SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for Stagwell Inc (STGW) (CIK 0000876883) (STGW) — Jun 13, 2014

Stagwell Inc (STGW) (CIK 0000876883)
Date: June 13, 2014 · CIK: 0000876883 · Accession: 0000000000-14-030293

Financial Reporting Regulatory Compliance Internal Controls

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-13718

Referenced dates: May 9, 2014

Date
March 10, 2014
Author
/s/ Robert S. Littlepage, for
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Stagwell Inc (STGW) (CIK 0000876883)

Letter

June 13 , 2014 Via E-mail Mr. David Doft Chief Financial Officer MDC Partners, Inc. 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10151 -1714

Re: MDC Partners, Inc. Form 10 -K for the Year Ended December 31, 201 3 Filed March 10, 2014 Form 8 -K filed February 20, 2014 Response dated May 19, 2014 File No. 001-13718

Dear Mr. Doft:

We have reviewed your response letter and have the following comments. As noted in our letter dated May 9, 2014, we have limited our review to only your financial statements and related disclosures and do not intend to expand our review to other portions of your documents. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understan d your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter within ten business days by amending your filing, by providing the requested information or by advising us when you will provide the requested response. If you do not believe our comments apply to your fac ts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing the information you provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments.

Form 10 -K for the Year Ended December 31 , 2013

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, pages 48 -49

1. We note your response to comment 3. We note that payment amounts attributable to the accretion of present value and changes in fair value are recorded as an expense in the statement of operations. Accordingly, please reclassify the compone nt of acquisition related payments attributable to changes in fair value and accretion s of present value under operating activities.

Mr. David Doft MDC Partners, Inc. June 13 , 2014 Page 2

2. Please tell us how the line item “Adjustment to Deferred Acquisition Consideration” (Cash Flows from Operating Activities) reconciles to “Redemption Value” as presented on page 79. In addition, include in footnote 13 your definitions of “Grants” and “Rede mption Value Adjustments” as stated in your response to comment 6 .

Deferred Acquisition and Contingent Consideration (Earnouts), page 37

Critical Accounting Policies (Business Combinations), page 40

3. We note your response to comment 4. It appears that you used the income approach to measure the fair value of the deferred acquisition and contingent consideration arrangement. If so, please tell us the following

a. What approaches you use d to estimate future cash flows ; b. How you gave effect to contract valuation formulas in your measurements ; and c. What discount rates were used and whether they were developed from a market participant’s perspective.

In addition, please tell us why the quarterly adjustmen ts are impacted by the change in the various contractual valuation formulas.

11. Bank Debt, Long -term Debt and Convertible Notes, page 72

4. We note your response to comment 5. We also note that you were required to obtain consent from your lenders for pay ment of dividends to you by the Loan Parties (such named subsidiaries on the signature page of your Restated Credit Agreement) to permit you to redeem the stock appreciation rights. Considering that such Loan Parties may not transfer assets to you without the consent of your lenders, it appears to us that you have restrictions on the transferability of assets from such Loan Parties (restricted subsidiaries). We therefore reiterate our previous comment. Please tell us how you calculated your proportionate share of the restricted net assets of your consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries for the purposes of providing restricted net asset disclosures and parent -only financial statements.

13. Fair Value Measurements, page 79

5. We note your response to comment 6. For each significant acquisition disclosed in note 4 on page 63, please tell us the specific factors that you considered in concluding that a s of the acquisition date s, the conting ent consideration was not considered a compensatory arrangement pursuant to ASC 805 -10-55-25.

Mr. David Doft MDC Partners, Inc. June 13 , 2014 Page 3

6. We note your response to comment 6. Please t ell us what you mean by “stock based compensation charges relating to acquisition payments that are tied to continued employment .” Also, tell us why the accretion of the present value is not reflected in the table on page 79 showing the movement of the “contingent payments” liability account.

Form 8 -K filed February 20, 2014

Exhibit 99.1

Schedule 4

Free Cash Flow

7. We note your responses to comments 7 and 9. Since “Free cash flows ” as presented in your earnings releases include s line items that are of an operating nature, we do not believe that it is appropriate to characterize this measure as “Free cash flows ” or “Adjusted cash flows. ” Accordingly, please r evise future filings. Confirm in writing that you will do so and explain to us how you intend to comply.

8. Please tell us how you intend to address "record results" in your future earnings releases, since the phrase does not appear to apply to your measures of liquidit y and performance under GAAP.

