SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from ACL SEMICONDUCTOR INC (CIK 0000934445) — Dec 2, 2005

ACL SEMICONDUCTOR INC (CIK 0000934445)
Date: Dec. 2, 2005 · CIK: 0000934445 · Accession: 0000930413-05-008031

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Date
December 1, 2005
Author
Not clearly detected
Form
CORRESP
Company
ACL SEMICONDUCTOR INC (CIK 0000934445)

Letter

Re: ACL SEMICONDUCTORS, INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 FORMS 10Q- FOR MARCH 31 AND JUNE 30, 2005 FILE NO. 0-50140

REITLER BROWN & 800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor ROSENBLATT LLC New York, NY 10022-7604 ------------------- Tel (212) 209-3050 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Fax (212) 371-5500

December 1, 2005

Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, North East Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are special counsel for ACL Semiconductors, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY").

We are in receipt of the letter, dated October 24, 2005 (the "COMMENT LETTER"), from Brian R. Cascio, Accounting Branch Chief of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "COMMISSION"), addressed to the Company. Set forth below are the responses of the Company to the comments set forth in the Comment Letter, numbered to correspond thereto. All capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined, herein shall have the respective definitions assigned thereto in the filing transmitted herewith.

COMMENT NUMBER RESPONSE -------------- --------

1. The Company takes notice of the Commission's comments and the Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

2. The Company takes notice of the Commission's comments and the Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

3. The Company purchased from the affiliates listed on pages 32 -35 of the Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2004 memory products such as chips, flash memory cards, integrated circuits, Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM). The sales of the Company's inventories were to these affiliates which were then sold to such affiliates' customers. The inventories were not resold to the Company. The Company also purchased certain inventories from these affiliates to meet its customers' demand if the Company could not obtain sufficient inventory supplies from Samsung Hong Kong. However, the Company did not sell to and repurchase from the affiliates the identical inventories. In addition, none of the Company's purchases from these affiliates represent any returns of the previous sales to these affiliates.

4. During the calendar year of 2004, Samsung Hong Kong was actively seeking to expand its market share of its memory products in the region. Samsung Hong Kong

<PAGE>

COMMENT NUMBER RESPONSE -------------- --------

implemented a policy to reduce the prices of its memory products which translated into a lower profit margin for companies selling Samsung's memory products, such as the Company. The lower prices for the memory products have continued for much of the calendar year of 2005. The Company has adopted this "aggressive pricing strategy" in order to maximize its sales. The Company's strategy is dependent upon market competition and demand for the memory products. The Company will revise its disclosure in its future filings to include this response.

5. The Company previously had a line of credit with DahSing bank in the amount of approximately $987,179 (HK$7,700,000). In June 2004, the Company was in negotiation with DahSing bank for modification of certain terms and the amount of the line of credit. As a result of this negotiation, in August 2004, the Company loaned $611,446 to City Royal to pay off the mortgage loan on a residential property owned by City Royal and pledged to DahSing Bank as collateral to secure the Company's borrowings from DahSing Bank. The line of credit amount was also increased to a total of approximately $2,308,000 (HK$18,000,000). In February 2005, City Royal sold the residential property and has repaid the loan of $611,446 through transferring the entire proceeds from the sale of approximately $1,025,641 (HK$8,000,000) to DahSing Bank as collateral for the Company's line. The excess of the amount transferred to DahSing Bank over the outstanding loan receivable of $414,195 was classified as payable to City Royal. The Company repaid $86,276 in the second quarter of 2005 with an outstanding balance of $327,919 as of September 30, 2005. The loan from City Royal was short-term in nature and the Company expects the loan to be repaid by January 2006. The Company did not impute any interest on the loan. The imputed interest amount was immaterial to the consolidated financial statements of the Company based on the relatively low prevailing borrowing rate in Hong Kong. The loan with DahSing Bank had not been repaid as of the date of this letter. The Company will revise its disclosure in its future fillings to include this response.

