SEC Comment Letter for WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS II LP (CIK 0000869660) — Mar 31, 2005
WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS II LP (CIK 0000869660)
Date: March 31, 2005 · CIK: 0000869660 · Accession: 0000000000-05-015544
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: March 21, 2005
Letter
Mail Stop 04-09 VIA U.S. MAIL AND FAX (714) 662-4412 Mr. Thomas J. Rhia Chief Financial Officer WNC & Associates, Inc. 17782 Sky Park Circle Irvine, CA 92614-6404
RE: WNC California Housing Tax Credits II, L.P. File No. 0-20056 Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004 Forms 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended June 30, 2004, September 30, 2004, and December 31, 2004
Dear Mr. Riha:
We have reviewed your response letter dated March 21, 2005 and have the following additional comments. In our comments, we ask you to provide us with supplemental information so we may better understand your disclosure. After reviewing this information, we may or may not raise additional comments.
Please understand that the purpose of our review process is to assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing. We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome any questions you may have about our comments or on any other aspect of our review. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this letter.
Notes to Financial Statements
New Accounting Pronouncements, page 27
1. Your response to prior comment 3 reasons that voting rights in the Local limited Partnerships are not disproportionate to ownership interests by demonstrating the ways in which the registrant does control the Local Limited Partnerships through various important rights, such as replacing the management agent or in certain situations, the Local General Partner, and approval/veto rights over major decisions, including "obtaining financing, sale of property, major improvements, admission of new owners, or even sale of general partner interests". Such control would seem to indicate that consolidation of the Local Limited Partnerships would be required under paragraphs 9 and 10 of SOP 78-9. Please explain to us how the discussion in the second paragraph of your response reconciles to the use of the equity method and the Local General Partners` "substantive rights" mentioned in the fourth paragraph of your response.
2. Supplementally clarify to us whether the Local General Partners receive any acquisition fees, or similar fees, upon the closing of a transaction, with the registrant, as is common industry practice. If such fees are received by the Local General Partners, explain to us how such fees have impacted your evaluation of paragraph 5 (b) of FIN 46(R) and how the amount of the fee compares to the equity contributed by the Local General Partners.
Please respond to the comments included in this letter within ten business days. If you have any questions, you may contact William Demarest at (202) 824-5539 or me at (202) 824-5222.
Sincerely,
Steven Jacobs
Senior Staff Accountant
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
March 29, 2005
Mail Stop 04-09
VIA U.S. MAIL AND FAX (714) 662-4412
Mr. Thomas J. Rhia
Chief Financial Officer
WNC & Associates, Inc.
17782 Sky Park Circle
Irvine, CA 92614-6404
RE: WNC California Housing Tax Credits II, L.P.
File No. 0-20056
Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004
Forms 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended June 30, 2004,
September
30, 2004, and December 31, 2004
Dear Mr. Riha:
We have reviewed your response letter dated March 21, 2005
and
have the following additional comments. In our comments, we ask
you
to provide us with supplemental information so we may better
understand your disclosure. After reviewing this information, we
may
or may not raise additional comments.
Please understand that the purpose of our review process is
to
assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure
requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing.
We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome
any questions you may have about our comments or on any other
aspect
of our review. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers
listed
at the end of this letter.
Notes to Financial Statements
New Accounting Pronouncements, page 27
1. Your response to prior comment 3 reasons that voting rights in
the
Local limited Partnerships are not disproportionate to ownership
interests by demonstrating the ways in which the registrant does
control the Local Limited Partnerships through various important
rights, such as replacing the management agent or in certain
situations, the Local General Partner, and approval/veto rights
over
major decisions, including "obtaining financing, sale of property,
major improvements, admission of new owners, or even sale of
general
partner interests". Such control would seem to indicate that
consolidation of the Local Limited Partnerships would be required
under paragraphs 9 and 10 of SOP 78-9. Please explain to us how
the
discussion in the second paragraph of your response reconciles to
the
use of the equity method and the Local General Partners`
"substantive
rights" mentioned in the fourth paragraph of your response.
2. Supplementally clarify to us whether the Local General Partners
receive any acquisition fees, or similar fees, upon the closing of
a
transaction, with the registrant, as is common industry practice.
If
such fees are received by the Local General Partners, explain to
us
how such fees have impacted your evaluation of paragraph 5 (b) of
FIN
46(R) and how the amount of the fee compares to the equity
contributed by the Local General Partners.
Please respond to the comments included in this letter
within
ten business days. If you have any questions, you may contact
William Demarest at (202) 824-5539 or me at (202) 824-5222.
Sincerely,
Steven Jacobs
Senior Staff Accountant
??
??
??
??
WNC California Housing Tax Credits II, L.P.
March 29, 2005
Page 1
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>