SEC Company Response from MORGAN STANLEY LIMITED TERM MUNICIPAL TRUST (CIK 0000904169) — Jul 29, 2005
MORGAN STANLEY LIMITED TERM MUNICIPAL TRUST (CIK 0000904169)
Date: July 29, 2005 · CIK: 0000904169 · Accession: 0000950136-05-004434
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 811-7700
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
July 29, 2005
Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549
Attention: Larry Greene, Division of Investment Management
Mail Stop 0505
RE: MORGAN STANLEY LIMITED TERM MUNICIPAL TRUST
(FILE NOS. 33-62158 AND 811-7700)
Dear Mr. Greene:
Thank you for your telephonic comments regarding the registration statement on
Form N-1A for Morgan Stanley Limited Term Municipal Trust (the "Fund") filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2005. Below, we describe
the changes made to the registration statement in response to the Staff's
comments and provide any responses to or any supplemental explanations of such
comments, as requested. These changes will be reflected in post-effective
amendment number 15 to the Fund's registration statement on Form N-1A, which
will be filed via EDGAR on or about July 29, 2005.
GENERAL COMMENTS TO FORM N-1A
-----------------------------
COMMENT 1. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE FUND IS COMPLYING WITH THE PRIVACY POLICY
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT AND
DISTRIBUTING ITS PRIVACY POLICY TO INVESTORS.
Response 1. The Fund provides its privacy policy annually in
accordance with the requirements of Regulation S-P.
COMMENT 2. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT INCLUDES THE
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND CUSTOMER VERIFICATION DISCLOSURE REQUIRED
BY THE U.S. PATRIOT ACT.
Response 2. The requisite notice of the customer
identification verification policy is disclosed in the
account application form. Anti-money laundering and customer
verification disclosure is also included under the
"Shareholder Information-How to Buy Shares" section of the
Fund's prospectus.
COMMENTS TO THE PROSPECTUS
--------------------------
COMMENT 3. THE FUND'S INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE STATES THAT THE FUND SEEKS TO
PROVIDE A HIGH LEVEL OF CURRENT INCOME THAT IS EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL
INCOME TAX. THE FUND'S
INVESTMENT POLICIES STATE THAT THE FUND MAY INVEST ANY AMOUNT OF
ITS ASSETS IN SECURITIES THAT PAY INTEREST INCOME SUBJECT TO THE
"ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX," AND FURTHER STATES THAT SOME TAXPAYERS
MAY HAVE TO PAY TAX ON A FUND DISTRIBUTION OF THIS INCOME. PLEASE
RECONCILE THESE STATEMENTS
Response 3. As discussed under "Tax Consequences" in the
Prospectus, certain municipal securities issued to finance
private, for profit organizations pay interest that is
generally exempt from federal income tax, but which may be
subject to the alternative minimum tax. Accordingly, to the
extent it invests in such private activity bonds, the Fund
will pass through to its shareholders income that is exempt
from federal income tax, consistent with its investment
objective. However, certain shareholders who are subject to
the alternative minimum tax because they have claimed
numerous deductions or exemptions would have to pay federal
income tax on this ordinarily tax-free income. In the third
paragraph of page 2 of the Prospectus, the Fund discloses to
shareholders that it may not be a suitable investment for
investors subject to the alternative minimum tax due to its
investments in private activity bonds.
COMMENT 4. THE FUND'S INVESTMENT POLICIES STATE: "THE MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS IN
THE FUND'S PORTFOLIO WILL HAVE AN ANTICIPATED AVERAGE
DOLLAR-WEIGHTED MATURITY RANGE OF SEVEN TO 10 YEARS, WITH A MAXIMUM
AVERAGE DOLLAR-WEIGHTED MATURITY OF 12 YEARS. AT LEAST 80% OF THE
FUND'S NET ASSETS WILL HAVE A MATURITY OF 15 YEARS OR LESS." THE
SEC HAS A POLICY THAT THE MAXIMUM BE 12 YEARS. IT APPEARS THAT THE
80% POLICY DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE STAFF'S POSITION.
Response 4. In its "Frequently Asked Questions about Rule
35d-1," the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission
clarified that the "names rule" did not apply to mutual
funds whose names suggest that the funds invest in bonds of
a particular maturity. However, the staff reiterated in the
FAQ its position that a "short term," "intermediate term" or
"long term" bond fund should have a dollar-weighted average
maturity of, respectively, no more than 3 years, more than 3
years, but less than 10 years, or more than 10 years."
