SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

Correspondence 0001137439-24-001106 from Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II (VKI) (CIK 0000908993) (VKI)

Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II (VKI) (CIK 0000908993)
Date: June 26, 2024 · CIK: 0000908993 · Accession: 0001137439-24-001106

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 811-02090, 811-05597, 811-05769, 811-06362, 811-06471, 811-06537, 811-06567, 811-06590, 811-06591, 811-07398, 811-07404, 811-07868, 811-08743, 811-23251

Date
June 26, 2024
Author
/s/ Mena Larmour
Form
CORRESP
Company
Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II (VKI) (CIK 0000908993)

Letter

CIK No. 0000883265; 1940 Act No. 811-06537 Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust CIK No. 0000885601; 1940 Act No. 811-06590 (each of the above, a “Fund”)

Dear Mr. Worthington:

On behalf of the above-referenced Funds, submitted herewith under the EDGAR system, are the Funds’ responses to the comments of the staff (the “Staff”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) that you communicated to Mena Larmour on June 25, 2024 with regard to the Preliminary Proxy Statement and other materials (the “Proxy Statement”). The Proxy Statement was filed with the SEC on June 17, 2024. The Proxy Statement relates to the Joint

Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Funds and Joint Special Meeting of Shareholders of the Funds, each scheduled to be held on August 29, 2024.

Each comment from the Staff is summarized below, followed by the Funds’ response to the comment. Terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth for that term in the Proxy Statement.

1.

Comment: Where applicable, please briefly outline shareholder rights of appraisal or similar rights of dissenters with respect to any matter to be acted upon and indicate any procedures required to be followed by dissenting security holders in order to perfect such rights, including any deadlines. If shareholders do not have appraisal rights, please affirmatively so state in the Proxy Statement.

Response: Disclosure indicating that the shareholders have no appraisal rights with respect to their shares will be added to the “Voting at the Meetings” section of the Proxy Statement.

2.

Comment: Please state supplementally which two trustees of the Funds are elected solely by the Preferred Shareholders of the applicable Funds in accordance with Section 18(a)(2)(C) of the 1940 Act.

Response: The Funds confirm that Anthony J. LaCava, Jr. and Prema Mathai-Davis are elected solely by the Preferred Shareholders of the applicable Funds.

3.

Comment: In the section titled “Important Information To Help You Understand and Vote on the Proposals” under the question “Proposal 2 of the Second Meeting – What Are These Non-Standard Fundamental Investment Restrictions,” please clarify which state securities laws or other regulatory authorities are outdated or no longer effective.

Response: The Funds have revised the disclosure as requested.

4.

Comment: Under the section titled “Voting at the Meetings – Broker Non-Votes,” the Staff notes that the Second Meeting relates entirely to non-routine matters. Please amend the disclosure to note that if a beneficial owner of a Fund does not provide voting instructions to the broker with respect to the Proposals in the Second Meeting, the broker cannot give a proxy and such shares will not be counted as present for quorum purposes.

Response: The Funds respectfully note that pursuant to the Funds’ governing documents, broker non-votes do not represent votes cast for a proposal but will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. Specifically, Article IV, Section 11 of each Fund’s Amended and Restated Bylaws states “At any meeting of Shareholders, the [Fund] will consider broker non-votes, if any, as ‘entitled to vote,’ and therefore present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the meeting and the percentage of outstanding Shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting.” Additionally, the Funds are not in a position to opine on whether a broker is permitted or not permitted to return a proxy card, and therefore respectfully decline to make the proposed change.

5.

Comment: Please provide information regarding the principal underwriter of the Funds, including the underwriter’s name and address.

Response: The Funds respectfully submit that they do not have a current principal underwriter.

6.

Comment: Please confirm that, if the Standard Restriction Proposals are approved, each Fund’s registration statement will explain for each fundamental policy what is currently required or permitted by the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, or by the interpretive guidance thereof by the SEC or SEC staff.

Response: Each Fund confirms that it will add the requested disclosure in any future registration statements filed by the Fund.

Please direct questions or comments relating to the above to me at 215-564-8014 or Jennifer Hillman at 215-564-8623.