6. The Company is highly dependent on the memory products from Samsung Hong Kong with sales of memory products supplied by Samsung Hong Kong accounting for approximately 80% of the Company's revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004. If the Company is unable to receive sufficient quantities of memory products from Samsung Hong Kong, the Company may not be able to continue its business. The Company is in the process of taking steps to reduce its dependence on Samsung Hong Kong such as its contemplated acquisition of Classic Electronics Ltd. ("CLASSIC"), a reseller of memory products. Additionally, the Company is currently seeking other companies which sell memory products for possible acquisition or strategic partnership. The Company will revise its disclosure in its future filings to include this response.

7. During the course of the audit for the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company's auditors found certain errors and certain undisclosed related party transactions. These errors include (a) approximately $320,000 of amount paid to a related party was incorrectly expensed; such amount was an advance to the related party, was expected to be repaid by this related party and, therefore, should be classified as an asset; (b) approximately $2.5 million of sales to related party was inadvertently included in the regular sales; (c) approximately $55,000 of prepaid insurance was incorrectly expensed as such amount should be capitalized and expensed over the benefit period.

<PAGE>

COMMENT NUMBER RESPONSE -------------- --------

Since the Company's auditors' findings, the Company has taken the following steps to prevent these errors from happening: (a) the Company added one more level of technical review by hiring an outside consultant who is a CPA to oversee all the accounting records after the controller has completed the period end closing prior to submitting the financial statements to our CFO for final review; and (b) the sales reports are reviewed by the Company's CFO and COO to ensure all the related parties and related party transactions are being captured.

The Company's auditors have not found any material adjustments during their quarterly reviews for the first, second and third quarters of 2005.

8. (1) The majority of the Company's revenues are earned in Hong Kong and South East China region;

(2) The majority of the Company's assets are located in Hong Kong;

(3) The Company's management and accounting records are located in Hong Kong; and

(4) The majority of the audit work was performed in Hong Kong by the Company's U.S. auditors (out of its office in Irvine, California).

9. The Company takes notice of the Commission's comments and the Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

10. The fair value of the shares issued to the consultants as merger costs was computed based on the most recent quoted market price of $1.05 (on September 29, 2003) prior to the effective date of the merger on September 30, 2003.

The Company will disclose the aforementioned information in its future filings.

11. The Company takes notice of the Commission's comments and the Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

12. The $2.7 million merger costs represent the fair value of the 2,620,000 shares of the Company's common stock issued to certain financial advisors. These shares were valued at $1.05 per share based on the most recent quoted market price prior to the effective date of the merger.

The services provided by these advisors include identifying the acquiree (Atlantic Components Ltd.) and the efforts negotiating the terms of the merger.

Prior to the acquisition, none of these advisors had any relationship with either the acquirer or the acquiree and had no direct interest in either the Company or Atlantic Components Ltd.

13. The Company paid the $1 million acquisition deposit through a reduction of the accounts receivable due from Classic. The deposit was non-cash in nature and was disclosed in the Statements of Cash Flows on Page F-6 of our Form 10K for 2004.

Per the agreement between the Company and Classic, the deposit is fully refundable. Based on the verbal agreement between the management of the two entities, the Company and Classic expect the acquisition to be consummated prior to December 31, 2005.

<PAGE>

COMMENT NUMBER RESPONSE -------------- --------

14. Discounts and price adjustments represent cash rebates and discounts given to certain customers based on the verbal agreements with these customers. Amounts for such rebates and discounts were classified as a reduction of revenues, in accordance with EITF 01-19, "Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor's Products)."

15. The Company takes notice of the Commission's comments and the Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

16. The Company takes notice of the Commission's comments and the Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

17. A majority of the related party transactions are consummated with Classic, an entity the Company expects to acquire later this year. Classic is in the business of selling/reselling memory products. Unlike the business of the Company, Classic sells memory products of all brands. Certain customers of Classic often place orders of memory products of different brands including Samsung memory products. Classic will then purchase the products from the Company in order to fill the customers' orders. The Company has been selling its products to Classic at prices equal or comparable to those sold to other non-related customers.

The Company, from time to time, may purchase products from Classic. This situation occurs when there is a shortage of products from Samsung Hong Kong. The Company may engage Classic to search for Samsung products from other Samsung distributors located throughout Asia in order to fill its customer orders.

