SEC Company Response from FUELCELL ENERGY INC (FCEL, FCELB) (CIK 0000886128) (FCEL) — Aug 7, 2006
FUELCELL ENERGY INC (FCEL, FCELB) (CIK 0000886128)
Date: Aug. 7, 2006 · CIK: 0000886128 · Accession: 0001144204-06-031320
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-14204
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Unassociated Document
RICHARD
A.
KRANTZ
Financial
Centre
695
East Main Street
P.O.
Box 10305
Stamford,
CT 06904-2305
Main
(203) 462-7500
Fax
(203) 462-7599
rkrantz@rc.com
Direct
(203) 462-7505
Also
admitted in New York
and
Massachusetts
August
7,
2006
Ms.
Kate
Tillan
Assistant
Chief Accountant
United
States Securities and Exchange Commission
450
Fifth
Street, N.W.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
FuelCell
Energy Inc.
Form
10-K for the year ended October 31, 2005
Filed
January 17, 2006
File
No. 001-14204
Dear
Ms.
Tillan:
This
correspondence is in response to the Staff’s questions per our telephone
conversations relating to FuelCell Energy, Inc. (“FuelCell” or the “Company”).
The Staff’s questions have been included prior to the Company’s
response.
1.
In
the Guarantee dated May 27, 2004, FuelCell guarantees the obligations
of
the Series 1 Preferred Stock. In that guarantee, however, FuelCell
also
guarantees the obligations of FuelCell Energy, Ltd. pursuant to the
terms
of the Joint Development Agreement made between Global Thermoelectric
Inc.
and Enbridge as of July 31, 2000. Please explain (1) what the Joint
Development Agreement is and (2) if the Company had considered the
relationship of FIN 45 to that
agreement.
Ms.
Kate
Tillan
Securities
and Exchange Commission
August
7,
2006
Page
2
FuelCell
Response:
(1)
Joint Development Agreement
The
Joint
Development Agreement was initially entered into in July 2000 between Global
Thermoelectric, Inc. (“Global”) and Enbridge, Inc. (“Enbridge”) prior to
FuelCell’s acquisition of Global. The agreement essentially consists
of:
-
a
research and development program whereby the two entities would work
towards developing commercially viable versions of Solid Oxide Fuel
Cell
products (Global’s responsibility) and performing market research,
securing test locations, etc. (Enbridge’s responsibility)
-
a
grant of exclusive distribution authority whereby Global appointed
Enbridge as the exclusive distributor of specific SOFC products in
a
specified territory. The two entities also agreed to commence negotiations
to establish a definitive distribution
agreement.
The
Joint
Development Agreement was subsequently amended to (a) extend certain dates
established to negotiate a definitive distribution agreement outlined in the
initial agreement and (b) transfer all of Global’s rights, title and interest in
the Joint Development Agreement to FuelCell Energy, Ltd. This agreement was
subsequently assigned to Versa Power Systems, Inc. (“Versa”) upon the sale of
the Solid Oxide Fuel Cell assets of FuelCell Energy, Ltd. to Versa in November
2004.
There
were no obligations in the Joint Development Agreement that required recognition
in FuelCell’s consolidated financial statements.
(2)
Assessment of FIN 45 “Guarantor's
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others”.
The
Company advises the Staff that there were no contractual obligations in the
Joint Development Agreement that would have required recognition by FuelCell
Energy, Ltd.
With
regard to the guarantee by FuelCell of both the Series 1 Preferred share
obligations and the Joint Development Agreement, the Company believes that
FIN
45 does not apply as the guarantee was issued by FuelCell to Enbridge relating
to the obligations of FuelCell Energy, Ltd. (including obligations of FuelCell
Energy, Ltd. under the Joint Development Agreement). In addition, this agreement
would not have resulted in recording any new obligations. FuelCell was merely
guaranteeing compliance of its subsidiary under the existing Joint Development
Agreement with Enbridge. The relevant references from FIN 45 are Paragraph
4 and
Paragraph A23;
Ms.
Kate
Tillan
Securities
and Exchange Commission
August
7,
2006
Page
3
-
Paragraph 4 of FIN 45 states that “the scope of this Interpretation does not
encompass indemnifications or guarantees of an entity’s own future performance
(for example, a guarantee that the guarantor will not take a certain future
action)”.
-
Paragraph A23 of FIN 45 excludes guarantees issued among corporations under
common control from the recognition, measurement, and disclosure provisions
of
FIN 45.
Based
on
the above, the Company has concluded that FIN 45 is not applicable in this
circumstance.
2.
In
the Company’s response dated July 12, 2006, the Staff found confusing the
first paragraph of our response responding to comment number 2. That
comment related to how the preferred stock would be accounted for
in
separate, stand-alone financial statements of the subsidiary and
the
parent.
FuelCell
Response:
The
first
paragraph in our response dated July 12, 2006 to comment number 2 was as
follows:
“The
Company believes the preferred shares should not be accounted for as equity
of
FuelCell Energy, Ltd. if it were to present stand-alone financial statements,
and should be accounted for as equity of FuelCell Energy, Inc. in its
stand-alone (i.e., parent-only) financial statements. The Company believes
that
if stand-alone financial statements were presented for both FuelCell Energy,
Ltd. and FuelCell Energy, Inc., the preferred shares would be disclosed as
legal-form equity issued by FuelCell Energy, Ltd.”