You may c ontact Kathryn Jacobson , Senior Staff Accountant, at (202) 551 -3365 or Dean Suehiro, Senior Staff Accountant , at (202) 551 -3384 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters . Please contact me at (202) 551 -3810 with any other questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ Robert S. Littlepage, for

Show Raw Text
June 13 , 2014

Via E-mail
Mr. David Doft
Chief Financial Officer
MDC Partners, Inc.
745 Fifth Avenue,
New York, NY 10151 -1714

Re: MDC Partners, Inc.
Form 10 -K for the Year Ended December 31, 201 3
Filed March 10, 2014
Form 8 -K filed February 20, 2014
Response dated May 19, 2014
File No. 001-13718

Dear Mr. Doft:

 We have reviewed your response letter and have the following comments.  As noted in
our letter dated May 9, 2014, we have limited our review to only your financial statements and
related disclosures and do not intend to expand our review to other portions of your documents.
In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better
understan d your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter within ten business days by amending your filing, by
providing the requested information or by advising us when you will provide the requested
response.  If you do not believe our comments apply to your fac ts and circumstances, please tell
us why in your response.

After reviewing the information you provide in response to these comments, we may
have additional comments.

Form 10 -K for the Year Ended December 31 , 2013

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows,  pages 48 -49

1. We note your response to comment 3.   We note that payment amounts attributable to the
accretion of present value and changes in fair value are recorded as an expense in the
statement of operations.   Accordingly, please reclassify the compone nt of acquisition
related payments attributable to changes in fair value and accretion s of present value
under operating activities.

Mr. David Doft
MDC Partners, Inc.
June 13 , 2014
Page 2

2. Please tell us how the line item “Adjustment to Deferred Acquisition Consideration”
(Cash Flows from Operating Activities) reconciles to “Redemption Value” as presented
on page 79.   In addition, include in footnote 13 your definitions of “Grants” and
“Rede mption Value Adjustments” as stated in your response to comment 6 .

Deferred Acquisition and Contingent Consideration (Earnouts), page 37

Critical Accounting Policies (Business Combinations), page 40

3. We note your response to comment 4.   It appears that you used the income approach to
measure the fair value of the deferred acquisition and contingent consideration
arrangement.   If so,   please tell us the following

a. What approaches  you use d to estimate future cash flows ;
b. How you gave effect to contract valuation formulas in your measurements ; and
c. What discount rates were used and whether they were developed from a market
participant’s perspective.

In addition, please tell us why the quarterly adjustmen ts are impacted by the change in
the various contractual valuation formulas.

11. Bank Debt, Long -term Debt and Convertible Notes, page 72

4. We note your response to comment 5.   We also note that you were required to obtain
consent from your lenders for pay ment of dividends to you by the Loan Parties (such
named subsidiaries on the signature page of your Restated Credit Agreement) to permit
you to redeem the stock appreciation rights.   Considering that such Loan Parties may not
transfer assets to you without  the consent of your lenders, it appears to us that you have
restrictions on the transferability of assets from such Loan Parties (restricted
subsidiaries).   We therefore reiterate our previous comment.   Please tell us how you
calculated your proportionate  share of the restricted net assets of your consolidated and
unconsolidated subsidiaries for the purposes of providing restricted net asset disclosures
and parent -only financial statements.

13.  Fair Value Measurements, page 79

5. We note your response to  comment 6.   For each significant acquisition disclosed in note 4
on page 63, please tell us the specific factors that you considered in concluding that a s of
the acquisition date s, the conting ent consideration was not considered a compensatory
arrangement  pursuant to ASC 805 -10-55-25.

Mr. David Doft
MDC Partners, Inc.
June 13 , 2014
Page 3

 6. We note your response to comment 6.   Please t ell us what  you mean by  “stock based
compensation charges relating to acquisition payments that are tied to continued
employment .”  Also, tell us why the accretion of the present  value is not reflected in the
table on page 79 showing the movement of the “contingent payments” liability account.

Form 8 -K filed February 20, 2014

Exhibit 99.1

Schedule 4

Free Cash Flow

7. We note your responses to comments  7 and 9.   Since “Free cash flows ” as presented in
your earnings releases include s line items that are of an operating nature, we do not
believe that it is appropriate to characterize this measure as “Free cash flows ” or
“Adjusted cash flows. ”  Accordingly, please r evise future filings.  Confirm in writing that
you will do so and explain to us how you intend to comply.

8. Please tell us how you intend to address "record results" in your future earnings releases,
since the phrase does not appear to apply to your measures of liquidit y and performance
under GAAP.

You may c ontact  Kathryn Jacobson , Senior Staff Accountant, at (202) 551 -3365 or Dean
Suehiro, Senior Staff Accountant , at (202) 551 -3384 if you have questions regarding comments
on the financial statements and related matters .  Please contact me at (202) 551 -3810 with any
other questions.

Sincerely,

/s/ Robert S. Littlepage, for

Larry Spirgel
Assistant Director