Additionally, the Company has other transactions with other affiliates during the normal course of business. All of these affiliates are in the business of electronic products which need memory products for their assembling lines. The Company has been selling its products at the same price levels as those sold to other non-related customers.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2004, the Company evaluated the implication of FIN 46R and the impact of applying FIN 46R to its consolidated financial statements and has produced the following analysis and conclusion.

Under FIN 46R, an entity shall be subject to consolidation if by design any of the following 3 conditions exists:

1. The amount of equity investment at risk is not sufficient to allow it to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. Subordinated financial support refers to variable interests that will absorb some or all of an entity's expected losses, if they occur.

2. The holders of the equity investment at risk as a group lack any one or more of the following characteristics of a controlling financial interest:

a. The ability, directly or indirectly, to make decisions about the investee's activities;

b. The obligation to absorb the investee's expected losses if they occur;

c. The right to receive expected residual returns if they occur.

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>

REITLER
BROWN &                                             800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor
ROSENBLATT LLC                                           New York, NY 10022-7604
-------------------                                           Tel (212) 209-3050
ATTORNEYS AT LAW                                              Fax (212) 371-5500

                                                  December 1, 2005

Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, North East
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:  ACL SEMICONDUCTORS, INC.
     FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
     FORMS 10Q- FOR MARCH 31 AND JUNE 30, 2005
     FILE NO. 0-50140

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We are  special  counsel  for  ACL  Semiconductors,  Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation (the "COMPANY").

         We are in receipt of the letter,  dated  October 24, 2005 (the "COMMENT
LETTER"),  from Brian R. Cascio,  Accounting  Branch Chief of the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  (the  "COMMISSION"),  addressed to the Company.  Set forth
below are the  responses of the Company to the comments set forth in the Comment
Letter,  numbered to correspond  thereto.  All  capitalized  terms used, but not
otherwise defined, herein shall have the respective definitions assigned thereto
in the filing transmitted herewith.

COMMENT NUMBER   RESPONSE
--------------   --------

1.               The Company takes notice of the  Commission's  comments and the
                 Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

2.               The Company takes notice of the  Commission's  comments and the
                 Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

3.               The Company  purchased from the  affiliates  listed on pages 32
                 -35 of the Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2004 memory
                 products  such  as  chips,   flash  memory  cards,   integrated
                 circuits, Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM). The sales of the
                 Company's  inventories were to these affiliates which were then
                 sold to such  affiliates'  customers.  The inventories were not
                 resold to the  Company.  The  Company  also  purchased  certain
                 inventories from these affiliates to meet its customers' demand
                 if the Company could not obtain sufficient  inventory  supplies
                 from  Samsung Hong Kong.  However,  the Company did not sell to
                 and repurchase  from the affiliates the identical  inventories.
                 In  addition,  none  of  the  Company's  purchases  from  these
                 affiliates represent any returns of the previous sales to these
                 affiliates.

4.               During  the  calendar  year of  2004,  Samsung  Hong  Kong  was
                 actively  seeking  to expand  its  market  share of its  memory
                 products in the region.  Samsung Hong Kong

<PAGE>

COMMENT NUMBER   RESPONSE
--------------   --------

                 implemented  a  policy  to  reduce  the  prices  of its  memory
                 products  which  translated  into a  lower  profit  margin  for
                 companies  selling  Samsung's  memory  products,  such  as  the
                 Company.   The  lower  prices  for  the  memory  products  have
                 continued  for much of the calendar  year of 2005.  The Company
                 has adopted  this  "aggressive  pricing  strategy"  in order to
                 maximize its sales.  The Company's  strategy is dependent  upon
                 market  competition  and demand for the  memory  products.  The
                 Company  will revise its  disclosure  in its future  filings to
                 include this response.

