SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for Stagwell Inc (STGW) (CIK 0000876883) (STGW) — Feb 28, 2017

Stagwell Inc (STGW) (CIK 0000876883)
Date: Feb. 28, 2017 · CIK: 0000876883 · Accession: 0000000000-17-006724

Financial Reporting Business Model Clarity Related Party / Governance

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Date
February 28, 2017
Author
/s/ Robert S. Littlepage, for
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Stagwell Inc (STGW) (CIK 0000876883)

Letter

Mail Stop 3720 February 28, 2017 Mr. David Doft Chief Financial Officer MDC Partners Inc . 745 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10151

Re: MDC Partners Inc. Form 10 -K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015 Filed February 26, 2016 Form 10 -Q for Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2016 Filed November 8, 2016 Response dated January 23, 2017 File No. 001 -13718

Dear Mr. Doft :

We have reviewed your January 23, 2017 response to our comment letter and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to these comments within ten business days by providing t he requested information or advise us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments. Unless we note otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our December 16, 2016 letter.

Form 10 -K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015 14. Segment Information, page 75

Form 10 -Q for Fiscal Quarter Ended Sept ember 30, 2016 11. Segment Information, page 23

1. Please provide us with a paragraph description of the service offerings of each partner firm and indicate whether it participates in US, Canada, Europe and/or other markets. In addition, please provide the amount of revenue and profitability associated w ith each

Mr. David Doft MDC Partners Inc. February 28, 2017 Page 2

significant service offering by each partner firm and the percent of total revenues each significant service offering represents for each partner firm. If the profitability amount associated with each significant service offering for each partner firm is not tracked or available, then please state that this is the case for each firm.

2. We understand that firms are distinguished by their primary service offerings. Do the firms change their primary service offering? If so, please provide us a thr ee year depiction of which firms have changed by year, by primary service offering, and indicate what their prior primary service offering was. Provide to us the aggregate impact the change in primary service would have on the total population of partner firms that offered the same primary service, including as a percent of revenue, profitability, and total assets. This includes the impact on the population of partner firms that shared the prior primary service as well as the population of partner firms t hat share the same newly designated primary service offering.

3. In addition, please clarify for us whether or not there are changes to which firms the managing directors oversee and tell us how often those changes are made. Please provide us the actual changes in the last three years, including the name of the partner firm and the former managing director, along with the managing director to which the partner firm was changed in the given year.

Sincerely,
/s/ Robert S. Littlepage, for

Show Raw Text
Mail Stop 3720

February 28, 2017

Mr. David Doft
Chief Financial  Officer
MDC Partners Inc .
745 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10151

Re: MDC Partners Inc.
 Form 10 -K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015
 Filed February 26, 2016
 Form 10 -Q for Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2016
Filed November 8, 2016
 Response dated  January 23, 2017
File No. 001 -13718

Dear Mr. Doft :

We have reviewed your January 23, 2017  response to our comment letter and have the
following comments.  In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information
so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to these comments within ten business days by providing t he requested
information or advise us as soon as possible when you will respond.  If you do not believe our
comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have  additional comments.
Unless we note otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our December
16, 2016  letter.

Form 10 -K for Fiscal  Year Ended December 31, 2015
14.  Segment Information, page 75

Form 10 -Q for Fiscal Quarter Ended Sept ember 30, 2016
11. Segment Information, page 23

1. Please provide us with a paragraph description of the service offerings of each partner
firm and indicate whether it participates in US, Canada, Europe and/or other markets.   In
addition, please provide the amount of revenue and profitability associated w ith each

Mr. David Doft
MDC Partners Inc.
February 28, 2017
Page 2

 significant service offering by each partner firm and the percent of total revenues each
significant service offering represents for each partner firm.  If the profitability amount
associated with each significant service offering for each partner  firm is not tracked or
available, then please state that this is the case for each firm.

2. We understand that firms are distinguished by their primary service offerings.  Do the
firms change their primary service offering?   If so, please provide us a thr ee year
depiction of which firms have changed by year, by primary service offering, and indicate
what their prior primary service offering was.  Provide to us the aggregate impact the
change in primary service would have on the total population of partner firms that offered
the same primary service, including as a percent of revenue, profitability, and total assets.
This includes the impact on the population of partner firms that shared the prior primary
service as well as the population of partner firms t hat share the same newly designated
primary service offering.

3. In addition, please clarify for us whether or not there are changes to which firms the
managing directors oversee and tell us how often those changes are made.   Please provide
us the actual changes in the last three years, including the name of the partner firm and
the former managing director, along with the managing director to which the partner firm
was changed in the given year.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Robert S. Littlepage, for

 Larry Spirgel
Assistant Director
AD Office 11 – Telecommunications