SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for AECOM (ACM) — Feb 4, 2016

AECOM
Date: Feb. 4, 2016 · CIK: 0000868857 · Accession: 0000000000-16-063776

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: December 17, 2015

Date
February 4, 2016
Author
/s/ Terence O ’Brien
Form
UPLOAD
Company
AECOM

Letter

February 4, 2016 Mail Stop 4631 Via E -mail Mr. Troy Rudd Chief Financial Officer AECOM 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2600 Los Angeles, CA. 90067

Re: AECOM Form 10 -K for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2015 Filed November 25 , 2015 Response dated January 20, 2016 File No. 0-5242 3

Dear Mr. Rudd :

We have reviewed your response and have the following additional comments. We have limited our review to only your financial statements and related disclosures and do not intend to expand our review to other portions of your documents . In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter within ten business days by providing the requested information, or by advising us when you will provide the requested response. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing the information you provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments.

Form 10 -K for th e fiscal year ended September 30, 2015

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page Critical Accounting Policies, page 39

1. We note your response and draft disclosure you provided in response to comment 2 in our letter dated December 17, 2015. As previously requested, please expand your disclosures to provide investors with an understanding of the specific positive and negative evidence considered for each of the deferred tax assets that are considered not more likely than not to be realized. It should also be clear from your disclosure what specific facts and circumst ances would need to occur to reverse the valuation allowances recognized. Please refer to ASC 740 -10-30-16 through 30 -25 and Section 501.14 of the Financial Reporting Codification for guidance.

Mr. Rudd AECOM February 04, 2016 Page 2

Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies Revenue Recognition , page75

2. We note your response to comment 5 in our letter dated December 17, 2015, in which you note the presentation is based on the terms of the contracts, while “service” refers to the type of work performed under the contract. Please helps us better understand the components of your revenue recognition accounting policy. Specifically, please tell us the distinction you are drawing between the following portions of your accounting policy:

 Generally use a cost -to-cost approach when applying the percen tage-of-completion method of revenue recognition ; and  “Service -related contracts, including operations and maintenance services and a variety of technical assistance services, are accounted for over the period of performance, in proportion to the costs of performance ”.

Note 19 - Commitments and Contingencies, page 113 3. We note your response to comment 12 from our letter dated December 17, 2015. Please disclose (1) whether your reasonably possible loss disclosures are on a gross basis or netted with any thir d party recoveries and (2) your accounting policy for recognizing gain contingencies. Please also confirm to us that you are recognizing your loss and gain contingencies accruals on gross basis.

You may contact Ameen Hamady , Staff Accountant, at (202) 55 1-3891, or in his absence, Tracey Houser , at (202) 551 -3736 or me at (202) 551 -3355 , if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters.

Sincerely,
/s/ Terence O ’Brien

Show Raw Text
February 4, 2016
Mail Stop 4631

Via E -mail
Mr. Troy Rudd
Chief Financial Officer
AECOM
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2600
Los Angeles, CA. 90067

Re: AECOM
 Form 10 -K for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2015
Filed November 25 , 2015
Response dated January 20, 2016
File No. 0-5242 3

Dear Mr. Rudd :

We have reviewed your response  and have the following  additional comments.  We have
limited our review to only your financial statements and related disclosures and do not intend to
expand our review to other portions of your documents .  In some of our comments, we may ask
you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to  this letter within ten business days by providing the requested
information, or by advising us when you will provide the requested response.   If you do not
believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing the information you provide in response to these comments, we may
have additional comments.

Form 10 -K for th e fiscal year  ended September 30, 2015

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page
36
Critical Accounting Policies, page 39

1. We note your response and draft disclosure you provided in response to comment 2 in
our letter dated December 17, 2015.  As previously requested, please expand your
disclosures to provide investors  with an understanding of the specific positive and
negative evidence considered for each of the deferred tax assets that are considered not
more likely than not to be realized.  It should also be clear from your disclosure what
specific facts and circumst ances would need to occur to reverse the valuation allowances
recognized.  Please refer to ASC 740 -10-30-16 through 30 -25 and Section 501.14 of the
Financial Reporting Codification for guidance.

Mr. Rudd
AECOM
February 04, 2016
Page 2

Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition , page75

2. We note your response to comment 5 in our letter dated December 17, 2015, in which
you note the presentation is based on the terms of the contracts, while “service” refers to
the type of work performed under the contract.  Please helps us better understand the
components of your revenue recognition accounting policy.  Specifically, please tell us
the distinction you are drawing between the following portions of your accounting
policy:

 Generally use a cost -to-cost approach when applying the percen tage-of-completion
method of revenue recognition ; and
 “Service -related contracts, including operations and maintenance services and a
variety of technical assistance services, are accounted for over the period of
performance, in proportion to the costs of performance ”.

Note 19 - Commitments and Contingencies, page 113
3. We note your response to comment 12 from our letter dated December 17, 2015.  Please
disclose (1) whether your reasonably possible loss disclosures are on a gross basis or
netted with any thir d party recoveries and (2) your accounting policy for recognizing
gain contingencies.  Please also confirm to us that you are recognizing your loss and
gain contingencies accruals on gross basis.

You may contact Ameen Hamady , Staff Accountant, at (202) 55 1-3891, or in his
absence,  Tracey Houser , at (202) 551 -3736  or me at (202) 551 -3355 , if you have questions
regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Terence O ’Brien

Terence O’ Brien
Accounting Branch Chief
Office of Manufacturing and
Construction