SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from RESTORATION HARDWARE INC (CIK 0000863821) — Sep 13, 2005

RESTORATION HARDWARE INC (CIK 0000863821)
Date: Sept. 13, 2005 · CIK: 0000863821 · Accession: 0001104659-05-043968

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: August 30, 2005

Date
September 13, 2005
Author
/s/ Murray
Form
CORRESP
Company
RESTORATION HARDWARE INC (CIK 0000863821)

Letter

United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005 Filed April 14, 2005 Form 8-K filed August 25, 2005 File No. 0-24261

Dear Mr. Choi,

This letter is in response to your letter dated August 30, 2005 (the “Comment Letter”) regarding the review by the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2005 (the “Form 8-K”) by Restoration Hardware, Inc. (the “Company”). The numbered paragraph set forth below corresponds to the numbered paragraph in the Comment Letter.

Item 9.01 Form 8-K filed August 25, 2005

1. We note that you present net results and operating results excluding non-cash store remodeling charges. These non-GAAP measures are subject to the prohibition, disclosure and reconciliation requirements in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. While there is no per se prohibition against adjusting non-GAAP performance measures to exclude recurring type items such as these, you must meet the burden of demonstrating the usefulness of any non-GAAP measures which exclude recurring items. In this regard, we note that you have recorded store remodeling charges since you launched a new merchandising strategy in April 2002. Therefore, it does not appear that eliminating the financial impact of these remodeling charges is appropriate given their recurring nature and you should avoid presenting these non-GAAP measures in future filings.

Response:

The Company understands the Staff’s position that a reporting company bears the burden of demonstrating the need for use of such a non-GAAP measure. Accordingly, based on the Staff’s current guidance on this issue as reflected in the comment letter, in future filings the Company will not provide similar non-GAAP financial measures to eliminate the financial impact on the Company’s net earnings or net operating results if the Company incurs similar charges related to store remodeling.

* * * *

If you have any further questions or require additional clarification, please contact me at 1-415-945-4618 or by email at mjukes@restorationhardware.com. Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,
/s/ Murray
Jukes

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

[Restoration Hardware Letterhead]

September 13, 2005

By EDGAR Transmission and

Overnight
Delivery

Mr. William Choi

Branch Chief

United States Securities and
Exchange Commission

100 F St. NE

Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:          Restoration Hardware,
Inc.

Form 10-K for
Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005

Filed April
14, 2005

Form 8-K filed
August 25, 2005

File No.
0-24261

Dear Mr. Choi,

This letter is in response to
your letter dated August 30, 2005 (the “Comment Letter”) regarding the review
by the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Form
8-K filed on August 25, 2005 (the “Form 8-K”) by Restoration Hardware, Inc. (the
“Company”).  The numbered paragraph set
forth below corresponds to the numbered paragraph in the Comment Letter.

Item 9.01
Form 8-K filed August 25, 2005

1.             We note that you present net results and operating
results excluding non-cash store remodeling charges. These non-GAAP measures
are subject to the prohibition, disclosure and reconciliation requirements in
Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. While there is no per se prohibition against
adjusting non-GAAP performance measures to exclude recurring type items such as
these, you must meet the burden of demonstrating the usefulness of any non-GAAP
measures which exclude recurring items. In this regard, we note that you have
recorded store remodeling charges since you launched a new merchandising
strategy in April 2002. Therefore, it does not appear that eliminating the
financial impact of these remodeling charges is appropriate given their
recurring nature and you should avoid presenting these non-GAAP measures in
future filings.

Response:

The Company
understands the Staff’s position that a reporting company bears the burden of
demonstrating the need for use of such a non-GAAP measure.  Accordingly, based on the Staff’s current
guidance on this issue as reflected in the comment letter, in future filings
the Company will not provide similar non-GAAP financial measures to eliminate
the financial impact on the Company’s net earnings or net operating results if
the Company incurs similar charges related to store remodeling.

*              *              *              *

If you have any further
questions or require additional clarification, please contact me at
1-415-945-4618 or by email at mjukes@restorationhardware.com.  Thank you for your assistance.

  Sincerely,

  /s/ Murray
  Jukes

  Murray Jukes

  Acting Chief
  Financial Officer

  Cc:

  Gavin B.
  Grover

  Morrison
  & Foerster LLP