Investment Company Act Release No. IC-15612 (March 9, 1989),
Guide 20 to proposed Form N-7 provides: "[i]f the trust has
a name or investment objective that characterizes the
maturity of its securities portfolio, the dollar-weighted
average portfolio maturity of the trust must reflect the
characterization." Neither the Fund's name nor its
investment objective characterize the maturity of the
portfolio. The Fund has a fundamental policy of investing at
least 80% of its assets in intermediate term bonds that pay
interest that is exempt from federal income taxes.
Consistent with the staff's position on average weighted
maturities, the Fund states in its prospectus that it
generally expects to have a dollar-weighted average maturity
of 7 to 10 years. However, because the Fund calls itself a
"limited term" bond, fund and not an "intermediate term"
bond fund, the Fund "limits" its maximum average dollar
weighted maturity to 12 years and invests at least 80% of
2
its assets in bonds with a maturity of 15 years or less (so
long as the average dollar-weighted maturity of its
portfolio does not exceed 12 years). Thus, because the Fund
neither calls itself an "intermediate term" bond fund nor
has an investment objective that characterizes the maturity
of its portfolio, the Fund believes that it is not subject
to the Staff's positions on dollar-weighted average
portfolio maturity and that the Fund's investment strategies
are appropriate given its name.
COMMENT 5. CONSIDER INCLUDING THE ORDER PROCESSING FEE IN THE FEE TABLE OR AS
A FOOTNOTE TO THE FEE TABLE AND IN THE EXAMPLE.
Response 5. The Order Processing Fee is not a fee imposed by
the Fund. It is a fee that Morgan Stanley DW Inc. charges
its clients. Therefore, it should not be included in the fee
table, as a footnote to the fee table or in the Example.
COMMENT 6. IF A DESCRIPTION OF THE FUND'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT
TO THE DISCLOSURE OF THE FUND'S PORTFOLIO SECURITIES IS AVAILABLE
ON THE FUND'S WEBSITE, PLEASE SO STATE IN THE PROSPECTUS.
Response 6. Such a description does not appear on the Fund's
website.
COMMENT 7. HAVE FUND SHAREHOLDERS APPROVED THE AMENDED AND RESTATED INVESTMENT
ADVISORY AGREEMENT?
Response 7. The Fund's investment advisory agreement was
amended and restated to remove the administrative services
component from the Management Agreement and to reduce the
investment advisory fee. The administrative services
previously provided to the Fund by the Investment Adviser
are being provided by Morgan Stanley Services Company Inc.
("Administrator") pursuant to a separate administration
agreement entered into by the Fund with the Administrator.
Such change resulted in a reduction in the advisory fee
concurrent with the implementation of an administration fee
equal to the amount of the advisory fee reduction pursuant
to the new administration agreement. Shareholder approval
was not required.
COMMENT 8. CONSIDER ADDING ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE REGARDING FAIR VALUATION TO
THE SECTION "PRICING FUND SHARES".
Response 8. We respectfully acknowledge the comment, but
believe the current disclosure is sufficient.
COMMENT 9. SUPPLEMENTALLY DISCUSS WHETHER WRITTEN NOTICE WITH RESPECT TO THE
FUND'S POLICY "TO REJECT, LIMIT OR PROHIBIT EXCHANGES WITHOUT PRIOR
NOTICE, AT ITS SOLE DISCRETION ..." SET FORTH IN THE "LIMITATIONS
ON EXCHANGES" SECTION OF THE PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY
PROVIDED TO INVESTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 11A-3. CLARIFY THAT
THE FUND WOULD ONLY REJECT THE PURCHASE PORTION OF AN EXCHANGE
REQUEST.
3
Response 9. The Fund's ability to reject, limit or prohibit
exchanges is designed to offer the Fund flexibility to
address market timing abuses as they occur. The Release
adopting the rules requiring enhanced market timing
disclosure specifically authorizes such a policy provided it
is disclosed in the Fund's prospectus. Further, written
notice of the policy, as disclosed in the Fund's prospectus,
is consistent with the provisions of Rule 11a-3(b)(6)(ii).
Exchange requests consist of a redemption of Fund shares and
a simultaneous purchase of another fund's shares. The Fund
reserves the right to reject any exchange request for any
reason. The Fund would not reject a valid redemption
request.
