SEC Company Response from Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS, GPUS-PD) (CIK 0000896493) (GPUS) — Aug 29, 2007
Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS, GPUS-PD) (CIK 0000896493)
Date: Aug. 29, 2007 · CIK: 0000896493 · Accession: 0001144204-07-047064
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Unassociated Document
August
28, 2007
VIA
EDGAR
Brian
R.
Cascio
Accounting
Branch Chief
US
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division
of Corporation Finance
Mail
Stop
6010
100
F
Street, N.E.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
Digital Power Corporation.
Form
10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
Form
10-Q for fiscal quarter March 31, 2007
File
No.: 1-12711
Dear
Mr.
Cascio:
This
letter will set forth the Company's responses to the comments of the Staff
of
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") set forth in a letter to Jonathan
Wax Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,
dated
July 26, 2007 (the "Staff Comments") in connection with the above-referenced
filing submissions.
We
have
repeated your numbered comments below and have provided a response to each
comment.
Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
Management
Discussion and Analysis, page 10
Results
of Operations, page 11
1.
SEC
Comment: “We read in Note 12 that you have two product lines. In future filings
please expand the discussion of revenues to also quantify and discuss reasons
for changes in revenues by product line.”
In
response to the Staff comment, we supplementally advise the staff that we intend
to revise our disclosure in future filings by expanding the discussion of
revenues and quantify the revenues generated from the two product lines. In
addition, we will clarify the reasons for changes in revenues by product line
in
the format we reported in form 10QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 per
below.
“Total
revenues for the Company decreased by 23.9% to $2,536,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2007, from $3,333,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Revenue from the military products of the Company increased by 39.1% to $963,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2007, from $692,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2006. Revenue from the commercial products of the Company
decreased by 40.4% to $1,573,000 from $2,641,000 for the three months ended
June
30, 2006. The decrease in commercial product revenue is mainly attributed to
end
of life issues related to older standard product lines and timing issues while
the increase in military product revenues is mainly attributed to new design
wins.”
Form
10-Q for March 31, 2007
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis, page 16.
2.
SEC
Comment: “In future filings please disclose reasons for material changes
in revenues by segment and product
line.”
In
response to the Staff comment, we supplementally advise the staff that we intend
to review and revise our disclosure in future filings to disclose reasons for
material changes in revenues by segment as we reported in form 10QSB for the
period ended June 30, 2007 per below:
“Revenues
from the domestic operations of the Company decreased by 22.7% to $1,111,000
for
the three months ended June 30, 2007, from $1,438,000 for the three months
ended
June 30, 2006. Revenues from the Company’s European operations of DPL decreased
24.8% to $1,425,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007, from $1,895,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease in the company’s European
operations is mainly attributed to timing issues with existing and new
customers. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, revenues for the Company
decreased by 12.6% to $5,278,000 from $6,041,000 for the six months ended June
30, 2006. The decrease in product revenue is mainly attributed to end of life
issues related to older product lines and timing issues. Revenues attributed
to
the domestic operations of the Company decreased by 19.1% to $2,314,000 from
$2,861,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease in product
revenue is mainly attributed to end of life issues related to older product
lines and timing issues. Revenues from the Company’s European operations of DPL
decreased by 6.8% to $2,964,000 from $3,180,000 for the six months ended June
30, 2006.”
In
addition, reasons for material changes in product line on consolidated basis
will be disclosed as discussed in the response to comment number
one.
3.
SEC
Comment: “Under Financial Income, we read that financial income is mainly
due to interest received from the exchange rate fluctuation. Please
explain to us and clarify in future filings how exchange rate changes
generate interest income. If you are referring to income or expense
generated by foreign currency transactions, please
clarify.”
In
response to the Staff comment, we advise the staff that the financial income
is
mainly due to interest income derived from our cash equivalents. In addition,
Financial Income includes income/expense generated by foreign currency
transactions entered into by our wholly owned subsidiary located in United
Kingdom (DPL). We advise the staff that we will further clarify in future
filings how financial income/expense is derived.
2
4.
SEC
Comment: “Under Liquidity and Capital Resources, in future filings please
disclose reasons for material changes in cash flows provided or used
by
operations during the periods
presented.”
In
response to the staff comment, we supplementally advise the staff that we intend
to review and revise our disclosure in future filings to disclose reasons for
material changes in cash flows provided or used by operations during the periods
presented as we reported in form 10QSB for the period ended June 30,
2007:
“Cash
used by
operating activity was mainly due to decrease in accounts payable and related
parties trade payables due to timing differences and net loss, offset partially
by decrease in accounts receivable due to increased efforts on
collection.”
We
acknowledge that the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of
the
disclosure in the filing. Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response
to
staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with
respect to the filing and the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense
in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal
securities laws of the United States.
Should
you
have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jonathan
Wax
Chief
Executive Officer
3