded and unrecorded environmental remediation liabilities.
See the bullet points in Question 2 to SAB Topic 5Y. Please include an example
of your revised disclosures in your response.
Response:
The
Company has reviewed and given due consideration of the disclosure provisions
of paragraph 8 of SFAS No. 5, paragraphs 13 through 16 of AICPA SOP 94-6,
and Question 2 to SAB Topic 5Y. Set forth below are the Company’s proposed
revisions to its Significant
Accounting Policy footnote discussion of environmental liabilities. With respect
to the judgments and assumptions considered by management when assessing the
measurement and recognition of recorded and unrecorded environmental remediation
liabilities, the revised disclosure reflects the material factors which are
considered relevant to the Company’s circumstances. Please also refer
to Note J – Commitments and Contingencies on page F-27 of its Form 10-K,
which includes a more specific discussion of the Company’s existing
environmental liability, in which the range of reasonably possible future
costs is disclosed. In light of this additional disclosure in Note J, and
the low materiality level of the Company’s possible environmental exposure,
the Company respectfully requests that the revised disclosure below be incorporated
into future filings, beginning with its September 30, 2007 Form 10-Q, rather
than amending its previous Form 10-K.
Environmental
Liabilities
Environmental expenditures which result in additions to property and equipment
are capitalized, while other environmental expenditures are expensed. Environmental
remediation liabilities are recorded on an undiscounted basis when environmental
assessments or cleanups are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.
Estimates of future environmental remediation expenditures often consist
of a range of possible expenditure amounts, a portion of which may be in excess
of amounts of liabilities recorded. In this instance, the Company discloses
the full range of amounts reasonably possible of being incurred. Any changes
or developments in environmental remediation efforts are accounted for and
disclosed each quarter as they occur. These costs are adjusted as further
information develops or circumstances change. Any recoveries of environmental
remediation costs from other parties are recorded as assets when their receipt
is deemed probable.
Complexities involving environmental remediation efforts can cause the
estimates of the associated liability to be imprecise. Factors which cause
uncertainties regarding the estimation of future expenditures include, but
are not limited to, the effectiveness of the anticipated work plans in achieving
targeted results and changes in the desired remediation methods and outcomes
as prescribed by regulatory agencies. Uncertainties associated with environmental
remediation contingencies are pervasive and often result in wide ranges of
reasonably possible outcomes. Estimates developed in the early stages of remediation
can vary significantly. Normally, a finite estimate of cost does not become
fixed and determinable at a specific point in time. Rather, the costs associated
with environmental
3
remediation become estimable as the work is performed and
the range of ultimate cost becomes more defined. It is possible that cash
flows and results of operations could be materially affected by the impact
of the ultimate resolution of these contingencies.
Revenue Recognition, page F-14
6. We note
that you recognize revenues based upon the percentage of completion method.
Please provide the disclosures required by Regulation S-X Rule 5-02.3(c).
Response:
Revenues
recognized under the percentage of completion method of accounting are related
to certain turnkey contracts of the Company’s well abandonment and decommissioning
businesses, which generally consist of short-term projects of two to three
months in length. Accounts receivable from accrued percentage of completion
revenues totaled approximately $8,617,000 as of December 31, 2006, or approximately
3.54% of consolidated receivables (1.10% of consolidated revenues). The Company
did not consider the foregoing amount to be material and accordingly did not
include the disclosures
under Rule 5-02.3(c). Such accrued amounts are generally not billable to the
customer until such time as the project is completed.
In future
filings, in the event accrued percentage of completion revenues are material,
the Company will include a revised disclosure similar to the following:
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized when finished products are shipped or services have
been provided to unaffiliated customers and only when collectibility is reasonably
assured. Sales terms for the Company’s products are FOB shipping point,
with title transferring at the point of shipment. Revenue is recognized at
the point of transfer of title. The Company recognizes oil and gas revenues
from its interests in producing wells as oil and natural gas is produced and
sold from those wells and includes such revenues in product sales revenues.
Oil and natural gas sold is not significantly different from the Company’s
share of production.
With regard to turnkey contracts, revenues are recognized on the percentage-of-completion
method based on the ratio of costs incurred to total estimated costs at completion.
Total project revenue and cost estimates for turnkey contracts are reviewed
periodically as work progresses, and adjustments are reflected in the period
in which such estimates are revised. Provisions for estimated losses on such
contracts are made in the period such losses are determined. As of December
31, 2006, accrued and unbilled revenues pursuant to turnkey contracts accounted
for under the percentage-of-completion method and included in accounts receivable
totaled $8.6 million. All of these amounts included in accounts receivable
are expected to be collected within one year. A portion of the Company’s
well abandonment and decommissioning services operations are provided pursuant
to turnkey contracts, and generally such projects are completed within six
months of inception. Revenues are generally not billable to customers until
after each project is completed.
Note
D – Acquisitions and Dispositions, page F-18
7. We note
that you have not provided pro forma information with respect to your acquisitions
that you closed in the most recent fiscal year. Please confirm to us that
the
4
pro forma results of operations for 2006 would not have been materially
different from actual historical results of operations. See SFAS 141 paragraph
54.
Response:
The Company’s
two most significant acquisitions during 2006 were consummated during the
first quarter of the year. Accordingly, pro forma results of operations, assuming
all acquisitions were consummated as of January 1, 2006, would not be materially
different (less than 2% increase in net income) from actual results.
5