SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from REDWOOD TRUST INC (RWT, RWTN, RWTO, RWTP, RWTQ, RWT-PA) (CIK 0000930236) (RWT) — Aug 7, 2012

REDWOOD TRUST INC (RWT, RWTN, RWTO, RWTP, RWTQ, RWT-PA) (CIK 0000930236)
Date: Aug. 7, 2012 · CIK: 0000930236 · Accession: 0001144204-12-043383

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Referenced dates: June 25, 2012

Date
August 7, 2012
Author
Christopher J. Abate
Form
CORRESP
Company
REDWOOD TRUST INC (RWT, RWTN, RWTO, RWTP, RWTQ, RWT-PA) (CIK 0000930236)

Letter

VIA EDGAR Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Division of Corporation Finance Filed on February 27, 2012 Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, Filed on May 8, 2012 File No. 1-13759

Dear Mr. Duc Dang,

On behalf of Redwood Trust, Inc. (“Redwood”), I hereby provide the following supplement to the original response dated July 9, 2012, which was in reply to the Staff’s comment letter dated June 25, 2012 (the “Comment Letter”). The Staff’s comment letter was issued in connection with the above-referenced Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Part of the original response to Comment #3 described the asset-specific measures used at Redwood to evaluate risks associated with our residential loans and securities. While our analysis of these instruments entails a wide range of factors, we do not currently employ asset-specific internal risk rating metrics (other than those described in the original response) to rank the credit risk associated with our residential loans and securities or prospective investments. We employ a broader approach to understanding and managing credit risk based on factors outlined in the original response. As an active investor in credit sensitive mortgage-related investments since 1994, we have used this approach to assess the risks associated with our residential loans and securities without relying on internal or third-party credit ratings. For our commercial loan portfolio, we do employ an internal risk rating methodology to assess asset-specific risks within this portfolio, as summarized in the original response. We disclose this methodology along with our evaluation of our commercial loan portfolio in our quarterly and annual Exchange Act reports.

Part of the original response to Comment #6 described additional disclosures we planned to include in future quarterly and annual Exchange Act reports relating to financial covenants we make to creditors. As a supplement to the original response, Redwood confirms that if at any quarter end (or if at the date of the filing of a quarterly or annual report) management determines there is material risk of noncompliance with a financial covenant, we will disclose in that quarterly or annual report the relevant financial covenant, a quantification of the most recent level of compliance with that financial covenant, any expected trend in our operations and financial condition that would be meaningful in assessing the likelihood of continued compliance (or non-compliance) with that covenant, and the material impacts on our business and operations if a breach of that covenant were to occur. Of course, in the case of a breach of a financial covenant, we would disclose the nature of the breach and the material impacts on our business and operations in that quarterly or annual Exchange Act report. Similarly, any breach of a financial covenant that was to occur during a future quarter, but which was subsequently cured or waived prior to the end of that quarter, would also be disclosed in that quarterly or annual Exchange Act report.

* * *

On behalf of Redwood, I confirm that:

● Redwood is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the above-referenced filings;

● Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and

● Redwood may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Should you have any further comments or questions about this letter, please contact me by telephone at 415-389-7373, by fax at 415-381-1773, or by email at chris.abate@redwoodtrust.com.

Very truly yours,
Redwood Trust, Inc.

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

August 7, 2012

VIA EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

    Attn:
    Duc Dang

    Staff Attorney

    Division of Corporation Finance

    Re:

        Redwood Trust, Inc.

        Responses to Comments on:

        Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
        2011

        Filed on February 27, 2012

        Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31,
        2012

        Filed on May 8, 2012

        File No. 1-13759

Dear Mr. Duc Dang,

On behalf of Redwood Trust, Inc. (“Redwood”),
I hereby provide the following supplement to the original response dated July 9, 2012, which was in reply to the Staff’s
comment letter dated June 25, 2012 (the “Comment Letter”). The Staff’s comment letter was issued in connection
with the above-referenced Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Part of the original response to Comment
#3 described the asset-specific measures used at Redwood to evaluate risks associated with our residential loans and securities.
While our analysis of these instruments entails a wide range of factors, we do not currently employ asset-specific internal risk
rating metrics (other than those described in the original response) to rank the credit risk associated with our residential loans
and securities or prospective investments. We employ a broader approach to understanding and managing credit risk based on factors
outlined in the original response. As an active investor in credit sensitive mortgage-related investments since 1994, we have used
this approach to assess the risks associated with our residential loans and securities without relying on internal or third-party
credit ratings. For our commercial loan portfolio, we do employ an internal risk rating methodology to assess asset-specific risks
within this portfolio, as summarized in the original response. We disclose this methodology along with our evaluation of our commercial
loan portfolio in our quarterly and annual Exchange Act reports.

Part of the original response to Comment
#6 described additional disclosures we planned to include in future quarterly and annual Exchange Act reports relating to financial
covenants we make to creditors. As a supplement to the original response, Redwood confirms that if at any quarter end (or if at
the date of the filing of a quarterly or annual report) management determines there is material risk of noncompliance with a financial
covenant, we will disclose in that quarterly or annual report the relevant financial covenant, a quantification of the most recent
level of compliance with that financial covenant, any expected trend in our operations and financial condition that would be meaningful
in assessing the likelihood of continued compliance (or non-compliance) with that covenant, and the material impacts on our business
and operations if a breach of that covenant were to occur. Of course, in the case of a breach of a financial covenant, we would
disclose the nature of the breach and the material impacts on our business and operations in that quarterly or annual Exchange
Act report. Similarly, any breach of a financial covenant that was to occur during a future quarter, but which was subsequently
cured or waived prior to the end of that quarter, would also be disclosed in that quarterly or annual Exchange Act report.

*   	*	   *

On behalf of Redwood, I confirm that:

 ● Redwood is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy
of the disclosure in the above-referenced filings;

 ● Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response
to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and

 ● Redwood may not assert staff comments as a defense
in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Should you have any further comments or
questions about this letter, please contact me by telephone at 415-389-7373, by fax at 415-381-1773, or by email at chris.abate@redwoodtrust.com.

    Very truly yours,

    Redwood Trust, Inc.

    By:
    /s/ Christopher J.
    Abate

    Christopher J.  Abate

    Chief Financial Officer

 cc: Keith Benson, Latham & Watkins LLP