SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for MORGAN STANLEY (MS, MS-PA, MS-PE, MS-PF, MS-PI, MS-PK, MS-PL, MS-PO, MS-PP, MS-PQ) (CIK 0000895421) (MS) — Dec 13, 2006

MORGAN STANLEY (MS, MS-PA, MS-PE, MS-PF, MS-PI, MS-PK, MS-PL, MS-PO, MS-PP, MS-PQ) (CIK 0000895421)
Date: Dec. 13, 2006 · CIK: 0000895421 · Accession: 0000000000-06-060932

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-11758

Date
November 28, 2006
Author
Kevin W. Vaughn
Form
UPLOAD
Company
MORGAN STANLEY (MS, MS-PA, MS-PE, MS-PF, MS-PI, MS-PK, MS-PL, MS-PO, MS-PP, MS-PQ) (CIK 0000895421)

Letter

November 28, 2006 By U.S. Mail and facsimile to (212) 404-9707. David H. Sidwell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Morgan Stanley 1585 Broadway New York, NY 10036

Re: Morgan Stanley Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2005 File No. 001-11758

Dear Mr. Sidwell:

We have reviewed your response filed October 4,, 2006 and have the following additional comments. Where i ndicated, we think you should revise your future filings in response to these comments. If you disagree, we will consider your explanation as to why our comments are inapplicable or a revision is unnecessary. Please be as detailed as necessary in your explanation. In our comment, we may ask you to provide us with supplemental information so we may better understand your disclosure. After reviewing this information, we may or may not raise additional comments.

Please understand that the purpose of our re view process is to assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing. We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome any questions you may have about our comments or any other aspect of our review. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this letter.

Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Income, page 109 1. We note your response to prior comments 1 and 2 of our lett er dated August 28, 2006, including your proposed disclosures. We recognize that your presentation of the results of operations is consistent with what appears to be an industry practice that has developed. We believe th is industry practice conflicts with the guidance set forth in Article 5 of Regulati on S-X. We will continue to consider what steps, if any, should be taken to rectify the departure from Regulation S-X;

David H. Sidwell Morgan Stanley November 28, 2006 Page 2 however, we believe that disclosure of what, if anything, we decide to do is premature at this time. Based upon the representations you have provided to us regarding the undue burden to comply with Regulation S-X, we do not object to your presentation of the results of your operations at this time.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, page 111 2. We have reviewed your response to our pr evious comment 2. Paragraph 8(a) of SOP 01-6 states that receivables may be classified as held for investment only if management has the intent and ability to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff. Please tell us the following information:

• You state that you randomly select credit card receiv ables for securitization purposes. Given your history of securi tizations within this portfolio, and your reliance on these securitizations fo r liquidity purposes, please tell us in detail how you determined that at origination , you were able to determine that you had the positive intent to hold any one particular credit card receivable to maturity.

• You state in your response that you de termine a desired level of funding by utilizing a mix of funding sources in cluding securitizations and that you perform this analysis on a quarterly basi s. Please tell us in detail how you integrated your projections regarding future funding requirements into your judgment regarding your intent and ab ility to hold receivables for the foreseeable future.

Financial Instruments Used for Asset and Liability Management, page 116 3. Please refer to our previous comment 4. For the fair value hedges for which you utilize the shortcut method of hedge accounting related to the Long Term Borrowings – Senior Debt, please tell us the terms of both the call option embedded in your callable debt and the mi rror image call option contained in your swap, including the maturity, strike price, and related notional amounts. Additionally, please tell us if the premium for the call feature contained in the debt is paid via an adjustment over th e life of the borrowings , or upon call of the debt.

* * * * *

Please respond to these comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide us with a response. Please furnish a cover letter that keys your response to our comments, indicates your inte nt to include the requested revisions in future filings and provides any requested supplemental in formation. Please provide us with your

David H. Sidwell Morgan Stanley November 28, 2006 Page 3 proposed disclosures. Please understand that we may have additional comments after reviewing your responses to our comments.

