SEC Company Response from GLEN BURNIE BANCORP (GLBZ) (CIK 0000890066) (GLBZ) — Aug 18, 2005
GLEN BURNIE BANCORP (GLBZ) (CIK 0000890066)
Date: Aug. 18, 2005 · CIK: 0000890066 · Accession: 0001144204-05-026218
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 000-24047
Letter
August 18, 2005 Via EDGAR and FEDEX Joyce Sweeny, CPA Accounting Branch Chief Division of Corporation Finance Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549
RE: Glen Burnie Bancorp (the "Company") Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2004 File No. 000-24047
Dear Ms. Sweeny:
I am writing to you in response to your letter of August 9, 2005 regarding the referenced file number. Below are the Company's responses to the comments raised.
FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
1. Note 12 - Post-Retirement Health Care Benefits, page F-22
Background
Prior to December 31, 2001, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, The Bank of Glen Burnie (the "Bank") provided health care benefits (the "Benefits") to employees who retire at age 65 with five years of full time service immediately prior to retirement and two years of participation in the Bank's medical benefits plan. During 2001, the Bank amended the Benefits plan to include the Bank's then-current Board of Directors and their spouses and the spouses of current retirees. For the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, the Company accrued $1,075,675 to cover the actuarially projected cost of the Benefits plan. During 2002, the Bank concluded that the Benefits plan, as then in effect, was not economically feasible for the Company and, during the first quarter of 2002, the Bank again amended the Benefits plan, effective December 31, 2002, to provide that only retired employees and directors and their spouses as of December 31, 2002 will be eligible to receive Benefits, and all Benefits to participants will terminate on December 31, 2006.
<PAGE>
Joyce Sweeny, CPA Division of Corporation Finance Securities and Exchange Commission August 18, 2005
Page 2
Who is affected by the termination of Benefits?
Two groups of the Bank's employees are affected by the amendment to the Benefits plan:
o Eligible former employees and directors who were retired as of December 31, 2002 and their spouses (12 individuals in the aggregate), would have received lifetime Benefits prior to the 2002 amendment. As amended, this group will continue to receive Benefits only through December 31, 2006.
o Eligible employees and directors who had not retired by December 31, 2002 and their spouses (111 individuals in the aggregate as of December 31, 2002), would have received, upon retirement, lifetime Benefits prior to the 2002 amendment, assuming eligibility at the time of retirement. As amended, this group will not receive any Benefits under the Benefits plan.
When are the Benefits expected to be paid?
For those individuals still eligible to receive Benefits following the 2002 amendment, the benefits under the Benefits plan will be paid out as the medical insurance premiums are incurred pursuant to the terms of the Benefits plan through December 31, 2006.
How and when does the Company plan to settle the Bank's post-retirement benefit obligations?
On December 31, 2002, based on an actuarial projection, the Company accrued $269,955 to cover the premiums payable for the Benefits through December 31, 2006. During each subsequent year, the Bank pays the premiums on the health insurance provided pursuant to the Benefits plan. On December 31 of each year thereafter, the Company adjusts the amount in the accrual to reflect the updated actuarial projection.
How did the Company determine that the plan amendment was a curtailment?
The Company determined that the 2002 amendment to the Benefits plan was a curtailment in accordance with SFAS 106, paragraph 96.
How did the Company determine the amount of the net curtailment gain?
The Company obtained an actuarial valuation of the Benefits plan as of December 31, 2002. In accordance with that calculation, the Bank's postretirement Benefits accrual as of December 31, 2001, prior to the 2002 amendment, was $1,075,675, and the accrual as of December 31, 2002, following the 2002 amendment, was $272,812. The difference of $802,863 was adjusted by $39,220 to reflect the excess premium contribution for 2002, resulting in a net curtailment gain of $763,643.
<PAGE>
Joyce Sweeny, CPA Division of Corporation Finance Securities and Exchange Commission August 18, 2005
Page 3
What was the Company's basis for recognizing the net curtailment gain in 2002?
The Company recognized the net curtailment gain in 2002 in accordance with SFAS 106, paragraph 99.
Should you require any further information or have additional comments, please contact me.
