SEC Company Response from Stagwell Inc (STGW) (CIK 0000876883) (STGW) — Jul 2, 2007
Stagwell Inc (STGW) (CIK 0000876883)
Date: July 2, 2007 · CIK: 0000876883 · Accession: 0001144204-07-034848
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: June 12, 2007
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Unassociated Document
July
2,
2007
Mr.
Larry
Spirgel
Assistant
Director
Mail
Stop
0407
Division
of Corporation Finance
Securities
and Exchange Commission
450
Fifth
Street, N.W.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
MDC
Partners Inc.
Form
10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006 (the “2006 Form
10-K”)
Filed
March 16, 2007
Form
10-Q for Fiscal Quarter March 31, 2007
File
No. 1-13178
Dear
Mr.
Spirgel:
Set
forth
below are the responses of MDC Partners Inc. (the “Company”) to the comments of
the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance, which were set forth in your
letter dated June 12, 2007 (the “June 12 Letter”) regarding the Company’s
above-referenced filings. The responses to the Staff’s comments are provided in
the order in which the comments were set out in the June 12 Letter and are
numbered correspondingly.
The
Staff’s comments, indicated by bold, are followed by responses on behalf of the
Company. Page references below are to the applicable Exchange Act filing, as
the
case may be.
Form
10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006
Note
4
- Acquisitions, page 54
1.
We
note your response to prior comment 2. It is not clear to us why
you have
cited EITF 96-16 and EITF 97-2 as a basis for consolidation of Mono
Advertising, LLC. In this regard, EITF 96-16 addresses a situation
where
the majority investor is not able to consolidate an entity due to
certain
rights granted to a minority shareholder. Since you are the minority
shareholder of Mono, this issue does not appear to be within the
scope of
EITF 96-16. In addition, EITF 97-2 addresses the accounting for
contractual arrangements between a management entity and an operations
entity. As it appears that your contractual agreement is between
the
owners of Mono, it is unclear to us why you believe this guidance
applies
to your fact pattern. If you continue to believe that consolidation
of
Mono is appropriate, please provide us with a more detailed analysis
of
your basis for this policy as well as a copy of the operating agreement
that sets forth each owner’s rights and
obligations.
Mr.
Larry
Spirgel
Securities
and Exchange Commission
July
2,
2007
Page
2
of
5
SUMMARY
The
Company has cited EITF 96-16 and EITF 97-2 as guidance in determining that
the
majority shareholders do not have control of Mono and thus should not
consolidate Mono. Furthermore, as described in greater detail below, control
rests with the minority shareholder, the Company, and based on this control
the
Company has consolidated Mono.
In
the
context of EITF 97-2, the Company believes that it is the management entity
(i.e. the entity with the controlling votes) and the operations entity is Mono.
Through the “Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Mono Advertising
LLC”, the Company has a contractual arrangement with the other equity holders
and Mono, the operating company. The Company has determined that, as a holding
company with significant decision making and control rights (as described
below), the Company functions as a management entity under EITF 97-2.
DETAILED
ANALYSIS
The
Company and Founding Partners as “Members” and Mono LLC have entered into the
Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Mono Advertising LLC (the
“Agreement”), dated July 1, 2006. Article IV of the Agreement outlines the
responsibilities and rights of the Members regarding the management of Mono.
Section 4.3 defines the Managers to be three representatives of the Company
and
three from the Founders. The three representatives of the Company are Rob
Dickson - Managing Director, Ray Forzley - Director of Corporate Development
and
Steven Berns - President and CFO. Section 4.10 provides the Company with the
tie
breaking vote in all matters. Section 4.1 outlines the specific rights and
responsibilities of the Company, the Founders and the Managers. This Section
4.1
describes the control rights the Company has such as approval of the operating
and capital budget decisions, the ability to terminate and to set the
compensation of management (including the Founders) responsible for implementing
Mono’s policies and procedures. Section 4.1 (e) requires participation by Mono
in the Company’s cash management program, which requires all of Mono’s cash
receipts to be swept daily into the Company’s concentration bank
account.
Mr.
