SEC Comment Letter for AIM ImmunoTech Inc. (AIM) (CIK 0000946644) (AIM) — Mar 18, 2011
AIM ImmunoTech Inc. (AIM) (CIK 0000946644)
Date: March 18, 2011 · CIK: 0000946644 · Accession: 0000000000-11-016956
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
December 29, 2010 William A. Carter, M.D. Chief Executive Officer Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. 1617 JFK Boulevard Philadelphia, PA 19103 Re: Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 File No. 1-13441 Dear Mr. Carter: We have reviewed your December 23, 2010 re sponse to our December 3, 2010 letter and have the following comments. Please respond to this letter within te n business days by providing the requested information or by advising us when you will provide this information. Please furnish us a letter on EDGAR under the form type label CORRESP th at keys your response to our comments. After reviewing the information provided, we may raise additional comments. Appendix A to your December 23, 2010 response Critical Accounting Policies 1. We note you identify warrant liability as a critical policy in your proposed revised disclosure to be included in an amendment to your December 31, 2010 Form 10-K. The intent of identifying critical policies is to id entify those that require material assumptions and estimates which if different assumptions and estimates were made would materially affect the financial statements. Please revi se your proposed disclo sure to explain how this policy requires significant estimates and quantify the effect on the financial statements of changes in estimates in each year presented and the reasons for those changes. Please also disclose why you select ed the volatility measure that you selected. If the volatility assumption is based on an average method, please disclose why you chose not to rely exclusively on your historical volatility. Please also disclose the peer group of companies used to determine the av erage volatility assumption, the weight given to companies in the peer group in compu ting the average vola tility assumption and whether the companies in the peer group of co mpanies are similar to you in terms of size, product and market capitalization. William A. Carter, M.D. Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. December 29, 2010 Page 2 (17) Fair Value 2. Please revise your disclosure regarding the wa rrant liability classi fied as level 3 to include a descripti on of the inputs and valuation technique(s) used to measure fair value and a discussion of changes in valuation tech niques and related inputs, if any, during the period as well as a reconciliation of the be ginning and ending balances, separately presenting changes during the peri od. Refer to ASC 820-10-50. 3. Please provide us supplementally with the inpu ts used in the Black Scholes model at each valuation date (March 2010, June 2009/ 2010, September 2009/2010), to determine the fair value of the warrant liability, similar to that provided for the period ended December 31, 2009. In your response, explain why any assu mptions remained consistent from those used at December 31, 2009 (i.e. volatility), if true, and th e accounting literature that supports your accounting treatment. You may contact Sasha Parikh, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551-3627 or Gus Rodriguez, Accounting Branch Chief, at (202) 551-3752 if you have questions regarding the processing of your response as well as any questio ns regarding the comment. In this regard, do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 551-3679. Sincerely, Jim B. Rosenberg Senior Assistant Chief Accountant