5.               The Company  previously  had a line of credit with DahSing bank
                 in the amount of approximately $987,179 (HK$7,700,000). In June
                 2004,  the Company was in  negotiation  with  DahSing  bank for
                 modification  of  certain  terms and the  amount of the line of
                 credit.  As a result of this  negotiation,  in August 2004, the
                 Company  loaned  $611,446 to City Royal to pay off the mortgage
                 loan on a residential  property owned by City Royal and pledged
                 to  DahSing  Bank  as   collateral   to  secure  the  Company's
                 borrowings  from DahSing  Bank.  The line of credit  amount was
                 also   increased  to  a  total  of   approximately   $2,308,000
                 (HK$18,000,000).   In  February  2005,   City  Royal  sold  the
                 residential  property  and has  repaid  the  loan  of  $611,446
                 through  transferring  the  entire  proceeds  from  the sale of
                 approximately  $1,025,641  (HK$8,000,000)  to  DahSing  Bank as
                 collateral  for the  Company's  line.  The excess of the amount
                 transferred   to  DahSing  Bank  over  the   outstanding   loan
                 receivable of $414,195 was classified as payable to City Royal.
                 The Company  repaid  $86,276 in the second quarter of 2005 with
                 an  outstanding  balance of $327,919 as of September  30, 2005.
                 The loan  from  City  Royal was  short-term  in nature  and the
                 Company  expects  the loan to be repaid by  January  2006.  The
                 Company did not impute any  interest  on the loan.  The imputed
                 interest  amount was immaterial to the  consolidated  financial
                 statements  of  the  Company  based  on  the   relatively   low
                 prevailing  borrowing  rate in Hong Kong. The loan with DahSing
                 Bank had not been  repaid  as of the date of this  letter.  The
                 Company will revise its  disclosure  in its future  fillings to
                 include this response.

6.               The Company is highly  dependent  on the memory  products  from
                 Samsung  Hong Kong with sales of memory  products  supplied  by
                 Samsung  Hong  Kong  accounting  for  approximately  80% of the
                 Company's revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004. If the
                 Company is unable to receive  sufficient  quantities  of memory
                 products from Samsung Hong Kong, the Company may not be able to
                 continue its business.  The Company is in the process of taking
                 steps to reduce its dependence on Samsung Hong Kong such as its
                 contemplated    acquisition   of   Classic   Electronics   Ltd.
                 ("CLASSIC"), a reseller of memory products.  Additionally,  the
                 Company is currently  seeking other companies which sell memory
                 products for possible acquisition or strategic partnership. The
                 Company  will revise its  disclosure  in its future  filings to
                 include this response.

7.               During the course of the audit for the year ended  December 31,
                 2004,  the Company's  auditors found certain errors and certain
                 undisclosed  related party  transactions.  These errors include
                 (a)  approximately  $320,000 of amount paid to a related  party
                 was  incorrectly  expensed;  such  amount was an advance to the
                 related party,  was expected to be repaid by this related party
                 and,   therefore,   should  be  classified  as  an  asset;  (b)
                 approximately  $2.5  million  of sales  to  related  party  was
                 inadvertently  included in the regular sales; (c) approximately
                 $55,000 of prepaid  insurance was incorrectly  expensed as such
                 amount  should be  capitalized  and  expensed  over the benefit
                 period.

                                       2
<PAGE>

COMMENT NUMBER   RESPONSE
--------------   --------

                 Since the Company's auditors'  findings,  the Company has taken
                 the following steps to prevent these errors from happening: (a)
                 the Company added one more level of technical  review by hiring
                 an  outside  consultant  who  is  a  CPA  to  oversee  all  the
                 accounting  records  after the  controller  has  completed  the
                 period end closing prior to submitting the financial statements
                 to our CFO for  final  review;  and (b) the sales  reports  are
                 reviewed by the Company's CFO and COO to ensure all the related
                 parties and related party transactions are being captured.

                 The Company's auditors have not found any material  adjustments
                 during their quarterly reviews for the first,  second and third
                 quarters of 2005.

8.               (1) The majority of the  Company's  revenues are earned in Hong
                 Kong and South East China region;

                 (2) The  majority of the  Company's  assets are located in Hong
                 Kong;

                 (3) The Company's management and accounting records are located
                 in Hong Kong; and

                 (4) The  majority of the audit work was  performed in Hong Kong
                 by the  Company's  U.S.  auditors (out of its office in Irvine,
                 California).

9.               The Company takes notice of the  Commission's  comments and the
                 Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

10.              The fair  value of the  shares  issued  to the  consultants  as
                 merger  costs  was  computed  based on the most  recent  quoted
                 market  price of $1.05 (on  September  29,  2003)  prior to the
                 effective date of the merger on September 30, 2003.

