SEC Company Response from AGCO (AGCO) — Jun 15, 2005
AGCO CORP /DE (AGCO) (CIK 0000880266)
Date: June 15, 2005 · CIK: 0000880266 · Accession: 0000950144-05-006539
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-113560, 333-125255
Referenced dates: June 9, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
----------------------------- TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP -----------------------------
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA
600 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E. - SUITE 5200
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30308-2216
www.troutmansanders.com
TELEPHONE: 404-885-3000
FACSIMILE: 404-885-3900
Thomas J. Schramkowski Direct Dial: 404-885-3386
tom.schramkowski@troutmansanders.com Direct Fax: 404-962-6782
June 15, 2005
VIA EDGAR AND UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attn: David Ritenour
Special Counsel
Re: SEC Comments to AGCO Corporation Form S-4, Filed May 26, 2005,
File No. 333-125255, and Schedule TO-I, Filed May 26, 2005,
File No. 005-43776
Dear Mr. Ritenour:
The following are the responses of AGCO Corporation to the comments of
the Staff of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on AGCO's Form
S-4 and Schedule TO-I, each filed on May 26, 2005, as such comments were
transmitted to AGCO in a letter from the Staff dated June 9, 2005. We are
submitting this letter on behalf of AGCO, and the terms "we," "us," "our" and
"the Company" in the following responses refer to AGCO.
In connection with responding to the comments of the Staff, the Company
acknowledges that it is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure in this filing; that Staff comments or changes to disclosure in
response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any
action with respect to this filing; and that the Company may not assert the
Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any
person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
<PAGE>
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
June 15, 2005
Page 2
SCHEDULE TO-I
Comment No. 1:
We note the press release issued May 26, 2005 (filed pursuant to Rule
425 under cover of Form 8-K), in which you only state that a copy of
the Schedule TO may be obtained from our web site. Please tell us
whether you also mailed the prospectus and letter of transmittal to
security holders. See Rule 13e-4(e)(2).
Response:
Copies of each document were directly provided to each record holder,
the trustee and each known beneficial owner. In addition, the trustee
distributed the documents to holders through the DTC system.
Comment No. 2:
Please provide us your analysis regarding why the financial statements
information described in Item 1010 of Regulation M-A is not required.
Response:
We did not include the financial statements information described in
Item 1010 of Regulation M-A because our financial condition is not
material to the decisions of holders to exchange their existing notes
for similar notes offered by us, and, therefore, such information is
not required under Item 10 of Schedule TO. In particular, under both
the Old Notes and the New Securities, we are obligated to pay the full
amount of the principal in cash at maturity. While our obligation to
pay a portion of the conversion price in cash is a feature of the New
Securities, this amount, although significant, is not material to us
and readily could be funded by us. Further, it is likely that
conversion will occur only if our stock appreciates significantly,
thereby suggesting good financial health on our part and even easier
funding for the cash settlement. Nonetheless, we note that our
prospectus incorporates by reference our Exchange Act filings, which
include financial statements that substantially meet the financial
statements requirements of Item 1010 of Regulation M-A and Item 10 of
Schedule TO.
<PAGE>
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
June 15, 2005
Page 3
Purposes of the Transaction and Plans or Proposals
Comment No. 3:
You have indicated that Item 6(c) of Schedule TO is not applicable.
Please revise to respond to the Item.
Response:
We will amend Item 6(c) of our Schedule TO-I to incorporate by
reference the information regarding the consummation of the exchange
offer under the headings "Summary -- The Exchange Offer," " -- Material
Differences Between the Old Notes and the New Securities" and " --
Summary of New Securities".
Exhibits
Comment No. 4:
Please include your May 26, 2005 press release as an exhibit to the
Schedule TO.
Response:
We will amend our Schedule TO-I to include our May 26, 2005 press
release regarding the exchange offer as an exhibit.
FORM S-4
General
Comment No. 5:
Please provide a background section in your prospectus that summarizes
the issuance of the Old Notes, the filing of the resale registration
statement (Registration Statement No. 333-113560) declared effective on
June 7, 2004, the commencement of your exchange offer, and your
intentions with respect to the resale registration statement.
Response:
We will include a background section in the prospectus that provides
the following:
<PAGE>
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
June 15, 2005
Page 4
"We issued the Old Notes in a Rule 144A private placement to qualified
institutional buyers in December 2003. Subsequently, we registered the
resale of the Old Notes and the shares of our common stock issuable
upon conversion of the Old Notes with the SEC on a Form S-3
Registration Statement, which was declared effective on June 7, 2004.
We are commencing this exchange offer to exchange the Old Notes for New
Securities on the terms set forth in this prospectus, and we registered
the offering of the New Securities with the SEC on a Form S-4
registration statement filed on May 26, 2005, which will be declared
effective prior to the expiration date (or we will not proceed with the
offer). We intend to keep the Form S-3 Registration Statement available
for resales of any Old Notes (and common stock issuable upon conversion
thereof) not exchanged for New Securities until our obligation to do so
expires in December 2005, at which time holders of the Old Notes will
need to rely on Rule 144, Rule 144A or another exemption from
registration under the Securities Act to sell their Old Notes (or the
common stock issuable upon conversion thereof)."
Registration Statement Cover Page
Comment No. 6:
Please indicate the amount of common stock issuable upon conversion of
the New Securities in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table. You
should use a good-faith estimate to register the maximum amount of
shares that could be issued upon conversion of the New Securities. If
that estimate is insufficient, the company will need to file a new
registration statement to register for resale additional shares at the
appropriate time. With regard to your footnote number 2, please note
that Rule 416 does not permit you to register an indeterminate amount
of common stock to be issued upon conversion of the new Securities. See
Phone Interpretation 2S from the March 1999 Supplement (Securities Act
Rules subsection).
