SEC Company Response from HAMMONS JOHN Q HOTELS INC (CIK 0000930796) — May 13, 2005
HAMMONS JOHN Q HOTELS INC (CIK 0000930796)
Date: May 13, 2005 · CIK: 0000930796 · Accession: 0000950137-05-005976
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: April 22, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
[JQH HOTELS, INC. LETTERHEAD]
May 12, 2005
VIA EDGAR AND FACSIMILE
Ms. Linda Van Doorn
Senior Assistant Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549
Re: Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2004
JOHN Q. HAMMONS HOTELS, INC.
File No. 1-13486
JOHN Q. HAMMONS HOTELS, L.P. AND JOHN Q. HAMMONS HOTELS
FINANCE CORPORATION III
File No. 033-7334001
Dear Ms. Van Doorn:
On behalf of John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc., John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.
and John Q. Hammons Hotels Finance Corporation III (collectively, the
"Company"), I am writing to respond to the comments of the Staff (the "Staff")
of the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Commission") set forth in your letter dated April 22, 2005 with respect to
the above-referenced filings (the "Comment Letter").
For ease of reference, each of the Staff's comments is reproduced below
in its entirety in bold and is followed by the corresponding response.
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
COMMENT 1: PLEASE REFER TO THE FOURTH PARAGRAPH ON PAGE 24 AND CLARIFY
TO US HOW YOU ACCOUNTED FOR THE $12.6 MILLION OF COSTS
INCURRED TO CORRECT THE MOISTURE PROBLEM. WERE THE COSTS
EXPENSED IN THE PERIODS INCURRED? IF NOT, WHAT WAS YOUR BASIS
FOR CAPITALIZING THE COSTS? IN ADDITION, THE NOTE INDICATES
THAT YOU RECOGNIZED THE CUMULATIVE DEPRECIATION CHARGE THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, 2004 OF $7.6 MILLION IN FISCAL YEAR 2001. PLEASE
CLARIFY TO US IN A SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE THE RATIONALE AND
GAAP BASIS FOR THIS ACCOUNTING TREATMENT.
<PAGE>
Ms. Linda Van Doorn
April ____, 2005
Page 2
Response 1: During 2001, the Company received engineering studies which
indicated that defective windows had allowed moisture to seep
into both the exterior skin of the building and the interior
walls in 16 hotels. The Company recognized that the net book
value of these assets was impaired. In 2001, the Company
recorded a charge to depreciation expense of $7.6 million to
reduce the net book value of these assets to zero.
During 2001-2004, the Company expended $12.6 million to
purchase replacement windows, replace the skin on the
buildings, and replace the interior walls. The Company has an
accounting policy on property, plant and equipment that
provides that expenditures for additions, betterments and
renewals are capitalized while maintenance and repair
expenditures, which do not extend productive life, are
expensed as incurred. In accordance with its policy, the
Company capitalized these expenditures as they were
betterments to the buildings
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM, PAGE 47
COMMENT 2 PLEASE CONFIRM TO US THAT YOU HAVE A SIGNED AUDIT OPINION
THAT YOU WILL INCLUDE A CONFORMING SIGNATURE IN FUTURE
FILINGS. REFER TO SECTION 302 OF REGULATION S-T.
Response 2: The Company does have a signed audit opinion for the
financial statements included in the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004. A copy is enclosed with the faxed
copy of this letter for your information. We confirm that the
Company will include a conforming signature in all future
electronic filings.
NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
COMMENT 3: PLEASE PROVIDE US WITH YOUR CONSOLIDATION POLICY AND
UNDERTAKE TO INCLUDE THE POLICY IN FUTURE FILINGS. REFER TO
RULE 3A-03 OF REGULATION S-X.
Response 3: The Company's consolidation policy (which has been included
in prior filings in the first sentence of Note 1, Entity
Matters) is that the consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc. , John Q. Hammons
Hotels L. P. and subsidiaries. The Company notes that it only
has wholly-owned subsidiaries. The
<PAGE>
Ms. Linda Van Doorn
April ____, 2005
Page 3
Company will also include this policy in Note 2, Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies, in future filings.
