SEC Company Response from ProPhase Labs, Inc. (PRPH) (CIK 0000868278) (PRPH) — Oct 15, 2009
ProPhase Labs, Inc. (PRPH) (CIK 0000868278)
Date: Oct. 15, 2009 · CIK: 0000868278 · Accession: 0001144204-09-053174
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 000-21617
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Unassociated Document
October
15, 2009
Jim B.
Rosenberg
Senior
Assistant Chief Accountant
United
States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F
Street, N.E.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
The
Quigley Corporation
Form
10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2008
Filed
March 9, 2009
Definitive
Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
Filed
April 2, 2009
File Number:
000-21617
Dear Mr.
Rosenberg:
On behalf
of The Quigley Corporation (the “Company”) we hereby transmit via EDGAR the
following responses to the Staff’s comment letter of October 5,
2009. To assist your review, we have retyped the text of the Staff’s
comments in bold face type.
Form
10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
Item 7, Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting
Estimates, page 27
1.
Please
refer to your revised proposed disclosures in response to prior comment
five. Please clarify what you mean by “non-routine” returns,
“obsolete” product and “product mix realignment” and address how these
items relate to the main components of the Company’s return policy for
which you will accept returns as disclosed in your proposed disclosure to
comment four. Please separately disclose the amount of the
increase in the 2008 return provision attributed to each of the
following: non-routine returns of obsolete product, product mix
realignment and returns or return reserves for new products of the company
which carry a shelf-life expiration
date.
Response:
The
Company does not impose a period of time within which product may be
returned. All requests for product returns must be submitted to the
Company for pre-approval. The main components of the Company’s
returns policy are: the Company will accept returns that are (i) due to damaged
product that is un-saleable and such return request activity fall within an
acceptable range, (ii) for products of the Company that have reached or exceeded
designated expiration dates, (iii) in the event that the Company discontinues a
product, the customer will have the right to return only such item that it
purchased directly from the Company. The Company will not accept
return requests pertaining to customer inventory “Overstocking” or
“Resets”. The Company will only accept return requests for
product in its intended package configuration. The Company reserves
the right to terminate shipment of product to customers who have made
unauthorized deductions contrary to the Company’s Return Policy or pursue other
methods of reimbursement. The Company compensates the customer for authorized
returns by means of a credit applied to amounts owed or to be owed and in the
case of discontinued product only, also by way of an exchange. The
Company does not have any significant product exchange history.
KELLS
BUILDING · 621 N.
Shady Retreat Road ·
PO Box1349 ·
Doylestown, PA 18901-1349 · U.S.A
Telephone:
215-345-0919 · Fax:
215-345-5920 · For
information: www.quigleyco.com
The
increase in the fiscal 2008 return provision was principally due to non-routine
returns, obsolete product and product mix realignment by certain of our
customers.
“Non-routine”
returns are defined as product returned to the Company as a consequence of
unanticipated circumstances principally due to (i) retail store closings or (ii)
unexpected poor retail sell through to consumers causing the Company to
discontinue the product.
“Obsolete”
returns are defined as product returned to the Company as a consequence of
product shelf-life “use by” expiration date.
“Product mix realignment”
returns are defined as product returned to the Company due to initiatives by the
trade to discontinue purchasing certain of the Company’s
products. Product mix realignment returns are generally nominal and
are frequently related to discontinued or soon to be discontinued
products.
The
Company’s return policy accommodates returns for (i) discontinued products, (ii)
store closings and (iii) products that have reached or exceeded designated
expiration date.
The
following is a summary of the change in the return provision for the year ended
December 31, 2008:
Return
provision at December 31, 2008
$
1,427,045
Return
provision at December 31, 2007
295,606
Increase
in the return provision at
December 31, 2008
$
1,131,439
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, the return provision increased by $1,131,439 to
$1,427,045. The return provision increase of $1,131,439 was principally due to
(i) an aggregate provision for returns of $586,528 attributable to new product
introductions as a consequence of (a) poor retail sell through to consumers
(resulting in non-routine returns) and (b) the decreasing shelf-life of the
products as expiration dates came due (resulting in obsolete returns), and (ii)
an aggregate provision for returns of $544,911 due principally to discontinued
product (resulting in non-routine returns).