Ms.
Kate
Tillan
Securities
and Exchange Commission
August
7,
2006
Page
4
The
Company advises the Staff that the first sentence is referring to how the Series
1 Preferred shares would be accounted
for in
stand-alone financial statements of FuelCell and FuelCell Energy, Ltd. and
the
second sentence is referring to the required disclosures
in those
statements. The Series 1 Preferred shares would not be accounted for as equity
of FuelCell Energy, Ltd. in stand-alone financials. Nonetheless, disclosure
would be required that FuelCell Energy, Ltd. was the issuer of this legal-form
equity and that these shares are being accounted for as equity in FuelCell’s
financial statements.
3.
(a)
Article 7 of the Charter of FuelCell Energy, Ltd. seems to impose
restrictions on the ability of FuelCell Energy, Ltd. to take certain
acts
without the consent of the holders of Preferred Stock. Please comment.
FuelCell
Response:
If
FuelCell Energy, Ltd. fails to remain current with its dividend obligations,
Article 7 does impose the following restrictions on FuelCell Energy, Ltd.:
-
From
paying dividends on junior stock.
-
From
issuing senior stock or from redeeming, purchasing or making capital
distributions to any junior or pari passu
stock.
-
Setting
aside any money or making any payments for any sinking fund or other
retirement fund applicable to any junior
stock.
FuelCell
Energy, Ltd. is current with its dividend obligations.
(b)
The Staff would like verification confirming that Global had the ability to
convey its assets without the consent of the holders of the Series 1 Preferred
stock.
Ms.
Kate
Tillan
Securities
and Exchange Commission
August
7,
2006
Page
5
FuelCell
Response:
The
terms
of the Preferred Stock of Global were the same as the terms of the Series 1
Preferred stock issued by FuelCell Energy, Ltd. The Company confirms that there
was in fact no consent required from Enbridge for the conveyance of assets
prior
to the sale of Global, as the Global dividend payments on the Series 1 Preferred
stock were current.
(c)
On November 1, 2004, FuelCell pledged to Enbridge its shares of Versa Power
Systems, Inc. What was the purpose of that Pledge
Agreement?
FuelCell
Response:
As
discussed in response number 1 above, the rights, title and interests in the
Joint Development Agreement had been transferred to FuelCell Energy, Ltd. upon
the sale of Global. This agreement was subsequently assigned to Versa upon
the
sale of the Solid Oxide Fuel Cell assets of FuelCell Energy, Ltd. to Versa
in
November 2004. The Series 1 shareholder agreement contains no requirement to
obtain shareholder consent for the transfer of assets, however, FuelCell Energy
Ltd. obtained Enbridge’s consent to assign the Joint Development Agreement to
Versa. Enbridge and FuelCell Energy, Ltd. assigned the Joint Development
Agreement to Versa because Enbridge’s original investment was connected to this
solid oxide research and development and Enbridge wanted the Joint Development
Agreement to follow the technology and assets.
In
conjunction with Enbridge’s consent to assign the Joint Development Agreement to
Versa, which resulted in FuelCell having no further responsibility for the
Joint
Development Agreement, FuelCell agreed in the Pledge Agreement to provide
Enbridge with a security interest in 5,714 shares of Versa. This pledge
agreement was not meant to convey that there was any legal requirement to obtain
consent from Enbridge for the transfer of assets from FuelCell Energy, Ltd.
to
Versa. The Company confirms that the Series 1 shareholder agreement contains
no
requirement to obtain shareholder consent for the transfer of assets.
Ms.
Kate
Tillan
Securities
and Exchange Commission
August
7,
2006
Page
6
4.
Does
the dividend obligation on the Series 1 Preferred stock continue
after
2020?
FuelCell
Response:
The
Company expects either redemption or conversion of the Series 1 Preferred
stock
in 2020. Following redemption or conversion, there would no longer be a dividend
obligation. The terms of the Series 1 Preferred shares entitle holders to
dividends as long as such shares are outstanding.
The
Company is able to control this process. On and after July 31, 2010, the
Series
1 Preferred shares are redeemable by FuelCell Energy, Ltd. for Cdn$25 per
share
plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. If FuelCell Energy, Ltd. waits until
July
31, 2020 to call for redemption, it is likely that the holder of these shares
would convert them into FuelCell common stock at a conversion price equal
to 95%
of the then current market price of shares of FuelCell common
stock.
Ms.
Kate
Tillan
Securities
and Exchange Commission
August
7,
2006
Page
7
FuelCell
acknowledges the following:
-
FuelCell
is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in
its Form
10-K for the year ended October 31,
2005;
-
Staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do
not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to FuelCell’s
Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2005;
and
-
FuelCell
may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated
by
the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of
the
United States.
Sincerely,
/s/
Richard A. Krantz
Richard
A. Krantz
cc:
Joseph G. Mahler