SEC Company Response from GREENBRIER COMPANIES INC (GBX) (CIK 0000923120) (GBX) — Apr 13, 2005
GREENBRIER COMPANIES INC (GBX) (CIK 0000923120)
Date: April 13, 2005 · CIK: 0000923120 · Accession: 0000950124-05-002388
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-13146
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
[Greenbrier Logo] The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
One Centerpointe Drive Suite 200
Lake Oswego Oregon 97035
503 684 7000 Fax 503 684 7553
April 12, 2005
Mr. David R. Humphrey
Branch Chief-Accountant
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20549-0305
Re: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
Form 10-K for the Year Ended August 31, 2004
File No. 001-13146
------------------
Dear Mr. Humphrey:
The following is in response to the comments set forth in your letter of March
23, 2005. For ease of review, the responses are in the same sequence and bear
the same numbering arrangement used in your letter.
Form 10-K for the Year Ended August 31, 2004
--------------------------------------------
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
---------------------------------------------------
Inventories
-----------
1. We intend to provide a schedule or reconciliation of activity in the
lower of cost or market inventory reserve for each period in which an
income statement has been provided, as contemplated by Rule 5-04 of
Regulation S-X. The schedule will initially be provided in the
Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2005.
Maintenance Obligations
-----------------------
2. FTB 90-1 Accounting for separately priced extended warranty and
product maintenance contracts states that revenue from such contracts
should be deferred and recognized in income on a straight line basis
over the contract period, except in those circumstances in which
sufficient historical evidence indicates that the costs of performing
services under the contract are incurred on other than a straight line
basis. In those circumstances, revenue should be recognized over the
contract period in proportion to the costs expected to be incurred in
performing services under the contract.
<PAGE>
Mr. David R. Humphrey
Securities and Exchange Commission
April 12, 2005
Page 2
We believe our accounting for maintenance contracts complies with this
guidance. Over ninety five percent of the revenue Greenbrier earns from
maintenance contracts is derived from "mileage-based" contracts. The
mileage that railcars, subject to the maintenance contract, travel in a
particular time period determines the revenue earned in that period. The
cost incurred in providing maintenance on the railcars varies directly
with mileage traveled. Railcars traveling a high number of miles
generally require more maintenance than those traveling a lower number
of miles in the same timeframe. Accordingly, revenue and margins on
these contracts are recognized over the contract period in proportion to
the costs expected to be incurred in performing the maintenance
services.
Warranty Accruals
-----------------
3. Our response to Comment #12 in your letter of February 14, 2005
indicated there should not be a direct relationship between revenue and
accrued warranty balances. The reason a reader should not necessarily
expect to see a direct correlation between revenues and the accrued
warranty balance is that the balance is affected by reductions or
payments as much as it is affected by additions or accruals.
Warranties covering railcars manufactured by the Company generally
provide for replacement or repair, at the Company's option, of defects
due to workmanship or material for a period from three to five years
following delivery.
Warranty expense or additions to the warranty accruals are initially
based on railcars produced. In North America, the amount has been $350
per railcar for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004.
The European manufacturing facility records warranty expense at 1% of
railcar revenue. Management evaluates the warranty accrual at least
quarterly and if the balance is not considered adequate to cover
estimated warranty costs, an additional amount is accrued.
Railcar deliveries in North America have accounted for approximately 80%
of railcar revenue in the past three years. During that period, the
North American facilities produced primarily intermodal double stack
cars, boxcars and center partition lumber cars. Generally, boxcar prices
are approximately 60% higher than intermodal stack cars and center
partition lumber car prices are approximately 25% higher than intermodal
stack cars. Unit prices can vary within each car type based on customer
requests, competitive influence and other factors.
As the initial warranty accrual is based on an amount per railcar, the
production and sale of a different product mix can change the
relationship between revenue and warranty expense in a given period.
During fiscal 2004, approximately 63% of North American production was
intermodal stack cars, while in fiscal 2003 and 2002 the percentage was
closer to 50%. Center partition lumber cars accounted for approximately
10% of deliveries in fiscal 2004, 22% in fiscal 2003 and 3% in fiscal
2002. Boxcars accounted for approximately 10% of fiscal 2003 deliveries,
19% in fiscal 2002 and none in fiscal 2004.
<PAGE>
European operations produce a greater number of car types and there is
not a readily determinable relationship of prices among the various car
types.
We believe the MD&A disclosures regarding the Company's manufacturing
segment discussing product mix and prices are adequate to inform readers
as to the reasons for fluctuations in manufacturing revenue.
If you have any further questions or comments or would like additional
clarification, please contact me at (503) 598-3815.
Sincerely,
/s/ Larry G. Brady
Larry G. Brady
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
cc: Kenneth D. Stephens, Tonkon Torp LLP
David A. Gorretta, Deloitte & Touche LLP
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>