You may contact Rebekah M oore, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551-3463 or me at (202) 551-3494 if you have questions.

Sincerely,
Kevin W. Vaughn
Branch Chief

Show Raw Text
Mail Stop 4561

November 28, 2006

By U.S. Mail and facsimile to (212) 404-9707.

David H. Sidwell
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Morgan Stanley
1585 Broadway
New York, NY 10036

Re: Morgan Stanley
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2005
 File No. 001-11758

Dear Mr. Sidwell:

We have reviewed your response filed October 4,, 2006 and have the following
additional comments.  Where i ndicated, we think you should revise your future filings in
response to these comments.  If you disagree, we will consider your explanation as to
why our comments are inapplicable or a revision  is unnecessary.  Please be as detailed as
necessary in your explanation.  In our comment, we may ask you to provide us with
supplemental information so we may better understand your disclosure.  After reviewing
this information, we may or may not raise additional comments.

 Please understand that the purpose of our re view process is to assist you in your
compliance with the applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall
disclosure in your filing.  We look forward to  working with you in these respects.  We
welcome any questions you may have about our comments or any other aspect of our review.  Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this letter.

Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Income, page 109
1. We note your response to prior comments 1 and 2 of our lett er dated August 28,
2006, including your proposed disclosures.  We recognize that your presentation of the results of operations is consistent  with what appears to be an industry
practice that has developed.  We believe th is industry practice conflicts with the
guidance set forth in Article 5 of Regulati on S-X.  We will continue to consider
what steps, if any, should be taken to rectify the departure from Regulation S-X;

David H. Sidwell
Morgan Stanley
November 28, 2006 Page 2
however, we believe that disclosure of what, if anything, we decide to do is
premature at this time.  Based upon the representations you have provided to us
regarding the undue burden to comply with  Regulation S-X, we do not object to
your presentation of the results of  your operations at this time.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, page 111
2. We have reviewed your response to our pr evious comment 2.  Paragraph 8(a) of
SOP 01-6 states that receivables may be  classified as held for investment only if
management has the intent and ability to  hold the receivables for the foreseeable
future or until maturity or payoff.   Please tell us the following information:

• You state that you randomly select credit card receiv ables for securitization
purposes.  Given your history of securi tizations within this portfolio, and
your reliance on these securitizations fo r liquidity purposes, please tell us in
detail how you determined that at origination , you were able to determine
that you had the positive intent to hold any one particular credit card receivable to maturity.

• You state in your response that you de termine a desired level of funding by
utilizing a mix of funding sources in cluding securitizations and that you
perform this analysis on a quarterly basi s.  Please tell us in detail how you
integrated your projections regarding future funding requirements into your
judgment regarding your intent and ab ility to hold receivables for the
foreseeable future.

Financial Instruments Used for Asset and Liability Management, page 116
3. Please refer to our previous comment 4.  For the fair value hedges for which you utilize the shortcut method of hedge  accounting related to the Long Term
Borrowings – Senior Debt, please tell  us the terms of both the call option
embedded in your callable debt and the mi rror image call option contained in your
swap, including the maturity, strike price, and related notional amounts.
Additionally, please tell us if the premium for the call feature contained in the
debt is paid via an adjustment over th e life of the borrowings , or upon call of the
debt.

* * * * *

Please respond to these comments within  10 business days or tell us when you
will provide us with a response.   Please furnish a cover letter that keys your response to
our comments, indicates your inte nt to include the requested revisions in future filings
and provides any requested supplemental in formation.  Please provide us with your

David H. Sidwell
Morgan Stanley
November 28, 2006 Page 3
proposed disclosures.  Please understand that  we may have additional comments after
reviewing your responses to our comments.

You may contact Rebekah M oore, Staff Accountant, at  (202) 551-3463 or me at
(202) 551-3494 if you have questions.

Sincerely,

Kevin W. Vaughn
Branch Chief