SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for UFP INDUSTRIES INC (UFPI) (CIK 0000912767) (UFPI) — Nov 17, 2010

UFP INDUSTRIES INC (UFPI) (CIK 0000912767)
Date: Nov. 17, 2010 · CIK: 0000912767 · Accession: 0000000000-10-068802

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Referenced dates: October 8, 2010

Date
November 17, 2010
Author
Pamela Long
Form
UPLOAD
Company
UFP INDUSTRIES INC (UFPI) (CIK 0000912767)

Letter

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 -4631 DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE November 17, 2010 Michael R. Cole Chief Financial Officer Universal Forest Products, Inc. 2801 East Beltline NE Grand Rapids, MI 49525

RE: Universal Forest Products, Inc. Form 10 -K for the F iscal Year E nded December 26, 2009 Filed February 23, 2010 Definitive Proxy Stateme nt on Schedule 14A filed March 4 , 2010 Form 10- Q for the Quarterly Period Ended September 25, 2010 Filed October 20, 2010 File No. 000 -22684

Dear Mr. Cole:

We have reviewed your filing s and have the following comments.

Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A

Executive Compensation, page 12

Compensation Discussion and Analys is, page 12

Compensation Program Components, page 13

Base Salaries, page 13

1. We note from your response to comment nine in our letter dated October 8, 2010. Please clarify for us how Mr. Webster’s January 1, 2010 increase was attributable to his promotion to president on January 1, 2009. In this regard, we note again that you increased Mr. Webster’s salary in 2009 in connection with the promotion. Your re sponse suggests to us that in connection with the January 1, 2010 increase you performed a market check to determine the competitiveness of Mr. Webster’s salary and, having determined that his salary “was well below the range of peer group compensation levels,” you increased his salary. If this interpretation is accurate, it would suggest that the January 1, 2010 increase was more immediately attributable to the market check than to Mr. Webster’s promotion to president on January 1, 2009.

Michael R. Cole Universal Forest Products, Inc. November 17, 2010 Page 2

Annual Incentive Compensation, page 14

2. We note your response to comment 10 in our letter dated October 8, 2010. With a view toward disclosure in future filings, please address the following with respect to your annual incentive compensation plan:

• Please disclose the range of amounts, expressed as percentages of pre- bonus operating profit, that you could have contributed to your corporate Business Unit bonus pool. • Please disclose the actual fixed percentage of your pre- bonus operating profit that wa s allocated to your corporate Business Unit bonus pool, and explain how this number was calculated based on your pre -bonus Return on Investment (ROI).

• Please disclose the actual amount of your pre -bonus ROI.

• Please show us a revised version of your table on page 15, which should disclose each named executive officers’ targeted and actual percentage allocation of his respective bonus pool. Based on your response, a majority of your named executive officers appears to have received an allocation from the corporate Business Unit bonus pool rather than from an amount composed of all of the company bonus pools.

Long -Term Stock Incentive Plans, page 16

3. We note your response to comment 11 in our letter dated October 8, 2010. With a view toward disclosure in future filings, please clarify what you mean by your statement that “[t]he relative amount of shares subject to each award is based upon each executive’s job classification.”

Form 10- Q for the Quarterly Period Ended September 25, 2010

Exhibits 31.1(a) and (b)

4. We note your response to comment 12 in our letter dated October 8, 2010, and reissue this comment. As previously requested, with your future filings, please file your certifications exactly as set forth in Item 601(b)(31)(i) of Regulation S -K without the word “quarterly” in paragraph 2.

Michael R. Cole Universal Forest Products, Inc. November 17, 2010 Page 3 In responding to our comments, please provide a written statement from the company acknowledging that:

• the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; • staff commen ts or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

• the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any pe rson under the federal securities laws of the United States. In addition, please be advised that the Division of Enforcement has access to all information you provide to the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance in our review of your filing or in response to our comments on your filing.