Larry
Spirgel
Securities
and Exchange Commission
July
2,
2007
Page
3
of
5
EITF
97-2:
·
EITF
97-2 provides guidance that “A controlling financial interest exists if,
for a requisite period of time, the PPM has “control” over the physician
practice and has a “financial interest” in the physicians’ practice that
meets all six of the requirements listed below.” Application of these
requirements is as follows: (Assume the Company is the PPM and Mono
is the
physician practice.)
Term
- The contractual arrangement between the Company and Mono:
1.
Has
a term that is either (a) the entire remaining legal life of Mono
or (b) a
period of 10 years or more.
Mono is a LLC which is expected to have an indefinite life, thus
the
contractual arrangement between the Company and Mono is deemed to
have an
indefinite life. (See Section 1.5.)
2.
Is
not terminable by Mono except in the case of gross negligence, fraud,
or
other illegal acts by the Company, or bankruptcy of the
Company.
Mono can not terminate the Agreement with the Company. The Agreement
can
only be terminated upon dissolution/liquidation of Mono by the Company
and
the Founders. (See Article IX.)
Control
- The Company has exclusive authority over all decision making related to both
of the following:
3.
Ongoing,
major, or central operations of Mono, except for providing marketing
communication services.
In
accordance with the Agreement, the Founders shall report directly
to the
Mono Board of Members and to the Company. The Founders and other
Managers
are to carry out their duties, as may be assigned to them from time
to
time by or under the authority of the Mono Board of Members and/or
the
Company. During their term, the Founders and Managers shall have
the
responsibility (subject to the term of the authority of the Board
of
Members and the Company and the parameters of the current operating
and
capital budgets including cash flow and the incurrence of debt) for
the
general management of the business and together with management of
the
Company, the long-term planning of the Mono. As a result, the Company
has
authority over decision making related to the ongoing, central operations
of the business. This is authority is derived from the Company’s tie
breaking vote. (See Section 4.1.)
4.
Total
compensation of the employees of Mono, as well as the ability to
establish
and implement guidelines for the selection, hiring and firing of
them.
The Agreement provides for the Company to approve compensation and
the
hiring and firing of employees. This approval right is derived from
the
Company’s tie breaking vote. (See Section 4.1 (a) (xii) and (b)
(iii)-(v).)
Mr.
Larry
Spirgel
Securities
and Exchange Commission
July
2,
2007
Page
4
of
5
Financial
Interest - The Company must have significant financial interest in Mono that
meets both of these criteria:
5.
Is
unilaterally salable or transferable by the Company. According
to the Agreement, the Company’s membership interests may be sold or
transferred by the Company without the consent of the Founders and
no
membership interest shall be sold or transferred by the founders
without
the consent of the Company. (See Section
10.1.)
6.
Provides
the Company with the right to receive income, both as ongoing fees
and as
proceeds from the sale of its interest in Mono, in an amount that
fluctuates based on the operations of Mono and the change in the
fair
value thereof.
Profits are split between the equity holders based on current ownership
interests based the current performance and operating results of
Mono.
(See Section 3.3.)
CONCLUSION
Based
on
the analysis set forth above, the Company has satisfied the contractual criteria
of EITF 97-2 for consolidating Mono.
The
Company has included as an exhibit to this letter the Second Amended and
Restated Operating Agreement of Mono Advertising LLC.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Please
direct any questions concerning the above responses to the undersigned
(telephone: (646) 429-1803; fax: (212) 937-4365), with a copy to Ethan
Klingsberg (Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP; fax: (212)
225-3999).
Very
truly yours,
/s/
Michael
Sabatino
Chief
Accounting Officer
Mr.
Larry Spirgel
Securities
and Exchange Commission
July
2,
2007
Page 5
of
5
Enclosures
cc:
Melissa
Hauber
Robert
S.
Littlepage, Jr.
Securities
and Exchange Commission
Miles
S.
Nadal, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Mitchel
Gendel, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
Steven
Berns, President and Chief Accounting Officer
Members
of the Audit Committee of Board of Directors of MDC Partners Inc.
Joseph
Klausner, BDO Seidman LLP
Ethan
Klingsberg, Esq., Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP