SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for STANDARD DIVERSIFIED INC. (CIK 0000911649) — Jun 10, 2005

STANDARD DIVERSIFIED INC. (CIK 0000911649)
Date: June 10, 2005 · CIK: 0000911649 · Accession: 0000000000-05-028993

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 000-22400

Referenced dates: May 20, 2005

Date
June 10, 2005
Author
John Cash
Form
UPLOAD
Company
STANDARD DIVERSIFIED INC. (CIK 0000911649)

Letter

Mail Stop 0510 June 10, 2005 Mr. Anthony J. Simonetta Strategic Diagnostics Inc. 111 Pencader Drive Newark, Deleware 19702

RE: Strategic Diagnostics Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 Filed March 30, 2005 File No. 000-22400

Dear Mr. Simonetta:

We have reviewed your response letter dated May 20, 2005 and have the following additional comments. If you disagree, we will consider your explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with supplemental information so we may better understand your disclosure. After reviewing this information, we may or may not raise additional comments.

FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

Year Ended December 31, 2003 versus year ended December 31, 2002 - Non-GAAP Financial Measures, page 30 1. We note your response to our prior comment two. However, we believe that since you chose to represent the measure "adjusted net income" for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 to highlight the one time event of inventory write downs you should also provide similar disclosure for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 so that readers have transparent disclosures with regard to how your inventory write down in 2003 impacted your results of operations in 2004. Please revise your disclosures as necessary.

Critical Accounting Policies - Deferred Taxes, page 34 2. We note your response to our prior comment three. However, given that your deferred tax assets are a significant portion of your total assets, we believe that it is important to fully discuss the impact of your assumptions and judgments relating to the realizablity of this asset within your critical accounting policy section. Therefore, as previously requested, expand your disclosures to address the amount and timing of your projected future taxable income necessary to fully utilize your net operating loss carry forwards.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, page F-6

Revenue Recognition, page F-8 3. We note your response to our prior comment six. Given that the sale of immunoassay-based test kits and the sale of certain antibodies and immunochemical reagents can in some instances include both products and services, it is unclear to us why more than one deliverable does not exist. In this regard, we note in your response to our prior comment eight that you occasionally provide services related to the housing of animals. Please provide us with a more comprehensive description of the nature of your arrangements so that we may better understand why you do not believe the guidance in EITF 00-21 does not apply. 4. We note your response to our prior comment seven. It remains unclear to us why it is appropriate to recognize revenues related to the sale of certain antibodies and immunochemical reagents under the percentage of completion method of accounting. Specifically address for us how the nature of your contracts falls within the scope of Statement of Position (SOP) 81-1. Please tell us how you have considered footnote 1 in paragraph 11 and paragraphs 13 and 14 of this guidance in determining whether your contracts fall within the scope of SOP 81-1. In addition, specifically tell us (i) the nature of the deliverables in these contracts, (ii) whether these contracts call for the completion of certain tasks or simply the delivery of the antibodies or immunochemical reagents, (iii) whether these contracts are best-efforts type contracts and (iv) whether your right to receive payments depend on the successful production of the custom antibodies and reagents.

* * * *

As appropriate, please respond to these comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide us with a response. Please furnish a letter that keys your responses to our comments and provides any requested supplemental information. Detailed response letters greatly facilitate our review. Please file your response letter on EDGAR. Please understand that we may have additional comments after reviewing your responses to our comments.

If you have any questions regarding these comments, please direct them to Patricia Armelin, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551-3747, Jeanne Baker at (202) 551-3691 or, in their absence, to the undersigned at (202) 551-3768.

Sincerely,
John Cash
Accounting Branch Chief

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>

Mail Stop 0510

                                                June 10, 2005

Mr. Anthony J. Simonetta
Strategic Diagnostics Inc.
111 Pencader Drive
Newark, Deleware 19702

	RE:	Strategic Diagnostics Inc.
      Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004
      Filed March 30, 2005
      File No. 000-22400

Dear Mr. Simonetta:

      We have reviewed your response letter dated May 20, 2005 and
have the following additional comments.  If you disagree, we will
consider your explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable.
In
some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with
supplemental
information so we may better understand your disclosure.  After
reviewing this information, we may or may not raise additional
comments.

FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

Year Ended December 31, 2003 versus year ended December 31, 2002 -
Non-GAAP Financial Measures, page 30
1. We note your response to our prior comment two.  However, we
believe that since you chose to represent the measure "adjusted
net
income" for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 to highlight
the
one time event of inventory write downs you should also provide
similar disclosure for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004
so
that readers have transparent disclosures with regard to how your
inventory write down in 2003 impacted your results of operations
in
2004.   Please revise your disclosures as necessary.

Critical Accounting Policies - Deferred Taxes, page 34
2. We note your response to our prior comment three.  However,
given
that your deferred tax assets are a significant portion of your
total
assets, we believe that it is important to fully discuss the
impact of
your assumptions and judgments relating to the realizablity of
this
asset within your critical accounting policy section.  Therefore,
as
previously requested, expand your disclosures to address the
amount
and timing of your projected future taxable income necessary to
fully
utilize your net operating loss carry forwards.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, page F-6

Revenue Recognition, page F-8
3. We note your response to our prior comment six.  Given that the
sale of immunoassay-based test kits and the sale of certain
antibodies
and immunochemical reagents can in some instances include both
products and services, it is unclear to us why more than one
deliverable does not exist.  In this regard, we note in your
response
to our prior comment eight that you occasionally provide services
related to the housing of animals.  Please provide us with a more
comprehensive description of the nature of your arrangements so
that
we may better understand why you do not believe the guidance in
EITF
00-21 does not apply.
4. We note your response to our prior comment seven.  It remains
unclear to us why it is appropriate to recognize revenues related
to
the sale of certain antibodies and immunochemical reagents under
the
percentage of completion method of accounting.  Specifically
address
for us how the nature of your contracts falls within the scope of
Statement of Position (SOP) 81-1.   Please tell us how you have
considered footnote 1 in paragraph 11 and paragraphs 13 and 14 of
this
guidance in determining whether your contracts fall within the
scope
of SOP 81-1.  In addition, specifically tell us (i) the nature of
the
deliverables in these contracts, (ii) whether these contracts call
for
the completion of certain tasks or simply the delivery of the
antibodies or immunochemical reagents, (iii) whether these
contracts
are best-efforts type contracts and (iv) whether your right to
receive
payments depend on the successful production of the custom
antibodies
and reagents.

*    *    *    *

      As appropriate, please respond to these comments within 10
business days or tell us when you will provide us with a response.
Please furnish a letter that keys your responses to our comments
and
provides any requested supplemental information.  Detailed
response
letters greatly facilitate our review.  Please file your response
letter on EDGAR.  Please understand that we may have additional
comments after reviewing your  responses to our comments.

     If you have any questions regarding these comments, please
direct
them to Patricia Armelin, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551-3747,
Jeanne
Baker at (202) 551-3691 or, in their absence, to the undersigned
at
(202) 551-3768.

            Sincerely,

                  John Cash
                  Accounting Branch Chief

??

??

??

??

Mr. Anthony J. Simonetta
Strategic Diagnostics Inc.
June 10, 2005
Page 1

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-0510

         DIVISION OF
CORPORATION FINANCE

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>