SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from FIRST COMMUNITY BANKSHARES (FCBC) — Nov 13, 2009

FIRST COMMUNITY BANKSHARES INC /VA/ (FCBC) (CIK 0000859070)
Date: Nov. 13, 2009 · CIK: 0000859070 · Accession: 0001144204-09-059082

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 000-19297

Referenced dates: June 23, 2009

Date
June 30, 2009
Author
Not clearly detected
Form
CORRESP
Company
FIRST COMMUNITY BANKSHARES INC /VA/ (FCBC) (CIK 0000859070)

Letter

Via EDGAR Division of Corporation Finance Re: First Community Bancshares, Inc. Form 10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 File No. 000-19297

Dear Ms. Connell:

This letter is provided on behalf of First Community Bancshares, Inc. (“First Community,” the “Company,” “we,” or “our”) in response to your letter of October 7, 2009, regarding the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009.

The Company acknowledges that:

·

The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the referenced filings;

·

Staff comments or changes to disclosures in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) from taking any action with respect to the referenced filings; and

·

The Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

For your convenience, we have included in this letter, in bold, each of the comments in your letter; our responses follow.

Form 10-Q for Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2009

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

General

1.

Please revise your future quarterly filings to provide the disclosures required by paragraph 20(a) of SFAS 114. Please note that such disclosures are required as of each balance sheet date, including quarterly periods.

Beginning with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we have provided the disclosures required by paragraph 20(a) of SFAS 114. The following disclosure was included in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.

The following table presents the Company’s investment in loans considered to be impaired and related information on those impaired loans for the periods ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

P.O. Box 989 □ One Community Place □ Bluefield, VA 24605 □ Telephone: 276-326-9000 □ Fax: 276-326-9010 □ www.fcbinc.com

Ms. Angela Connell

November 13, 2009

Page

September 30,

December 31,

(In Thousands)

Recorded investment in loans considered to be impaired:

Impaired loans with reserves

$ 4,231

$ 4,796

Impaired loans without reserves

10,559

8,504

Total impaired loans

14,790

13,300

Allowance for loan losses related to loans considered to be impaired

1,221

Interest income recognized on impaired loans, year to date

Impaired loans without reserves at September 30, 2009, include $4.24 million of acquired loans with credit deterioration. Interest income realized on impaired loans is recognized upon receipt if the impaired loan is on a non-accrual basis.

Note 3. Investment Securities, pages 14-15

2.

In your response to comment 17 of our letter dated June 23, 2009 you stated that you would add a column to your investment tables disclosing the amount of OTTI recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. It does not appear that you have included this required disclosure in your June 30, 2009 Form 10-Q. Accordingly, please revise your future filings to include this disclosure as required by paragraph 19 of SFAS 115 as amended by FSP FAS 115-2 and 124-2.

We included the amount of OTTI recognized in AOCI, as required by paragraph 19 of SFAS 115, as amended, in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The following disclosure was included in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.

Ms. Angela Connell

November 13, 2009

Page

As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities were as follows:

September 30, 2009

Amortized

Unrealized

Unrealized

Fair

OTTI in

Cost

Gains

Losses

Value

AOCI

(In Thousands)

U.S. Government agency securities

$ 66,191

$

$ -

$ 66,888

$ -

States and political subdivisions

134,885

4,092

(481 )

138,496

-

Trust preferred securities:

Single issue

55,586

-

(18,132 )

37,454

-

Pooled

60,116

-

(37,014 )

23,102

(31,862 )

Total trust preferred securities

115,702

-

(55,146 )

60,556

(31,862 )

Mortgage-backed securities:

Agency

284,092

6,875

(361 )

290,606

-

Non-Agency prime residential

6,166

-

(627 )

5,539

-

Non-Agency Alt-A residential

20,968

-

(9,437 )

11,531

(9,437 )

Total mortgage-backed securities

311,226

6,875

(10,425 )