Very truly yours,
/s/ Mena Larmour

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

                Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP

                2005 Market Street, Suite 2600

                Philadelphia, PA  19103

                Telephone  215.564.8000

                Fax  215.564.8120

              June 26, 2024

    Filed via EDGAR

    Mr. Timothy Worthington

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

    100 F Street, NE

    Washington, DC 20549

            Re:

            Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II

                 CIK No. 0000908993; 1940 Act No. 811-07868

            Invesco Bond Fund

                 CIK No. 0000005094; 1940 Act No. 811-02090

            Invesco California Value Municipal Income Trust

                 CIK No. 0000895531; 1940 Act No. 811-07404

            Invesco High Income 2024 Target Term Fund

                CIK No. 0001698508; 1940 Act No. 811-23251

            Invesco High Income Trust II

                 CIK No. 0000846671; 1940 Act No. 811-05769

            Invesco Municipal Income Opportunities Trust

                CIK No. 0000835333; 1940 Act No. 811-05597

            Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust

                 CIK No. 0000884152; 1940 Act No. 811-06567

            Invesco Municipal Trust

                 CIK No. 0000877463; 1940 Act No. 811-06362

            Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust

                 CIK No. 0000895528; 1940 Act No. 811-07398

            Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

                 CIK No. 0000885125; 1940 Act No. 811-06591

            Invesco Senior Income Trust

                 CIK No. 0001059386; 1940 Act No. 811-08743

            Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals

                 CIK No. 0000880892; 1940 Act No. 811-06471

            Invesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals

                 CIK No.  0000883265; 1940 Act No. 811-06537

            Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust

                 CIK No. 0000885601; 1940 Act No. 811-06590

                 (each of the above, a “Fund”)

    Dear Mr. Worthington:

    On behalf of the above-referenced Funds, submitted herewith under the EDGAR system, are the Funds’ responses to the comments of the
      staff (the “Staff”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) that you communicated to Mena Larmour on June 25, 2024 with regard to the Preliminary Proxy Statement and other materials (the “Proxy Statement”).  The Proxy Statement was
      filed with the SEC on June 17, 2024. The Proxy Statement relates to the Joint

    Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Funds and Joint Special Meeting of Shareholders of the Funds, each scheduled to be held on August
      29, 2024.

    Each comment from the Staff is summarized below, followed by the Funds’ response to the comment.  Terms not defined herein shall have
      the meaning set forth for that term in the Proxy Statement.

            1.

            Comment: Where applicable, please briefly outline shareholder rights of
                appraisal or similar rights of dissenters with respect to any matter to be acted upon and indicate any procedures required to be followed by dissenting security holders in order to perfect such rights, including any deadlines. If
                shareholders do not have appraisal rights, please affirmatively so state in the Proxy Statement.

            Response: Disclosure indicating that the shareholders have no appraisal rights with respect to
                their shares will be added to the “Voting at the Meetings” section of the Proxy Statement.

            2.

            Comment:  Please state supplementally which
                two trustees of the Funds are elected solely by the Preferred Shareholders of the applicable Funds in accordance with Section 18(a)(2)(C) of the 1940 Act.

            Response:  The Funds confirm that Anthony J.
                LaCava, Jr. and Prema Mathai-Davis are elected solely by the Preferred Shareholders of the applicable Funds.

            3.

            Comment: In the section titled “Important
                Information To Help You Understand and Vote on the Proposals” under the question “Proposal 2 of the Second Meeting – What Are These Non-Standard Fundamental Investment Restrictions,” please clarify which state securities laws or other
                regulatory authorities are outdated or no longer effective.

            Response: The Funds have revised the disclosure as
                requested.

            4.

            Comment:  Under the section titled “Voting
                at the Meetings – Broker Non-Votes,” the Staff notes that the Second Meeting relates entirely to non-routine matters. Please amend the disclosure to note that if a beneficial owner of a Fund does not provide voting instructions to the
                broker with respect to the Proposals in the Second Meeting, the broker cannot give a proxy and such shares will not be counted as present for quorum purposes.

            Response:  The Funds respectfully note that
                pursuant to the Funds’ governing documents, broker non-votes do not represent votes cast for a proposal but will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. Specifically, Article IV, Section 11 of each Fund’s Amended
                and Restated Bylaws states “At any meeting of Shareholders, the [Fund] will consider broker non-votes, if any, as ‘entitled to vote,’ and therefore present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the meeting and the
                percentage of outstanding Shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting.” Additionally, the Funds are not in a position to opine on whether a broker is permitted or not permitted to return a proxy card, and
                therefore respectfully decline to make the proposed change.

            5.

            Comment: Please provide information regarding the
                principal underwriter of the Funds, including the underwriter’s name and address.

            Response: The Funds respectfully submit that they
                do not have a current principal underwriter.

            6.

            Comment:  Please confirm that, if the
                Standard Restriction Proposals are approved, each Fund’s registration statement will explain for each fundamental policy what is currently required or permitted by the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, or by the
                interpretive guidance thereof by the SEC or SEC staff.

            Response:  Each Fund confirms that it will add the
                requested disclosure in any future registration statements filed by the Fund.

      2

    Please direct questions or comments relating to the above to me at 215-564-8014 or Jennifer Hillman at 215-564-8623.

                Very truly yours,

                /s/ Mena Larmour

                Mena Larmour

  3