SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for PETRO FINANCIAL CORP (CIK 0000919953) — Jun 20, 2005

PETRO FINANCIAL CORP (CIK 0000919953)
Date: June 20, 2005 · CIK: 0000919953 · Accession: 0000000000-05-031165

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 333-25189, 333-87371, 333-87372

Referenced dates: April 29, 2005, April 29, 2005, May 13, 2005

Date
June 20, 2005
Author
??
Form
UPLOAD
Company
PETRO FINANCIAL CORP (CIK 0000919953)

Letter

June 20, 2005 By Facsimile and U.S. Mail Mr. J.A. Cardwell, Sr. Petro Stopping Centers Holdings, L.P. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 6080 Surety Drive El Paso, TX 79905

Re: Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 Filed October 29, 2004 File No`s. 1-13018, 333-87372, 333-87371-01 and 333-25189-01

Dear Mr. Cardwell:

We have reviewed your response dated May 13, 2005 to our comment letter dated April 29, 2005 and have the following additional comments. Please understand that the purpose of our review is to assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing. We look forward to working with you in these respects. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this letter.

General

1. Please file a copy of the redacted version of your response letter dated May 13, 2005 on EDGAR as correspondence.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, page 26 Consolidated Balance Sheets, page 26

2. We note your response to comment 4 in our letter dated April 29, 2005. In consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances and the accounting guidance issued subsequent to ASR 268 we presently view these instruments to be within the scope of SFAS No. 150. Please refer to the Scope section of EITF Topic No. D-98.

3. We note the conditional redemption existing with the call option held by PSCH expired on August 1, 2002. When this conversion option expired the warrants were no longer conditional obligations and became mandatorily redeemable on October 1, 2009, a specified and determinable date. See paragraph A9. of SFAS No. 150. Please advise or amend your Form 10-K as of December 31, 2004 to revise your consolidated financial statements and related disclosures to present the warrants as liabilities measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 150. Include the disclosures required by paragraph 37 of APB No. 20.

4. We note your response to comment 5 in our letter dated April 29, 2005. You indicate Mobil Long Haul, the holder of the Class B Preferred Partnership, holds the option to convert the preferred partnership interests into common interests in PSCH at any time prior to the mandatory redemption date. The option to convert Class B Preferred Partnership interests into a 3.9% common partnership interest is a conditional obligation held by Mobil Long Haul, since it was known at inception and requires you to settle in a fixed monetary amount. The mandatory redemption on the tenth anniversary of the 1999 transaction is an unconditional obligation within the scope of SFAS No. 150 and ASR 268 is no longer applicable. The presence of both the conditional and unconditional obligations noted above would require the instrument to be presented as a liability and measured at fair value within the scope of paragraph 12(a) SFAS No. 150. Please advise or amend your Form 10-K as of December 31, to revise your consolidated financial statements and related disclosures to present the Class B Preferred Partnership interest as a liability measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 150. Include the disclosures required by paragraph 37 of APB No. 20.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, page 22

5. We note your response to comments 8 and 16 in our letter dated April 29, 2005. Please clarify the accounting treatment for purchased receivables included in your response. Please tell us how you account for your purchase of receivables from your franchise locations in accordance with SFAS No. 140, or another applicable accounting pronouncement. Include the following in your response: * Please tell us if both you and your franchisees meet all of the conditions of sale accounting and your present accounting treatment for the purchased receivables. See paragraphs 9 - 11 of SFAS No. 140; * If you account for the transfer of assets as a sale, please tell us the amount of gains or losses recognized on the purchase of receivables and their classification in your statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002; * Or, tell us if both you and your franchisees account for purchased receivables as secured borrowings including your consideration of the criteria preventing you from applying sale accounting. See paragraph 15 of SFAS No. 140; and * In your response, please show us what your revised disclosure will look like for the related party effects of the transfer of assets. See SFAS No. 57. In your response please illustrate the journal entries for you and your franchisees for the sales, purchases, gain recognition and cash collections on receivables including the classifications for these entries in your balance sheet and statements of operations and cash flows. Also, please clarify whether or not the company owned Petro locations record revenue in your consolidated statements of operations for the sales of merchandise or services to third party customers generated at Petro franchise locations.

(18) Subsequent Events, page 53

6. We note your response to comment 17 in our letter dated April 29, 2005. Please confirm your analysis of the Blue Beacon and Bordentown locations includes all four acquisitions disclosed in your footnote. Further, please tell us what consideration you gave to aggregating acquisitions from a single franchisee in consideration of the criteria "under common control or management" in Rule 3- 05(a)(3)(i) of Regulation S-X. In this regard, we note from your disclosure on page 53 that at least 2 of the acquisitions were from one franchisee. Please advise us if the Blue Beacon and Bordentown acquisitions were from one franchisee. If so, on an aggregated basis your analysis indicates the acquisitions exceed the prescribed threshold. Please advise or revise your filing as appropriate.

Please send us your response to our comment within 10 business days from the date of this letter or tell us when you will provide us with a response. Please understand that we may have additional comments after reviewing your response to our comments. Your supplemental response letter should be submitted in electronic form on EDGAR as a correspondence file. Refer to Rule 101(a) of Regulation S-T.

If you have any questions regarding our comment, please direct them to Brian V. McAllister at (202) 551-3341 or, Donna Di Silvio at (202) 551-3202, or in her absence to the undersigned at (202) 551-3841 if you have any questions regarding our comment on the financial statements.

Sincerely,
Michael Moran
Accounting Branch
Chief
??