307,676

(9,437 )

Equities

2,312

(336 )

2,184

-

Total

$ 630,316

$ 11,872

$ (66,388 )

$ 575,800

$ (41,299 )

December 31, 2008

Amortized

Unrealized

Unrealized

Fair

OTTI in

Cost

Gains

Losses

Value

AOCI

(In Thousands)

U.S. Government agency securities

$ 53,425

$ 1,393

$ -

$ 54,818

$ -

States and political subdivisions

163,042

(4,487 )

159,419

-

Trust preferred securities:

Single Issue

55,491

-

(21,950 )

33,541

-

Pooled

93,269

-

(60,757 )

32,512

-

Total trust preferred securities

148,760

-

(82,707 )

66,053

-

Mortgage-backed securities:

Agency

212,315

4,649

(2 )

216,962

-

Non-Agency prime residential

7,423

-

(1,657 )

5,766

-

Non-Agency Alt-A residential

10,750

-

-

10,750

-

Total mortgage-backed securities

230,488

4,649

(1,659 )

233,478

-

Equities

7,979

(1,381 )

6,955

-

Total

$ 603,694

$ 7,263

$ (90,234 )

$ 520,723

$ -

3.

Refer to comment 10 in our letter dated June 23, 2009. Regarding the cumulative effect adjustment related to the $15.5 million in other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charges recorded in 2008 on your pooled trust preferred securities, you state that you determined the entire amount of the impairment to be credit-related based on a review of the cash flow projections you used in your determination of whether or not there had been an adverse change in cash flow at December 31, 2008 and that you enhanced your assumptions to include a continuing element of defaults in addition to those projected. Please provide us additional specific details regarding how you enhanced your assumptions to include a continuing element of defaults in addition to those projected, tell us why you believe it was appropriate to revise your cash flow projections and provide us the authoritative guidance which you believe supports your methodology. It appears that paragraph 45 of FSP FAS 115-2 and 124-2 requires you to calculate the cumulative adjustment as of the beginning of the period in which you adopt the standard and therefore your calculations would be based on the unadjusted cash flows expected to be collected used in your adverse change in cash flow assessment at December 31, 2008.

Ms. Angela Connell

November 13, 2009

Page

At December 31, 2008, GAAP at that time, as prescribed by EITF 99-20 paragraph 12.b., was to determine if an adverse change in cash flows had occurred. Our initial cash flow projections for the SOLOSO 2007 security were based upon actual and projected specific defaults and deferrals for the underlying collateral, but no assumption for default of banks that were not specifically identified. This analysis indicated that a break in yield was present, and under then-current GAAP, further analysis or consideration of further projected defaults was unnecessary and was not performed at that time, as any adverse change in cash flow resulted in an immediate recognition of the entire unrealized loss as an other-than-temporary-impairment charge. Under the GAAP in effect as of the filing date of our Form 10-K, we appropriately recognized other-than-temporary impairment of $15.46 million, reducing the carrying value to approximately $2.94 million.

Upon the adoption of FSP 115-2 and 124-2, we reviewed our cash flow projections for the security as of December 31, 2008. We determined that we had an adverse change in cash flows at December 31, 2008, before we completed the full expected cash flow analysis that was consistent with our analysis for all of our other pooled trust preferred securities. At that time additional, consistent analysis would not have provided a different result, as any adverse change in cash flows would result in the same amount of impairment charge to be taken through the income statement. Our process at that time for all of our other pooled trust preferred securities was to add a continuing element of default of 75 basis points as a FAS 5 component to overlay the specifically known and projected defaults and deferrals. This represents our enhancement to the original cash flow analysis performed as of December 31, 2008, which we felt was prudent in order to determine whether or not there was reasonable justification for recording a cost basis in this security that was above fair value. We view it not as an enhancement, but a consistent application of our approach as of December 31, 2008.