You may contact Hagen Ganem , Staff Attorney, at (202) 551- 3330 or, in his absence, Dietrich King , Staff Attorney, at (202) 551- 3338, with any questions .

Sincerely,
Pamela Long
Assistant Director

Show Raw Text
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 -4631

       DIVISION OF
CORPORATION FINANCE

       November 17, 2010

Michael R. Cole Chief Financial Officer
Universal Forest Products, Inc.
2801 East Beltline NE
Grand Rapids, MI 49525

 RE: Universal Forest Products, Inc.
  Form 10 -K for the F iscal Year E nded December 26, 2009
Filed February 23, 2010
Definitive Proxy Stateme nt on Schedule 14A filed March 4 , 2010
Form 10- Q for the Quarterly Period Ended September 25, 2010
Filed October 20, 2010
File No. 000 -22684

Dear Mr. Cole:

We have reviewed your filing s and have the following comments.

Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A

Executive Compensation, page 12

Compensation Discussion and Analys is, page 12

Compensation Program Components, page 13

Base Salaries, page 13

1. We note from your response to comment nine in our letter dated October 8, 2010.  Please clarify for us how Mr. Webster’s January 1, 2010 increase was attributable to his promotion to president on January 1, 2009.  In this regard, we note again that you increased Mr. Webster’s salary in 2009 in connection with the promotion.  Your re sponse suggests to us that in connection with the January 1,
2010 increase you performed a market check to determine the competitiveness of Mr. Webster’s salary and, having determined that his salary “was well below the range of peer group compensation levels,” you increased his salary.  If this
interpretation is accurate, it would suggest that the January 1, 2010 increase was
more immediately attributable to the market check than to Mr. Webster’s promotion to president on January 1, 2009.

Michael R. Cole
Universal Forest Products, Inc.
November 17, 2010
Page 2

Annual Incentive Compensation, page 14

2. We note your response to comment 10 in our letter dated October 8, 2010.  With a view toward disclosure in future filings, please address the following with respect to your annual incentive compensation plan:

• Please disclose the range of amounts, expressed as percentages of pre- bonus
operating profit, that you could have contributed to your corporate Business
Unit bonus pool.
• Please disclose the actual fixed percentage of your pre- bonus operating profit
that wa s allocated to your corporate Business Unit bonus pool, and explain
how this number was calculated based on your pre -bonus Return on
Investment (ROI).

• Please disclose the actual amount of your pre -bonus ROI.

• Please show us a revised version of your table on page 15, which should
disclose each named executive officers’ targeted and actual percentage
allocation of his respective bonus pool.  Based on your response, a majority of your named executive officers appears to have received an allocation from the corporate Business Unit bonus pool rather than from an amount composed of
all of the company bonus pools.

Long -Term Stock Incentive Plans, page 16

3. We note your response to comment 11 in our letter dated October 8, 2010.  With a view toward disclosure in future filings, please clarify what you mean by your statement that “[t]he relative amount of shares subject to each award is based upon each executive’s job classification.”

Form 10- Q for the Quarterly Period Ended September 25, 2010

Exhibits 31.1(a) and (b)

4. We note your response to comment 12 in our letter dated October 8, 2010, and reissue this comment.  As previously requested, with your future filings, please
file your certifications exactly as set forth in Item 601(b)(31)(i) of Regulation S -K
without  the word “quarterly” in paragraph 2.

Michael R. Cole
Universal Forest Products, Inc.
November 17, 2010
Page 3
  In responding to our comments, please provide  a written statement from the
company acknowledging that:

• the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;
• staff commen ts or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

• the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any pe rson under the federal securities laws of the
United States.
 In addition, please be advised that the Division of Enforcement has access to all
information you provide to the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance in our review of your filing or in response to our comments on your filing.

You may contact Hagen Ganem , Staff Attorney, at (202) 551- 3330 or, in his
absence,  Dietrich King , Staff Attorney, at (202) 551- 3338, with any questions .

Sincerely,

Pamela Long
Assistant Director