SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from BANK OF MONTREAL (BMO) — Oct 28, 2013

BANK OF MONTREAL /CAN/ (BMO, BERZ, BNKD, BNKU, BULZ, CARD, CARU, DULL, FLYD, FLYU, FNGD, FNGO, FNGS, FNGU, GDXD, GDXU, JETD) (CIK 0000927971)
Date: Oct. 28, 2013 · CIK: 0000927971 · Accession: 0001193125-13-413317

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-13354

Date
October 28, 2013
Author
/s/ Thomas Flynn
Form
CORRESP
Company
BANK OF MONTREAL /CAN/ (BMO, BERZ, BNKD, BNKU, BULZ, CARD, CARU, DULL, FLYD, FLYU, FNGD, FNGO, FNGS, FNGU, GDXD, GDXU, JETD) (CIK 0000927971)

Letter

Via EDGAR Form 40-F for the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2012 Filed December 4, 2012 Response dated June 21, 2013 File No. 001-13354

Dear Ms. Ciboroski:

I am writing to supplement the Bank of Montreal’s response dated September 13, 2013 specifically to expand our response to your question 3 regarding revolving credit facilities.

In determining the accounting for purchased revolving credit facilities we applied the guidance in IAS 39.47(d) and IAS 18.IE14 (b) as noted in more detail in that response letter. We believe that this is the appropriate accounting literature to apply to the purchased revolving credit facilities. This results in the application of straight line amortization of the credit mark. Given the lack of specific guidance under IFRS, we also reviewed U.S. GAAP for guidance and noted that ASC 310-20-35-23 concludes that straight line amortization is appropriate for revolving lines of credit.

We note that we have done additional analysis to estimate the magnitude of the difference between straight line amortization and effective interest method. Based on that analysis and given the amount of credit mark involved, we have concluded that there would not have been a material impact on our net income had the effective interest method been applied.

We acknowledge that:

•

the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

•

staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

•

the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Sincerely,
/s/ Thomas Flynn

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

CORRESP

 100 King Street West, 18th Floor,

 Toronto, ON M5X
1A1

 October 28, 2013

 Via EDGAR

Stephanie J. Ciboroski

 Senior Assistant Chief Accountant

Security and Exchange Commission

 Washington, D. C. 20549

Re:
Bank of Montreal

 Form 40-F for the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2012

Filed December 4, 2012

Response dated June 21, 2013

File No. 001-13354

 Dear Ms. Ciboroski:

 I am writing to supplement the Bank of Montreal’s response dated September 13, 2013 specifically to expand our response to your question 3
regarding revolving credit facilities.

 In determining the accounting for purchased revolving credit facilities we applied the guidance in IAS 39.47(d) and
IAS 18.IE14 (b) as noted in more detail in that response letter. We believe that this is the appropriate accounting literature to apply to the purchased revolving credit facilities. This results in the application of straight line amortization
of the credit mark. Given the lack of specific guidance under IFRS, we also reviewed U.S. GAAP for guidance and noted that ASC 310-20-35-23 concludes that straight line amortization is appropriate for revolving lines of credit.

We note that we have done additional analysis to estimate the magnitude of the difference between straight line amortization and effective interest method. Based
on that analysis and given the amount of credit mark involved, we have concluded that there would not have been a material impact on our net income had the effective interest method been applied.

We acknowledge that:

•

the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

•

staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

•

the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Thomas Flynn

Thomas Flynn

 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

cc:
Bank of Montreal, Audit and Conduct Review Committee

 KPMG, LLP