Sincerely,
GLEN BURNIE BANCORP
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
[GLEN BURNIE BANCORP LETTERHEAD]
August 18, 2005
Via EDGAR and FEDEX
Joyce Sweeny, CPA
Accounting Branch Chief
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549
RE: Glen Burnie Bancorp (the "Company")
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2004
File No. 000-24047
Dear Ms. Sweeny:
I am writing to you in response to your letter of August 9, 2005 regarding the
referenced file number. Below are the Company's responses to the comments
raised.
FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
1. Note 12 - Post-Retirement Health Care Benefits, page F-22
Background
Prior to December 31, 2001, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, The
Bank of Glen Burnie (the "Bank") provided health care benefits (the "Benefits")
to employees who retire at age 65 with five years of full time service
immediately prior to retirement and two years of participation in the Bank's
medical benefits plan. During 2001, the Bank amended the Benefits plan to
include the Bank's then-current Board of Directors and their spouses and the
spouses of current retirees. For the Company's fiscal year ended December 31,
2001, the Company accrued $1,075,675 to cover the actuarially projected cost of
the Benefits plan. During 2002, the Bank concluded that the Benefits plan, as
then in effect, was not economically feasible for the Company and, during the
first quarter of 2002, the Bank again amended the Benefits plan, effective
December 31, 2002, to provide that only retired employees and directors and
their spouses as of December 31, 2002 will be eligible to receive Benefits, and
all Benefits to participants will terminate on December 31, 2006.
<PAGE>
Joyce Sweeny, CPA
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities and Exchange Commission
August 18, 2005
Page 2
Who is affected by the termination of Benefits?
Two groups of the Bank's employees are affected by the amendment to the
Benefits plan:
o Eligible former employees and directors who were retired as of December
31, 2002 and their spouses (12 individuals in the aggregate), would have
received lifetime Benefits prior to the 2002 amendment. As amended, this
group will continue to receive Benefits only through December 31, 2006.
o Eligible employees and directors who had not retired by December 31, 2002
and their spouses (111 individuals in the aggregate as of December 31,
2002), would have received, upon retirement, lifetime Benefits prior to
the 2002 amendment, assuming eligibility at the time of retirement. As
amended, this group will not receive any Benefits under the Benefits plan.
When are the Benefits expected to be paid?
For those individuals still eligible to receive Benefits following the
2002 amendment, the benefits under the Benefits plan will be paid out as the
medical insurance premiums are incurred pursuant to the terms of the Benefits
plan through December 31, 2006.
How and when does the Company plan to settle the Bank's post-retirement benefit
obligations?
On December 31, 2002, based on an actuarial projection, the Company
accrued $269,955 to cover the premiums payable for the Benefits through December
31, 2006. During each subsequent year, the Bank pays the premiums on the health
insurance provided pursuant to the Benefits plan. On December 31 of each year
thereafter, the Company adjusts the amount in the accrual to reflect the updated
actuarial projection.
How did the Company determine that the plan amendment was a curtailment?
The Company determined that the 2002 amendment to the Benefits plan was a
curtailment in accordance with SFAS 106, paragraph 96.
How did the Company determine the amount of the net curtailment gain?
The Company obtained an actuarial valuation of the Benefits plan as of
December 31, 2002. In accordance with that calculation, the Bank's
postretirement Benefits accrual as of December 31, 2001, prior to the 2002
amendment, was $1,075,675, and the accrual as of December 31, 2002, following
the 2002 amendment, was $272,812. The difference of $802,863 was adjusted by
$39,220 to reflect the excess premium contribution for 2002, resulting in a net
curtailment gain of $763,643.
<PAGE>
Joyce Sweeny, CPA
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities and Exchange Commission
August 18, 2005
Page 3
What was the Company's basis for recognizing the net curtailment gain in 2002?
The Company recognized the net curtailment gain in 2002 in accordance with
SFAS 106, paragraph 99.
Should you require any further information or have additional comments, please
contact me.
Sincerely,
GLEN BURNIE BANCORP
/s/ John E. Porter
-----------------------
John E. Porter
Chief Financial Officer
cc: Mr. F. William Kuethe, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
Nancy Maloney, Staff Accountant
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>