NOTE 6 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, PAGE 65
COMMENT 4: THE SECOND PARAGRAPH UNDER THIS HEADING INDICATES THAT THE
COMPANY LEASES FACILITIES FROM RELATED PARTIES AT AMOUNTS THAT
APPEAR TO BE BELOW FAIR VALUE SUCH AS THE LEASE FOR WHICH ONLY
NOMINAL AMOUNTS ARE PAID. PLEASE CLARIFY TO US WHAT
CONSIDERATION YOU GAVE TO RECORDING THE FAIR VALUE OF THE
LEASE PAYMENTS AS AN EXPENSE WITH THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE
AMOUNTS PAID AND FAIR VALUE RECORDED AS A CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTION. REFER TO SAB TOPIC 1B AND 5T.
Response 4: The Company leases two trade centers from Mr. John Q.
Hammons ("Mr. Hammons") located in Joplin, Missouri and
Portland, Oregon. The Company believes that under both leases,
its financial statements reflect all of the expenses of
operating the center in accordance with SAB Topic 1B and that
the principal stockholder is not absorbing any costs which
should be reflected in the financial statements in accordance
with SAB Topic 5T.
Portland. The Company pays Mr. Hammons annual rent of
$300,000, and covers all operating expenses, for the trade
center in Portland, Oregon. That facility, immediately
adjacent to our hotel, is located near the airport. There is a
strong market for both convention and conference business in
Portland. The trade center, which collects fees for rentals
and any food and beverage provided, is profitable after rent
expense and operating costs, and also accounts for about 12%
of the occupancy of the attached hotel. The Company believes
the lease arrangement with Mr. Hammons is representative of
market rentals in the Portland area.
Joplin. In contrast, the Joplin trade center is not profitable
for the Company, despite the fact that rent is only $1 per
month.
The Holiday Inn -Joplin was built in 1979 (several years prior
to the formation of the Company). Mr. Hammons owned a piece of
irregularly shaped land near, but not contiguous to the hotel.
In 1992, thirteen years after opening the hotel, Mr. Hammons
built the trade center. The trade center is not attached to
the hotel but is over 100 yards away. Mr.
<PAGE>
Ms. Linda Van Doorn
April ____, 2005
Page 4
Hammons has advised the Company that at the time the trade
center was built, he believed that this was the best use for
this piece of land.
The Company signed a twenty year lease with Mr. Hammons in
1994 for the use of the trade center for rent of $1 per month.
Under the lease, the Company is responsible for all operating
costs as well as any capital expenditures and collects fees
for rentals and any food and beverage provided. The trade
center has never made a profit, and just breaks even despite
the minimal $1 rental payments after giving effect to the
operating costs. Further, related hotel traffic accounts for
less than 5% of the occupancy for the hotel.
Several factors contribute to the limited value of the Joplin
trade center. The Joplin market is much smaller than Portland,
and is not a strong convention or conference location, so
there is not a large market for a trade center-type facility.
In addition, the trade center is not easily accessible from
the nearest highway.
In conclusion, the Joplin trade center is not profitable and
the rent reasonably represents a market rate under these
circumstances. The Company's financial statements reflect all
the costs of operating the trade center under the lease.
Further, Mr. Hammons, the principal stockholder, is not
absorbing any of the costs of operating the trade center. The
business purpose for Mr. Hammons entering into the lease is
that he avoids bearing any costs of operating the facility for
a 20-year period, and can consider alternative uses for the
building at the end of the lease.
* * * * *
In accordance with the request in the Comment Letter, the Company
acknowledges that:
o the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of
the disclosure in the filings;
o Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff
comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any
action with respect to the filings; and
<PAGE>
Ms. Linda Van Doorn
April ____, 2005
Page 5
o the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
federal securities laws of the United States.
Please direct your questions or comments to me at 417-873-3537, or to
Mary Anne O'Connell at 314-480-1715.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Paul E. Mueller
Paul E. Mueller, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
cc: Mr. Thomas Flinn
Staff Accountant
Mail Stop 0409
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>