SEC Comment Letter for AMCOR LTD (CIK 0000869428) — Mar 30, 2005
AMCOR LTD (CIK 0000869428)
Date: March 30, 2005 · CIK: 0000869428 · Accession: 0000000000-05-014894
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: March 11, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
March 28,
2005
W. Peter Day
Chief Financial Officer
Amcor Limited
679 Victoria Street
Abbotsford, Victoria 3067 Australia
RE: Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004
File No. 0-18893
Dear Mr. Day:
We have reviewed your letters dated March 11, 2005 and March
18, 2005 and have the following comments. Where indicated, we
think
you should revise your disclosures in response to these comments.
If
you disagree, we will consider your explanation as to why our
comment
is inapplicable or a revision is unnecessary. Please be as
detailed
as necessary in your explanation. Please understand that the
purpose
of our review process is to assist you in your compliance with the
applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall
disclosure in your filing. We look forward to working with you in
these respects. We welcome any questions you may have about our
comments or on any other aspect of our review. Feel free to call
us
at the phone numbers listed below.
FORM 20-F FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
Comment applicable to your overall filing
1. Where a comment below requests additional disclosures or other
revisions to be made, please show us in your supplemental response
what the revisions will look like. With the exception of the
comments below that specifically request an amendment, all other
revisions may be included in your future filings.
Item 8 - Financial Information
Anti-Trust Investigations and Related Management Changes, page 56
2. We have read your response to comment 5. As significant
changes
or developments occur, the company should disclose these matters
on a
timely basis. We note the related disclosure included in your
Form
6-K filed on February 22, 2005 particularly that included in Note
9,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. For U.S. GAAP
purposes, please continue to comply with the guidance in paragraph
22
of APB Opinion 28.
3. We note from your response to comment 6 that the interim report
concerning possible cartel conduct received by the Board of the
Company from its legal advisers on December 6, 2004 was an oral
report. Please provide the staff with any minutes, memorandum or
other forms of documentation which summarize the information
received
by the Board from the legal advisers. In addition, please provide
the
staff with any updated information as a result of the company`s
subsequent investigation of the matters.
4. Please tell us the amount of revenue recognized by the company
that relates to possible cartel conduct.
Item 15 - Controls and Procedures, page 73
5. We have read your response to comment 7. We have considered
your
response and continue to believe, as stated in our original
comment,
that an amendment to your Form 20-F for the year ended June 30,
2004
is required to state in clear and unqualified language, the
conclusions reached by your Executive Chairman and Chief Financial
Officer on the effectiveness of your disclosure controls and
procedures. We are unable to concur with the conclusion stated in
the first sentence of the second paragraph of your reply to
comment
7. Based upon the language in the first paragraph under Item 15,
it
appears that your Executive Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
have been unable to conclude that your disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by
your
report. We note that the company states that the preliminary
results
of its investigation indicate that there have been weaknesses in
internal disclosure controls and procedures concerning compliance
with competition laws and related matters. In addition to
previously
cited question 5 in the Divisions response to frequently asked
questions on management`s report on internal controls over
financial
reporting, we also refer your to question 10.
6. With respect to the preliminary indication of weakness in
internal
disclosure controls and procedures mention under Item 15, please
advise the staff of the corrective action taken or underway.
Financial Statements
Note 33 - Reconciliation of Accounts to US GAAP
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, page F-89
7. We have read your response to comment 9. You indicated that
customer receivables, including proceeds from the sale of
receivables
through securitization, should be classified as operating cash
flows.
We agree that the cash inflows directly from the receivables
collection should be reported as operating cash flows. However,
transfers of receivables that do not qualify as sales and that are
accounted for as secured borrowings give rise to financing cash
flows. Since the receivables are re-instated and the cash
received
is treated as a current liability under US GAAP, all cash flows
related to the current liability should be included in financing
activities. Please note that for US GAAP purposes, both operating
cash flows and financing cash flows are affected, whereas only
operating cash flows are affected under Australian GAAP. Please
disclose in the reconciliation of accounts to US GAAP the impact
of
the financing cash flows on the statement of cash flows for all
periods presented.
* * * *
Please respond to these comments within 10 business days, or
tell us when you will provide us with a response. Please provide
us
with a supplemental response letter that keys your responses to
our
comments and provides any requested supplemental information.
Detailed letters greatly facilitate our review. Please file your
supplemental response on EDGAR as a correspondence file. Please
understand that we may have additional comments after reviewing
your
responses to our comments.
You may contact Ernest Greene, Staff Accountant, at (202)
942-
8091, or in his absence, Nathan Cheney, Assistant Chief Accountant
at
(202) 942-1804, if you have questions regarding comments on the
financial statements and related matters.
Sincerely,
Rufus Decker
Accounting Branch Chief
??
??
??
??
Mr. W. Peter Day
March 28, 2005
Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-0510
DIVISION OF
CORPORATION FINANCE
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>