SEC Company Response from MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC (MHK) (CIK 0000851968) (MHK) — Aug 16, 2007
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC (MHK) (CIK 0000851968)
Date: Aug. 16, 2007 · CIK: 0000851968 · Accession: 0000851968-07-000052
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: August 2, 2007
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Alston&Bird
LLP
One Atlantic Center
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424
404-881-7000
Fax: 404-881-7777
www.alston.com
R. David Patton Direct
Dial: 404-881-7951 E-mail: dave.patton@alston.com
August 16, 2007
Mr. James Allegretto
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re:
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006, Filed
February 26, 2007
Forms 10-Q for Fiscal Quarters Ended March 31, 2007 and
June 30, 2007,
Filed May 10, 2007 and August 1, 2007
File No. 1-13697
Dear Mr. Allegretto:
In connection with the review by the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the above referenced filings of Mohawk
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") set forth below are the Company's responses to
the Staff's comments contained in the letter dated August 2, 2007 to Frank H.
Boykin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
Form 10-K for the Fiscal year Ended
December 31, 2006
Business
General, page 3
In
future filings, please expand your discussion to provide the information
required under Item 101(c)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K pertaining to your principal
products for each of the last three fiscal years.
Response: The Company has three
categories of similar products accounting for 10% or more of consolidated
revenue in the last three fiscal years. These three categories are:
(1) Soft surface, which includes carpets, rugs, carpet pad and resilient;
(2) Tile, which includes ceramic tile, porcelain tile and natural stone;
and (3) Wood, which includes laminate, hardwood, roofing panels and
wood-based panels. In response to this comment, the Company will include
disclosure required under Item 101(c)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K for these three
categories in future filings.
Bank of
America Plaza
101
South Tryon Street, Suite 4000
Charlotte,
NC 28280-4000
704-444-1000
Fax:
704-444-1111
90 Park
Avenue
New
York, NY 10016
212-210-9400
Fax:
212-210-9444
3201
Beechleaf Court, Suite 600
Raleigh,
NC 27604-1062
919-862-2200
Fax:
919-862-2260
The
Atlantic Building
950 F
Street, NW
Washington,
DC 20004-1404
202-756-3300
Fax:
202-756-3333
Mr. James Allegretto
August 16, 2007
Page 2
Income Taxes, page 59
Please provide us with a description of the nature of the "Belgium Notional
interest" reconciling item included in the tabular presentation at page 60 of
the differences between the amounts of income tax expense attributable to
earnings before income taxes and the amounts computed by applying the U.S.
statutory federal income tax rate to earnings before income taxes.
Response: Effective for tax years
beginning in 2006, Belgian tax law permits a corporate tax deduction based on a
Belgian company's equity multiplied by a published government interest rate.
The Belgium Notional Interest reconciling item included on page 60 quantifies
the Company's consolidated deduction pursuant to these provisions.
Commitment and
Contingencies, page 62
We
note your disclosure that you believe that "adequate provisions for resolution
of all claims and pending litigation have been made for probable losses and
that the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse
effect on [your] financial condition but could have a material effect on [your]
results of operations in a given quarter or annual period." Particularly with
regard to the legal proceeding you cite as material, please expand your
discussion to disclose the amounts of reserves you have recorded. Also ensure
that you have provided all applicable disclosures under paragraphs 8-10 of SFAS
5 including an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss or a statement
that such an estimate cannot be made.
Response: The Company believes that
it has properly accrued for the Williams case pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 5 ("SFAS No. 5") and provided the
disclosures required by SFAS No. 5. As required by paragraph 8 of SFAS No. 5,
the Company has accrued a reasonable estimate of the probable loss pursuant to
the Williams case. Pursuant to paragraph 9 of SFAS No. 5, the Company's
management believes that disclosure of the specific amount of the accrual the
Company has made pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 5 is not necessary for
the Company's consolidated financial statements not to be misleading. Further,
the Company respectfully submits that disclosure of the specific amount of the
accrual will impair the Company's ability to effectively defend itself and minimize
the amount of any loss in the Williams case. As the Company continues to
vigorously defend itself against this action, it will continue to evaluate the
likelihood of an additional loss in excess of the amount accrued to date for
the Williams case and, to the extent an additional significant loss becomes
reasonably possible, will provide the disclosures required by paragraph 10 of SFAS
No. 5.
Mr. James Allegretto
August 16, 2007
Page 3
Controls and Procedures,
page 67
We note your statement that management does not expect
that "[your] disclosure controls and procedures or your internal control
over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met." Please confirm, if true, that your controls and
procedures were designed at the reasonable assurance level and that your
principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that
your disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable
assurance level. If so, please revise your disclosure accordingly in
future filings. In the alternative, remove the reference to the level of
assurance of your disclosure controls and procedures included in your current
disclosure. Please refer to Section II.F.4 of Management's Reports on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure
in Exchange Act Reports, SEC Release No. 33-8238, available on our website
at http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8238.htm
Response: The language quoted by
the Staff in its comment and contained in the Company's Form 10-K is intended
to educate the reader as to the limitations inherent in any company's
disclosure controls and procedures. We respectfully submit that the process
undertaken by the Company and its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer meets the applicable legal requirements and guidance relating to the
evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company hereby confirms
that its controls and procedures were designed at the reasonable assurance
level and its principal executive officer and principal financial officer
concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the
reasonable assurance level. The Company will revise its disclosure in future
filings to make it clear that its disclosure controls and procedures were
designed to provide "reasonable assurance . . ." as requested by the
Staff.
In connection with these responses to the
Staff's comments, the Company acknowledges that:
• the
Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the
filing;
• Staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and
• the
Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated
by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United
States.
Mr. James Allegretto
August 16, 2007
Page 4
Thank
you for your consideration of the Company's responses to the Staff's comments
and we appreciate your review and assistance. If you have any questions
regarding these responses, please do not hesitate to call the undersigned
(404-881-7951) or James T. Lucke, General Counsel of Mohawk (706) 624-2660.
Very truly yours,
/s/: R. David Patton
R. David
Patton
cc:
Regina Balderas
(Securities and Exchange Commission)
Frank H. Boykin (Mohawk
Industries, Inc.)
James T. Lucke (Mohawk
Industries, Inc.)