In accordance with paragraph 25 of FSP 115-2, we considered other factors besides the discounted cash flow analysis that had an impact on our assessment of whether the recorded loss was credit related. As noted in paragraph 25.d., this security has certain structural issues that are different from our other holdings and that we believe add a greater degree of risk to the realization of projected cash flows. For example, this security has a collateral manager that can swap collateral within the structure without the approval of the rated security holders. The collateral manager is able to replace unrated trust preferred and subordinate debt collateral within the deal with other more highly rated collateral. The replacement collateral, in all likelihood, will pay a lesser amount of periodic interest, thus decreasing the overall cash flows coming into the deal. This introduces an added element of risk and uncertainty to the realization of future cash flows.

Additionally, Like most other pooled trust preferred deals, the SLOSO has the ability to direct cash flow to the highest rated tranches and decrease the outstanding principal balance when certain overcollateralization tests are not met. Generally, the lower tranches receive a “payment-in-kind” when this occurs and the interest payment due is effectively capitalized into the principal amount of the tranche. This security was deferring interest payments, which remained contractually due, but the principal balance of t

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

    Unassociated Document

    November
13, 2009

    Via
EDGAR

    Ms.
Angela Connell

    Reviewing
Accountant

    Division
of Corporation Finance

    U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission

    100 F
Street, NW

    Washington,
D.C. 20549

    Mail Stop
4720

              Re:

              First
      Community Bancshares, Inc.

    Form
10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2009

    File
No. 000-19297

    Dear Ms.
Connell:

    This
letter is provided on behalf of First Community Bancshares, Inc. (“First
Community,” the “Company,” “we,” or “our”) in response to your letter of October
7, 2009, regarding the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2009.

    The
Company acknowledges that:

              ·

              The
      Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in
      the referenced filings;

              ·

              Staff
      comments or changes to disclosures in response to staff comments do not
      foreclose the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) from
      taking any action with respect to the referenced filings;
    and

              ·

              The
      Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding
      initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities
      laws of the United States.

    For your
convenience, we have included in this letter, in bold, each of the comments in
your letter; our responses follow.

    Form 10-Q for Fiscal Quarter
Ended June 30, 2009

    Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements

    General

              1.

              Please
      revise your future quarterly filings to provide the disclosures required
      by paragraph 20(a) of SFAS 114. Please note that such disclosures are
      required as of each balance sheet date, including quarterly
      periods.

    Beginning
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
we have provided the disclosures required by paragraph 20(a) of SFAS
114.  The following disclosure was included in the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.

    The
following table presents the Company’s investment in loans considered to be
impaired and related information on those impaired loans for the periods ended
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

          P.O. Box
989 □ One Community Place □ Bluefield, VA 24605 □ Telephone: 276-326-9000 □ Fax:
276-326-9010 □ www.fcbinc.com

    Ms.
Angela Connell

    November
13, 2009

    Page
2

                    September
      30,

                    December
      31,

                    (In
      Thousands)

                    2009

                    2008

                    Recorded
      investment in loans considered to be impaired:

                     Impaired
      loans with reserves

                  $
                  4,231

                  $
                  4,796

                     Impaired
      loans without reserves

                  10,559

                  8,504

                     Total
      impaired loans

                  14,790

                  13,300

                    Allowance
      for loan losses related to loans considered to be impaired

                  1,221

                  678

                    Interest
      income recognized on impaired loans, year to date

                  397

                  793

    Impaired
loans without reserves at September 30, 2009, include $4.24 million of acquired
loans with credit deterioration.  Interest income realized on impaired
loans is recognized upon receipt if the impaired loan is on a non-accrual
basis.

    Note 3. Investment
Securities, pages 14-15

              2.

              In
      your response to comment 17 of our letter dated June 23, 2009 you stated
      that you would add a column to your investment tables disclosing the
      amount of OTTI recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. It
      does not appear that you have included this required disclosure in your
      June 30, 2009 Form 10-Q. Accordingly, please revise your future filings to
      include this disclosure as required by paragraph 19 of SFAS 115 as amended
      by FSP FAS 115-2 and 124-2.