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>

Mail Stop 3-8

      							 June 20, 2005

By Facsimile and U.S. Mail

Mr. J.A. Cardwell, Sr.
Petro Stopping Centers Holdings, L.P.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
6080 Surety Drive
El Paso, TX 79905

      Re:    Form 10-K for the Year Ended
      	December 31, 2004
                Filed October 29, 2004
      	File No`s.  1-13018, 333-87372,
      	   333-87371-01 and 333-25189-01

Dear Mr. Cardwell:

	We have reviewed your response dated May 13, 2005 to our
comment
letter dated April 29, 2005 and have the following additional
comments.   Please understand that the purpose of our review is to
assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure
requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing.
We look forward to working with you in these respects.  Feel free
to
call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this letter.

General

1. Please file a copy of the redacted version of your response
letter
dated May 13, 2005 on EDGAR as correspondence.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, page 26
Consolidated Balance Sheets, page 26

2. We note your response to comment 4 in our letter dated April
29,
2005.  In consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances
and
the accounting guidance issued subsequent to ASR 268 we presently
view these instruments to be within the scope of SFAS No. 150.
Please refer to the Scope section of EITF Topic No. D-98.

3. We note the conditional redemption existing with the call
option
held by PSCH expired on August 1, 2002.  When this conversion
option
expired the warrants were no longer conditional obligations and
became mandatorily redeemable on October 1, 2009, a specified and
determinable date.  See paragraph A9. of SFAS No. 150.  Please
advise
or amend your Form 10-K as of December 31, 2004 to revise your
consolidated financial statements and related disclosures to
present
the warrants as liabilities measured at fair value in accordance
with
SFAS No. 150. Include the disclosures required by paragraph 37 of
APB
No. 20.

4. We note your response to comment 5 in our letter dated April
29,
2005.  You indicate Mobil Long Haul, the holder of the Class B
Preferred Partnership, holds the option to convert the preferred
partnership interests into common interests in PSCH at any time
prior
to the mandatory redemption date.  The option to convert Class B
Preferred Partnership interests into a 3.9% common partnership
interest is a conditional obligation held by Mobil Long Haul,
since
it was known at inception and requires you to settle in a fixed
monetary amount.  The mandatory redemption on the tenth
anniversary
of the 1999 transaction is an unconditional obligation within the
scope of SFAS No. 150 and ASR 268 is no longer applicable.  The
presence of both the conditional and unconditional obligations
noted
above would require the instrument to be presented as a liability
and
measured at fair value within the scope of paragraph 12(a) SFAS
No.
150.   Please advise or amend your Form 10-K as of December 31,
2004
to revise your consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures to present the Class B Preferred Partnership interest
as
a liability measured at fair value in accordance with SFAS No.
150.
Include the disclosures required by paragraph 37 of APB No. 20.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, page 22

5. We note your response to comments 8 and 16 in our letter dated
April 29, 2005.  Please clarify the accounting treatment for
purchased receivables included in your response. Please tell us
how
you account for your purchase of receivables from your franchise
locations in accordance with SFAS No. 140, or another applicable
accounting pronouncement.  Include the following in your response:
* Please tell us if both you and your franchisees meet all of the
conditions of sale accounting and your present accounting
treatment
for the purchased receivables.  See paragraphs 9 - 11 of SFAS No.
140;
* If you account for the transfer of assets as a sale, please tell
us
the amount of gains or losses recognized on the purchase of
receivables and their classification in your statement of
operations
for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002;
* Or, tell us if both you and your franchisees account for
purchased
receivables as secured borrowings including your consideration of
the
criteria preventing you from applying sale accounting. See
paragraph
15 of SFAS No. 140; and
* In your response, please show us what your revised disclosure
will
look like for the related party effects of the transfer of assets.
See SFAS No. 57.
In your response please illustrate the journal entries for you and
your franchisees for the sales, purchases, gain recognition and
cash
collections on receivables including the classifications for these
entries in your balance sheet and statements of operations and
cash
flows. Also, please clarify whether or not the company owned Petro
locations record revenue in your consolidated statements of
operations for the sales of merchandise or services to third party
customers generated at Petro franchise locations.

(18) Subsequent Events, page 53

6. We note your response to comment 17 in our letter dated April
29,
2005.  Please confirm your analysis of the Blue Beacon and
Bordentown
locations includes all four acquisitions disclosed in your
footnote.
Further, please tell us what consideration you gave to aggregating
acquisitions from a single franchisee in consideration of the
criteria "under common control or management" in Rule 3-
05(a)(3)(i)
of Regulation S-X.  In this regard, we note from your disclosure
on
page 53 that at least 2 of the acquisitions were from one
franchisee.
Please advise us if the Blue Beacon and Bordentown acquisitions
were
from one franchisee.  If so, on an aggregated basis your analysis
indicates the acquisitions exceed the prescribed threshold. Please
advise or revise your filing as appropriate.

	Please send us your response to our comment within 10
business
days from the date of this letter or tell us when you will provide
us
with a response.  Please understand that we may have additional
comments after reviewing your response to our comments.  Your
supplemental response letter should be submitted in electronic
form
on EDGAR as a correspondence file.  Refer to Rule 101(a) of
Regulation S-T.

		If you have any questions regarding our comment, please
direct them to Brian V. McAllister at (202) 551-3341 or, Donna Di
Silvio at (202) 551-3202, or in her absence to the undersigned at
(202) 551-3841 if you have any questions regarding our comment on
the
financial statements.

									Sincerely,

									Michael Moran
									Accounting Branch
Chief
??

??

??

??

Mr. J.A. Cardwell, Sr.
Petro Stopping Centers Holdings LP
June 20, 2005
Page 1

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>