                 The Company will disclose the aforementioned information in its
                 future filings.

11.              The Company takes notice of the  Commission's  comments and the
                 Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

12.              The $2.7 million  merger costs  represent the fair value of the
                 2,620,000  shares  of the  Company's  common  stock  issued  to
                 certain financial  advisors.  These shares were valued at $1.05
                 per share based on the most recent quoted market price prior to
                 the effective date of the merger.

                 The services provided by these advisors include identifying the
                 acquiree (Atlantic Components Ltd.) and the efforts negotiating
                 the terms of the merger.

                 Prior  to the  acquisition,  none  of  these  advisors  had any
                 relationship  with either the  acquirer or the acquiree and had
                 no direct interest in either the Company or Atlantic Components
                 Ltd.

13.              The Company paid the $1 million  acquisition  deposit through a
                 reduction  of the accounts  receivable  due from  Classic.  The
                 deposit  was  non-cash  in  nature  and  was  disclosed  in the
                 Statements of Cash Flows on Page F-6 of our Form 10K for 2004.

                 Per the agreement between the Company and Classic,  the deposit
                 is fully refundable.  Based on the verbal agreement between the
                 management of the two entities,  the Company and Classic expect
                 the acquisition to be consummated prior to December 31, 2005.

                                       3
<PAGE>

COMMENT NUMBER   RESPONSE
--------------   --------

14.              Discounts  and price  adjustments  represent  cash  rebates and
                 discounts  given  to  certain  customers  based  on the  verbal
                 agreements with these  customers.  Amounts for such rebates and
                 discounts  were  classified  as a  reduction  of  revenues,  in
                 accordance with EITF 01-19, "Accounting for Consideration Given
                 by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor's
                 Products)."

15.              The Company takes notice of the  Commission's  comments and the
                 Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

16.              The Company takes notice of the  Commission's  comments and the
                 Company will revise accordingly in its future filings.

17.              A majority of the related party  transactions  are  consummated
                 with  Classic,  an entity the Company  expects to acquire later
                 this year.  Classic  is in the  business  of  selling/reselling
                 memory  products.  Unlike the business of the Company,  Classic
                 sells  memory  products of all  brands.  Certain  customers  of
                 Classic  often place  orders of memory  products  of  different
                 brands  including  Samsung memory  products.  Classic will then
                 purchase  the  products  from the  Company in order to fill the
                 customers' orders. The Company has been selling its products to
                 Classic at prices  equal or  comparable  to those sold to other
                 non-related customers.

                 The  Company,  from time to time,  may purchase  products  from
                 Classic.  This  situation  occurs  when there is a shortage  of
                 products from Samsung Hong Kong. The Company may engage Classic
                 to search for Samsung products from other Samsung  distributors
                 located throughout Asia in order to fill its customer orders.

                 Additionally,  the  Company has other  transactions  with other
                 affiliates  during the normal course of business.  All of these
                 affiliates  are in the business of  electronic  products  which
                 need memory products for their  assembling  lines.  The Company
                 has been selling its products at the same price levels as those
                 sold to other non-related customers.

                 During the quarter ended March 31, 2004, the Company  evaluated
                 the  implication  of FIN 46R and the impact of applying FIN 46R
                 to its consolidated  financial  statements and has produced the
                 following analysis and conclusion.

                 Under FIN 46R, an entity shall be subject to  consolidation  if
                 by design any of the following 3 conditions exists:

                 1. The amount of equity investment at risk is not sufficient to
                 allow  it  to  finance  its   activities   without   additional
                 subordinated financial support from other parties. Subordinated
                 financial support refers to variable interests that will absorb
                 some or all of an entity's expected losses, if they occur.

                 2. The holders of the equity investment at risk as a group lack
                 any  one  or  more  of  the  following   characteristics  of  a
                 controlling financial interest:

                      a. The ability,  directly or indirectly, to make decisions
                      about the investee's activities;

                      b. The obligation to absorb the investee's expected losses
                      if they occur;

                      c. The right to receive expected  residual returns if they
                      occur.