SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA INC (CIK 0000874841) — Sep 2, 2005

PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA INC (CIK 0000874841)
Date: Sept. 2, 2005 · CIK: 0000874841 · Accession: 0000950137-05-010982

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: August 12, 2005

Date
August 31, 2005
Author
/s/ Michael L. Henry
Form
CORRESP
Company
PACIFIC SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA INC (CIK 0000874841)

Letter

Re:

August 31, 2005

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Attn: Anthony Watson

Comment Letter dated August 12, 2005

Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.

Form 8-K filed August 11, 2005

File No. 0-21296

We are writing this letter in response to the August 12, 2005 comment letter received by us from you with regard to our Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 11, 2005. We have included your inquiry from the August 12, 2005 comment letter in italics herein with our detailed response following.

1.

Please tell us if your certifying officers have considered the effect of the error on the adequacy of your disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by your Forms 10-Q for the periods ended July 31, 2004 and October 31, 2004.

Our certifying officers did consider the effect of the PacBucks error on the adequacy of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarterly periods ended July 31, 2004 and October 31, 2004. We amended our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 30, 2004, and included similar language in our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 30, 2005, to include the following language in Part I, Item 4 concerning that consideration:

“In each of the quarterly periods ended October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003, our Company’s then principal executive and financial officers (collectively, the “certifying officers”) evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in our periodic reports filed with the Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Commission’s rules and forms, and that the information is communicated to the certifying officers on a timely basis. The certifying officers concluded, based on their

evaluation, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of each of the periods covered by the respective Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

As a result of the need to restate the financial statements for the periods presented herein due to lease accounting issues and the impact of our PacBucks promotional program, our certifying officers and management have considered again whether our disclosure controls and procedures were effective on those dates. Based on the corrections required to be made, our certifying officers and management have concluded that a control deficiency existed with respect to lease accounting and PacBucks at each of October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003. Our certifying officers and management have concluded that this represents a control deficiency and that our disclosure controls and procedures as of October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003 were not effective. While assessing its internal control over financial reporting for Sarbanes-Oxley purposes for fiscal 2004, the Company effectively remediated these issues.

No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended October 30, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.”

With regard to this response, we acknowledge the following:

•

We are responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosures contained in our filings with the SEC;

•

We understand that any comments received by us from SEC staff or any changes that we may make to disclosures in response to SEC staff comments do not foreclose the SEC from taking any action with respect to our filings; and

•

We may not assert SEC staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the SEC or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

We have discussed this matter with our Audit Committee, external auditors and external counsel and believe our actions appropriately address this issue. If you have comments or questions, please contact Michael Henry, Controller, at (714) 414-4308 or Frank Schools, Vice President of Finance, at (714) 414-4062.

Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,
/s/ Michael L. Henry

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

corresp

August 31, 2005

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Attn: Anthony Watson

    Re:

    Comment Letter dated August 12, 2005

Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.

Form 8-K filed August 11, 2005

File No. 0-21296

We are writing this letter in response to the August 12, 2005 comment letter received by us from
you with regard to our Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August
11, 2005. We have included your inquiry from the August 12, 2005 comment letter in italics herein
with our detailed response following.

    1.

    Please tell us if your certifying officers have considered the effect of the error on the
adequacy of your disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
your Forms 10-Q for the periods ended July 31, 2004 and October 31, 2004.

Our certifying officers did consider the effect of the PacBucks error on the adequacy of the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarterly periods ended July 31,
2004 and October 31, 2004. We amended our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 30,
2004, and included similar language in our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 30, 2005,
to include the following language in Part I, Item 4 concerning that consideration:

“In each of the quarterly periods ended October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003, our Company’s then
principal executive and financial officers (collectively, the “certifying officers”) evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to
ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in our periodic reports filed with the
Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the
Commission’s rules and forms, and that the information is communicated to the certifying officers
on a timely basis. The certifying officers concluded, based on their

1

evaluation, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of each of the periods
covered by the respective Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

As a result of the need to restate the financial statements for the periods presented herein due to
lease accounting issues and the impact of our PacBucks promotional program, our certifying officers
and management have considered again whether our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
on those dates. Based on the corrections required to be made, our certifying officers and
management have concluded that a control deficiency existed with respect to lease accounting and
PacBucks at each of October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003. Our certifying officers and management
have concluded that this represents a control deficiency and that our disclosure controls and
procedures as of October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003 were not effective. While assessing its
internal control over financial reporting for Sarbanes-Oxley purposes for fiscal 2004, the Company
effectively remediated these issues.

No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended
October 30, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.”

With regard to this response, we acknowledge the following:

    •

    We are responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosures contained in our
filings with the SEC;

    •

    We understand that any comments received by us from SEC staff or any changes that we
may make to disclosures in response to SEC staff comments do not foreclose the SEC from
taking any action with respect to our filings; and

    •

    We may not assert SEC staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the
SEC or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

We have discussed this matter with our Audit Committee, external auditors and external counsel and
believe our actions appropriately address this issue. If you have comments or questions, please
contact Michael Henry, Controller, at (714) 414-4308 or Frank Schools, Vice President of Finance,
at (714) 414-4062.

Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,

/s/ Michael L. Henry

Michael L. Henry

Controller

Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.

2