    We
included the amount of OTTI recognized in AOCI, as required by paragraph 19 of
SFAS 115, as amended, in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009.  The following disclosure was included in the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009.

    Ms.
Angela Connell

    November
13, 2009

    Page
3

    As of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the amortized cost and estimated fair
value of available-for-sale securities were as follows:

                      September
      30, 2009

                      Amortized

                      Unrealized

                      Unrealized

                      Fair

                      OTTI
      in

                      Cost

                      Gains

                      Losses

                      Value

                      AOCI

                      (In
      Thousands)

                      U.S.
      Government agency securities

                    $
                    66,191

                    $
                    697

                    $
                    -

                    $
                    66,888

                    $
                    -

                      States
      and political subdivisions

                    134,885

                    4,092

                    (481
                    )

                    138,496

                    -

                      Trust
      preferred securities:

                      Single
      issue

                    55,586

                    -

                    (18,132
                    )

                    37,454

                    -

                      Pooled

                    60,116

                    -

                    (37,014
                    )

                    23,102

                    (31,862
                    )

                      Total
      trust preferred securities

                    115,702

                    -

                    (55,146
                    )

                    60,556

                    (31,862
                    )

                      Mortgage-backed
      securities:

                      Agency

                    284,092

                    6,875

                    (361
                    )

                    290,606

                    -

                      Non-Agency
      prime residential

                    6,166

                    -

                    (627
                    )

                    5,539

                    -

                      Non-Agency
      Alt-A residential

                    20,968

                    -

                    (9,437
                    )

                    11,531

                    (9,437
                    )

                      Total
      mortgage-backed securities

                    311,226

                    6,875

                    (10,425
                    )

                    307,676

                    (9,437
                    )

                      Equities

                    2,312

                    208

                    (336
                    )

                    2,184

                    -

                      Total

                    $
                    630,316

                    $
                    11,872

                    $
                    (66,388
                    )

                    $
                    575,800

                    $
                    (41,299
                    )

                      December
      31, 2008

                      Amortized

                      Unrealized

                      Unrealized

                      Fair

                      OTTI
      in

                      Cost

                      Gains

                      Losses

                      Value

                      AOCI

                      (In
      Thousands)

                      U.S.
      Government agency securities

                    $
                    53,425

                    $
                    1,393

                    $
                    -

                    $
                    54,818

                    $
                    -

                      States
      and political subdivisions

                    163,042

                    864

                    (4,487
                    )

                    159,419

                    -

                      Trust
      preferred securities:

                      Single
      Issue

                    55,491

                    -

                    (21,950
                    )

                    33,541

                    -

                      Pooled

                    93,269

                    -

                    (60,757
                    )

                    32,512

                    -

                      Total
      trust preferred securities

                    148,760

                    -

                    (82,707
                    )

                    66,053

                    -

                      Mortgage-backed
      securities:

                      Agency

                    212,315

                    4,649

                    (2
                    )

                    216,962

                    -

                      Non-Agency
      prime residential

                    7,423

                    -

                    (1,657
                    )

                    5,766

                    -

                      Non-Agency
      Alt-A residential

                    10,750

                    -

                    -

                    10,750

                    -

                      Total
      mortgage-backed securities

                    230,488

                    4,649

                    (1,659
                    )

                    233,478

                    -

                      Equities

                    7,979

                    357

                    (1,381
                    )

                    6,955

                    -

                      Total

                    $
                    603,694

                    $
                    7,263

                    $
                    (90,234
                    )

                    $
                    520,723

                    $
                    -

              3.