Response:
We will amend the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table on the cover
page of our Form S-4 Registration Statement to indicate the estimated
maximum number of shares of our common stock that could be issued upon
conversion of the New Securities. We also will replace footnote number
2 with the following language: "Represents an estimate of the maximum
number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes
registered hereby at a conversion rate of 58.5823 shares per $1,000
principal amount of notes. Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities
Act, such number of shares registered hereby shall include an
indeterminate number of shares of common stock that may be
<PAGE>
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
June 15, 2005
Page 5
issued in connection with a stock dividend, stock split,
recapitalization or similar event."
Prospectus Cover Page
Comment No. 7:
We note that the offer commenced on May 26, 2005 and is scheduled to
expire at 5 p.m. on June 23, 2005. Please revise the offer so that it
is open 20 full business days in compliance with Rule 14e-1(a). See
Rule 13e-4(a)(3) for additional guidance. Note that May 30, 2005 was a
federal holiday.
Response:
We will amend the prospectus to change the expiration date of the
exchange offer from 5:00 p.m. to midnight, New York City time, on June
23, 2005, which, under Rule 13e-4(a)(3), is 20 full business days from
and after the May 26, 2005 launch date for the offer.
Where You Can Find More Information, page ii
Comment No. 8:
While we recognize that any documents you file pursuant to Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date the prospectus is
declared effective may be deemed incorporated by reference into the
Form S-4, Schedule TO-I does not permit forward-incorporation by
reference. Please confirm that the Schedule TO-I will be amended to
specifically include any information that is deemed to be
forward-incorporated by reference into the Form S-4, or advise.
Response:
We confirm to you that we will amend Schedule TO-I to specifically
include any information that would be deemed forward-incorporated by
reference into the Form S-4 were that process permitted.
The Exchange Offer, page 2
Comment No. 9:
Describe the effect on your liquidity and capital resources from the
cash settlement provisions of the New Securities, and discuss the means
by which you reasonably expect
<PAGE>
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
June 15, 2005
Page 6
to finance the cash requirement resulting from conversion of the New
Securities.
Response:
We note that for financial planning purposes, we have assumed that the
Old Notes, since their issue in December 2003, would not be converted
into shares of our common stock, but rather, as debt, would be repaid
in cash. As a result, the cash portion of the settlement of the New
Securities has no impact on our current financial plans. However, in
response to the Staff's comment, we will amend the prospectus to add
the following paragraph:
"Although we do not currently have in place a financial facility with
which to pay the cash amount due upon maturity or conversion of the New
Securities, our financial position currently is sufficiently strong
that we would expect to have ready access to a bank loan facility or
the broader debt and equity markets to the extent needed. Typically,
convertible securities are not converted prior to expiration unless
called for redemption, which we would not do if sufficient funds were
not available to us. As a result, we do not expect the New Securities
to be converted in the foreseeable future."
The Exchange Offer - Amendment of the Exchange Offer, page 3
Comment No. 10:
On page 3 you reserve the right to "interpret or modify the terms of
the exchange offer." Revise to clarify your ability to "interpret" the
terms of the offer. Note that a tender offer may be conditioned on a
variety of events and circumstances, provided that they are not within
the direct or indirect control of the bidder, and are drafted with
sufficient specificity to allow for objective verification that the
conditions have been satisfied.
Response:
We will delete the language on page 3 of the prospectus, and any
similar language throughout the document, that appears to expressly
grant us the right to interpret the terms of the exchange offer other
than in accordance with objective standards.
Material Differences Between the Old Notes and the new Securities, page 5
Comment No. 11:
Revise your disclosures to describe, in plain English, the following:
<PAGE>
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
June 15, 2005
Page 7
o Describe the contingent conversion provisions of the Old Notes so
that it is clearer how EITF Issue No. 04-8 applies, including, for
example, the implied conversion price and market price trigger.
o Clarify that the exchange will result in your reporting higher EPS
(retroactively and prospectively) than if the exchange did not
occur. Give an example of what the effect on 2004 reported EPS
would be if the exchange did not occur both in this section and in
the section "The Exchange Offer - Purpose of the Exchange Offer"
on page 25.
Response:
The table on page 5 of the prospectus illustrates the material
differences between the Old Notes and the New Securities. While the
conversion provisions of the Old Notes and the New Securities are
similar, including with regard to the contingent conversion features
and the events upon which each is convertible (market price trigger,
trading price trigger, etc.), they differ in how each is settled upon
conversion. Therefore, we only discuss the differences in settlement
upon conversion in the table on page 5. However, in response to the
Staff's comment, we will add the implied conversion price to the
description of the settlement of the Old Notes in the table (since it
is included in the parallel description of the New Securities) and
clarify that only common shares will be issued upon conversion of the
Old Notes (except for cash for fractional shares).
We also will include the following discussion at the end of the table
on page 5 and in the section "The Exchange Offer - Purpose of the
Exchange Offer":
"The exchange offer will result in our reporting higher earnings per
share in future reporting periods than if the exchange did not occur
because the number of shares of our common stock issuable upon
conversion of the New Securities will be less than the number of shares
issuable upon conversion of the Old Notes (as a result of settling the
aggregate principal amount of the New Securities in cash rather than
common stock upon conversion). As an example of this effect, had we
consummated the exchange offer on January 1, 2004, our earnings per
share for the year ended December 31, 2004 would