COMMENT 10. CONSIDER ADDING ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE REGARDING REVENUE SHARING TO
THE SECTION "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION".
Response 10. We respectfully acknowledge the comment, but
believe the current disclosure is sufficient.
COMMENT 11. IN THE "HOW TO EXCHANGE SHARES - EXCHANGE PROCEDURES" SECTION,
PLEASE REPLACE THE WORD "ACCEPTED" WITH "RECEIVED" OR ANOTHER TERM
TO THAT EFFECT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 22C-1, WITH RESPECT TO THE
FOLLOWING SENTENCE: "AN EXCHANGE TO ANY MORGAN STANLEY FUND (EXCEPT
A MONEY MARKET FUND) IS MADE ON THE BASIS OF THE NEXT CALCULATED
NET ASSET VALUES OF THE FUNDS INVOLVED AFTER THE EXCHANGE
INSTRUCTIONS ARE ACCEPTED." [EMPHASIS ADDED]
Response 11. The disclosure has been so revised.
COMMENT 12. EXPLAIN SUPPLEMENTALLY WHETHER THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE INCLUDED
UNDER "THE FUND-FUND-MANAGEMENT" IS CONSISTENT WITH ITEM 5(A)(2)
AND ITEM 15(A) OF FORM N-1A: "THE COMPOSITION OF THE TEAM MAY
CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE FROM TIME TO TIME."
Response 12. Item 5(a)(2) requires disclosure of the persons
"primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the
Fund's portfolio ("Portfolio Manager")," and Item 15(a)
requires certain disclosure regarding such persons'
management of other accounts. The Fund is managed by a team
of investment professionals. The team may be comprised of
persons "primarily responsible for the day-to-day management
of the Fund's portfolio" (any such persons are disclosed
under Item 5(a)(2) and Item 15(a)) and persons who are not.
The referenced disclosure states that the composition of the
team may change without notice from time to time. We note
supplementally that to the extent that a team member with
primary responsibility for the day-to-day management of the
Fund's portfolio changes, the Fund intends to supplement its
Prospectus and its Statement of Additional Information with
the information required by Item 5(a) (2) and Item 15 (a)
for such team member.
4
COMMENTS TO THE SAI
-------------------
COMMENT 13. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT INCLUDES APPLICABLE
DISCLOSURE REGARDING "SEGREGATING ASSETS" IN CONNECTION WITH THE
FUND'S USE OF DERIVATIVES.
Response 13. The Fund's registration statement contains this
disclosure.
COMMENT 14. IN THE SECTION ENTITLED "FUND MANAGEMENT - PORTFOLIO MANAGER
COMPENSATION STRUCTURE," INCLUDE ONLY THE DISCRETIONARY
COMPENSATION RECEIVED BY THE PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF THE FUND DURING
THE LAST YEAR.
Response 14. We believe the current disclosure is in
compliance with SEC Release 2004-89. This Release requires
that the SAI include disclosure regarding the structure of,
and the method used to determine, the compensation of its
portfolio managers. The Release notes that the purpose of
this disclosure is to help investors better understand a
portfolio manager's incentives in managing a fund and shed
light on possible conflicts of interest that could arise
when a portfolio manager manages other accounts. Therefore,
in order to achieve this purpose, the disclosure, in our
view, should include all possible forms of compensation that
are available to the portfolio manager in connection with
managing the portfolio and other accounts.
COMMENT 15. PLEASE REVISE THE "DISCLOSURE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS" SECTION TO (I)
CLARIFY WHAT TIME LAG THERE IS WITH RESPECT TO DISSEMINATION OF
PUBLIC PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION, (II) CLARIFY WHICH
EXEMPTIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE POLICY EXIST AND (III) INCLUDE AN
EXHAUSTIVE LIST OF THOSE PERSONS WHO MAY RECEIVE NON-PUBLIC
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION WITHOUT ENTERING INTO A
NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT. PLEASE SUPPLEMENTALLY DISCUSS WHY PERSONS
WHO OWE A DUTY OF TRUST OR CONFIDENCE TO THE FUND MAY RECEIVE
NON-PUBLIC PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION WITHOUT ENTERING INTO A
NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE A LIST OF ALL ONGOING
ARRANGEMENTS.
Response 15. With respect to clause (i), we respectfully
acknowledge the comment, but believe the