              Refer
      to comment 10 in our letter dated June 23, 2009. Regarding the cumulative
      effect adjustment related to the $15.5 million in other-than-temporary
      impairment (“OTTI”) charges recorded in 2008 on your pooled trust
      preferred securities, you state that you determined the entire amount of
      the impairment to be credit-related based on a review of the cash flow
      projections you used in your determination of whether or not there had
      been an adverse change in cash flow at December 31, 2008 and that you
      enhanced your assumptions to include a continuing element of defaults in
      addition to those projected. Please provide us additional specific details
      regarding how you enhanced your assumptions to include a continuing
      element of defaults in addition to those projected, tell us why you
      believe it was appropriate to revise your cash flow projections and
      provide us the authoritative guidance which you believe supports your
      methodology. It appears that paragraph 45 of FSP FAS 115-2 and 124-2
      requires you to calculate the cumulative adjustment as of the beginning of
      the period in which you adopt the standard and therefore your calculations
      would be based on the unadjusted cash flows expected to be collected used
      in your adverse change in cash flow assessment at December 31,
      2008.

    Ms.
Angela Connell

    November
13, 2009

    Page
4

    At
December 31, 2008, GAAP at that time, as prescribed by EITF 99-20 paragraph
12.b., was to determine if an adverse change in cash flows had
occurred.  Our initial cash flow projections for the SOLOSO 2007
security were based upon actual and projected specific defaults and deferrals
for the underlying collateral, but no assumption for default of banks that were
not specifically identified.  This analysis indicated that a break in
yield was present, and under then-current GAAP, further analysis or
consideration of further projected defaults was unnecessary and was not
performed at that time, as any adverse change in cash flow resulted in an
immediate recognition of the entire unrealized loss as an
other-than-temporary-impairment charge.  Under the GAAP in effect as
of the filing date of our Form 10-K, we appropriately recognized
other-than-temporary impairment of $15.46 million, reducing the carrying value
to approximately $2.94 million.

    Upon the
adoption of FSP 115-2 and 124-2, we reviewed our cash flow projections for the
security as of December 31, 2008.  We determined that we had an
adverse change in cash flows at December 31, 2008, before we completed the full
expected cash flow analysis that was consistent with our analysis for all of our
other pooled trust preferred securities. At that time additional, consistent
analysis would not have provided a different result, as any adverse change in
cash flows would result in the same amount of impairment charge to be taken
through the income statement.  Our process at that time for all of our
other pooled trust preferred securities was to add a continuing element of
default of 75 basis points as a FAS 5 component to overlay the specifically
known and projected defaults and deferrals.  This represents our
enhancement to the original cash flow analysis performed as of December 31,
2008, which we felt was prudent in order to determine whether or not there was
reasonable justification for recording a cost basis in this security that was
above fair value.  We view it not as an enhancement, but a consistent
application of our approach as of December 31, 2008.

    In
accordance with paragraph 25 of FSP 115-2, we considered other factors besides
the discounted cash flow analysis that had an impact on our assessment of
whether the recorded loss was credit related.  As noted in paragraph
25.d., this security has certain structural issues that are different from our
other holdings and that we believe add a greater degree of risk to the
realization of projected cash flows.  For example, this security has a
collateral manager that can swap collateral within the structure without the
approval of the rated security holders.  The collateral manager is
able to replace unrated trust preferred and subordinate debt collateral within
the deal with other more highly rated collateral.  The replacement
collateral, in all likelihood, will pay a lesser amount of periodic interest,
thus decreasing the overall cash flows coming into the deal.  This
introduces an added element of risk and uncertainty to the realization of future
cash flows.

    Additionally,
Like most other pooled trust preferred deals, the SLOSO has the ability to
direct cash flow to the highest rated tranches and decrease the outstanding
principal balance when certain overcollateralization tests are not
met.  Generally, the lower tranches receive a “payment-in-kind” when
this occurs and the interest payment due is effectively capitalized into the
principal amount of the tranche.  This security was deferring interest
payments, which remained contractually due, but the principal balance of t