SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP (BSX) (CIK 0000885725) (BSX) — Oct 31, 2016

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP (BSX) (CIK 0000885725)
Date: Oct. 31, 2016 · CIK: 0000885725 · Accession: 0000000000-16-099031

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Date
October 31, 2016
Author
/s/ Martin James
Form
UPLOAD
Company
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP (BSX) (CIK 0000885725)

Letter

Mail Stop 3030 October 31, 2016 Via E -mail Daniel J. Brennan Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Boston Scientific Corporation 300 Boston Scientific Way Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752 -1234

Re: Boston Scientific Corporation Form 8 -K dated July 28, 2016 Filed July 28, 2016 File No. 001 -11083

Dear Mr. Brennan :

We have reviewed your September 30, 2016 response to our comment letter and have the following comments. In some of our comments , we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this comment within ten busine ss days by providing the requested information or advis e us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to this comment , we may have additional comments.

Form 8 -K date d July 28, 2016

1. While we see from your response that you indicate each restructuring plan is a result of unique business circumstances and contains targeted initiatives approved by your Board of Directors over a defined timeframe, it does not appear to address the nature and recurrence of the charges. We note from your disclosures that the 2014 Plan was intended to build on the progress you made to address financial pressures in a changing global marketplace, further strengthen the company’s operational effectiveness and efficiency, support new growth investments and build on your PNO strategy. Similarly, we note your disclosure that the 2016 restructuring plan is intended to develop global commercialization, technology and manufacturing capabilities in key growth markets, also build on your PNO strategy which is intended to simplify its manufac turing plant structure by transferring certain production lines among facilities, and expand operational

Daniel J. Brennan Boston Scientific Corporation October 31, 2016 Page 2

efficiencies in support of your operating income margin goals. Please tell us how these seemingly important initiatives are incremental to your core ac tivities.

2. Your response indicates that you exclude litigation charges that are unique and exceed your materiality threshold and that you do not exclude charges that result from your operations and are below your materiality threshold. Please explain to u s in greater detail how you determine what is and is not excluded from your non -GAAP measures. Explain what you mean by “unique” versus “result from our operations” and describe t o us your materiality threshold. Also, please describe to us the sp ecific litigation charges excluded in each of the three years ended December 31, 2015 and explain how they comply with your non -GAAP policy. As part of your response, please address the fact that you have excluded the entire “litigation -related charges” line item from your non -GAAP measures.

You may contact Julie Sherman at (202) 551 -3640 or Christine Dietz, Assistant Chief Accountant , at (202) 551 -3408 with any questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ Martin James

Show Raw Text
Mail Stop 3030

October 31, 2016

Via E -mail
Daniel J. Brennan
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Boston Scientific Corporation
300 Boston Scientific Way
Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752 -1234

Re: Boston Scientific Corporation
Form 8 -K dated July 28, 2016
Filed July 28, 2016
File No. 001 -11083

Dear Mr. Brennan :

We have reviewed  your September 30, 2016 response to our comment letter and have the
following comments.  In some of our comments , we may ask you to provide us with information
so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this comment  within ten busine ss days by providing the requested
information or advis e us as soon as possible when you will respond.  If  you do not believe our
comments  apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to this comment , we may have  additional comments.

Form 8 -K date d July 28, 2016

1. While we see from your response that you indicate each restructuring plan  is a result of
unique business circumstances and contains targeted initiatives approved by your Board
of Directors over a defined timeframe, it does not appear to address the nature and
recurrence of the charges. We note from your disclosures that the 2014  Plan was intended
to build on the progress you made to address financial pressures in a changing global
marketplace, further strengthen the company’s operational effectiveness and efficiency,
support new growth investments and build on your PNO strategy. Similarly, we note  your
disclosure that the 2016 restructuring plan is intended to  develop global
commercialization, technology and manufacturing capabilities in key growth markets,
also build on your PNO strategy which is intended to simplify its manufac turing plant
structure by transferring certain production lines among facilities, and expand operational

Daniel J. Brennan
Boston Scientific  Corporation
October 31, 2016
Page 2

 efficiencies in support of your operating income margin goals. Please tell us how these
seemingly important initiatives are incremental to your core ac tivities.

2. Your response indicates that you exclude litigation charges that are unique and exceed
your materiality threshold and that you do not exclude charges that result from your
operations and are below your materiality threshold.  Please explain to u s in greater detail
how you determine what is and is not excluded from your non -GAAP measures.  Explain
what you mean by “unique” versus “result from our operations” and describe t o us your
materiality threshold.  Also, please describe to us  the sp ecific litigation charges excluded
in each of the three years ended December 31, 2015 and explain how they comply with
your non -GAAP policy.  As part of your response, please address the fact that you have
excluded the entire “litigation -related charges” line item  from your non -GAAP measures.

You may contact Julie Sherman  at (202) 551 -3640  or Christine Dietz, Assistant Chief
Accountant , at (202) 551 -3408  with any questions.

Sincerely,

/s/ Martin James

 Martin James
Senior Assistant Chief Accountant
Office of Electronics and Machinery