We will
provide disclosure of the above-mentioned definitions in future filings, as well
as other subject matters discussed in this response if we determine that a
reasonable investor would consider such information to be material to an
investment decision.
2
2.
Disclose
the net sales that you recognized in each of the three years presented for
the new products of the company which carry a shelf-life expiration
date. You state in your disclosure that “there are no material
charges to net income in the current period, related to sales from a prior
period.” Tell us the amount of the change in your provision
recorded in 2008 related to sales made in periods before January 1,
2008.
Response:
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, net sales of products with limited
shelf-life and expiration dates were $265,095, $2,389,095 and $317,403,
respectively.
Approximately
$551,000 of the increase in the Company’s return provision at December 31, 2008
as compared to the return provision at December 31, 2007, was attributable to a
new product with a shelf-life expiration date that was launched by the Company
during fiscal 2007. The Company determined in fiscal 2008 to
discontinue this product due to poor retail sell through to
consumers. This increase in the return provision for the year ended
December 31, 2008 represented, as a percentage of net sales (i) 2.7% of the
Company’s fiscal 2008 net sales from continuing operations of $20,506,612, and
(ii) 2.0% of the Company’s fiscal 2007 net sales from continuing operations of
$28,241,502.
Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
Consolidated Financial
Statements
Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows, page F-4
3.
Please
refer to the revised Statements of Cash flows for the three year fiscal
period ended December 31, 2008 and the quarterly period ended March 31,
2009 in response to prior comment seven. Please tell us why the
modification of the cash flow statements to present the cash flows from
discontinued operations within the cash flows from operating, investing
and financing activities, resulted in a change to the net (decrease)
increase in cash and cash equivalents and to the beginning and ending cash
and cash equivalents balances for the periods
presented.
Response:
The
change to the net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents and to the
beginning and ending cash and cash equivalent balances for the periods presented
was due to treatment of cash held by the discontinued
operation. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company
included as a component of assets of discontinued operations, cash of $951,736
and $1,466,140, respectively, attributable to the underlying subsidiary held for
sale. As a consequence of the revised presentation of the statement
of cash flows, the beginning and ending cash and cash equivalents were adjusted
to include cash balances related to discontinued operations at the respective
period ended.
To
clarify the impact of cash flows on cash and cash equivalents we propose to
revise the cash flows presentation previously provided to you as
follows:
3
1. Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006:
THE
QUIGLEY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (REVISED)
Year
Ended
Year
Ended
Year
Ended
Dec 31, 2008
Dec 31, 2007
Dec 31, 2006
Cash
flows from operating activities:
Net
loss
$
(5,534,286
)
$
(2,458,337
)
$
(1,748,345
)
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
Loss
on asset impairment
100,000
-
-
Depreciation
and amortization
745,386
996,161
1,326,920
Loss
on the sales of fixed assets
26,925
19,737
-
Sales
allowance and provision for bad debts
1,282,599
(297,777
)
(340,726
)
Inventory
valuation provision
332,093
437,784
(680,290
)
(Increase)
decrease in assets and liabilities:
Accounts
receivable
866,745
182,261
1,663,519
Inventory
1,478,533
(987,307
)
318,250
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
80,405
(48,421
)
365,754
Other
assets
87,760
82,841
(69,282
)
Accounts
payable
155,976
(347,785
)
113,829
Accrued
royalties and sales commissions
(289,566
)
328,439
451,048
Accrued
advertising
(73,420
)
(770,498
)
(710,155
)
Other
current liabilities
(3,267,699
)
1,551,304
266,421
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
(4,008,549
)
(1,311,598
)
956,943
Cash
flows from investing activities:
Capital
expenditures
(200,544
)
(533,034
)
(697,479
)
Proceeds
from the sale of fixed assets
16,698
-
118,276
Net
cash flows used in investing activities
(183,846
)
(533,034
)
(579,203
)
Cash
flows from financing activities:
Principal
payments on debt
-
-
(1,464,286
)
Stock
options and warrants exercised
63,909
173,155
1,958,135
Net
cash provided by financing activities
63,909
173,155
493,849
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(4,128,486
)
(1,671,477
)
871,589
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
15,133,546
16,290,619
16,383,887
Add:
cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations
at beginning of period
951,736
1,466,140