SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for ACHIEVE LIFE SCIENCES, INC. (ACHV) (CIK 0000949858) (ACHV) — Jun 1, 2017

ACHIEVE LIFE SCIENCES, INC. (ACHV) (CIK 0000949858)
Date: June 1, 2017 · CIK: 0000949858 · Accession: 0000000000-17-019213

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-216961

Date
May 24, 2017
Author
/s/ Erin K. Jaskot, for
Form
UPLOAD
Company
ACHIEVE LIFE SCIENCES, INC. (ACHV) (CIK 0000949858)

Letter

Mail Stop 4546 June 1, 201 7 Scott Cormack President and Chief Executive Officer OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 19820 North Creek Parkway Bothell, Washington 98011

Re: OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S -4 Filed May 24, 2017 File No. 333-216961

Dear Mr. Cormack :

We have reviewed your amended registration statement and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the requested information . If you do not believe our comments apply t o your facts and circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments. Unless we note otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our May 17, 2017 letter .

Compe tition, page 180

Prescription Treatments, page 181

1. We note your response to our prior comment 5. Please revise to disclos e that “no apparent difference in efficacy between cytisine and Chantix ” means that the review found that the risk ratio for cytisine and Chantix was found to be in the same order of magnitude . Please also clearly disclose that only two studies were used to calculate the risk ratio for cytisine versus 27 trials for varenicline , and that evidence for varenicline

Scott Cormack OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. June 1, 201 7 Page 2

was considered of high and moderate quality while the evidence for cytisine was considered low quality.

2. We note your response to our prior comment 6. Please revise the disclosure of the Cochrane Group review to provide the year of the first trial included in the review.

You may contact Rolf Sundwall at (202) 551 -3105 or Mark Brunhofer at (202) 551 -3494 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please contact Ada D. Sarmento at (202) 551 -3798 or Erin Jaskot, Special Counsel, at (202) 551 - 3442 with any other questions .

Sincerely,
/s/ Erin K. Jaskot, for

Show Raw Text
Mail Stop 4546
June 1, 201 7

Scott Cormack
President and Chief Executive Officer
OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.
19820 North Creek Parkway
Bothell, Washington  98011

Re: OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.
Amendment No. 2  to
Registration Statement on Form S -4
Filed  May  24, 2017
  File No. 333-216961

Dear Mr. Cormack :

We have reviewed your amended registration statement  and have the following
comments.  In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we
may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the
requested information .  If you do not believe our comments apply t o your facts and
circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your
response.

After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you
provide in response to these  comments, we may have  additional comments.   Unless we note
otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our  May 17, 2017  letter .

Compe tition, page 180

Prescription Treatments, page 181

1. We note your response to our prior comment 5.  Please revise to disclos e that “no
apparent difference in efficacy between cytisine and Chantix ” means that the review
found that the risk ratio for cytisine and Chantix was found to be in the same order of
magnitude .  Please also clearly disclose  that only two studies were used to calculate the
risk ratio for cytisine versus 27 trials for varenicline , and that evidence for varenicline

Scott Cormack
OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.
June 1, 201 7
Page 2

 was considered of high and moderate quality while the evidence for cytisine was
considered low quality.

2. We note your response to our prior comment  6.  Please revise the disclosure of the
Cochrane Group review to provide the year of the first trial included in the review.

You may contact Rolf Sundwall  at (202) 551 -3105  or Mark Brunhofer  at (202) 551 -3494
if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters.
Please contact Ada D. Sarmento  at (202) 551 -3798 or Erin Jaskot, Special Counsel,  at (202) 551 -
3442 with any other questions .

Sincerely,

 /s/ Erin K. Jaskot, for

Suzanne Hayes
Assistant Director
Office of Healthcare and Insurance

cc:  Robert Free dman
 Fenwick & West  LLP