SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from NOVAVAX INC (NVAX) (CIK 0001000694) (NVAX) — Nov 15, 2005

NOVAVAX INC (NVAX) (CIK 0001000694)
Date: Nov. 15, 2005 · CIK: 0001000694 · Accession: 0000950133-05-005212

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 000-26770

Referenced dates: July 12, 2005, July 26, 2005

Date
November 15, 2005
Author
Not clearly detected
Form
CORRESP
Company
NOVAVAX INC (NVAX) (CIK 0001000694)

Letter

Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Novavax, Inc. Form 10-K/A for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 Filed March 15, 2005 File No. 000-26770

Dear Messrs. Rosenberg and Parker and Ms. Hartz:

On behalf of Novavax, Inc. (the “Company”), following my telephone conversation with Ms. Hartz, I am writing to modify our response to the third comment in your letter dated July 12, 2005 with respect to the above referenced filing (the “Filing”). This letter supplements and expands our response letters dated July 26, 2005 and October 31, 2005.

Concurrence with Comment 3

Per our telephone conversation at the end of August of this year, you requested in future filings that Novavax segregate its sales returns allowance provisions related to sales for the current period from the provisions relating to sales from prior periods. The Company concurs with that request and will initiate the requested level of detail and disclosure in future filings, beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. It was also our understanding following our telephone conversation that if the Company’s rebates continue to be an insignificant amount as a percentage of sales or net income, the Company is permitted to simply note the amount and/or percentage and not provide the roll-forward detail as required for sales returns. The Company therefore will continue this practice in future filings.

Mr. Jim Rosenberg, Mr. Joel Parker and Ms. Dana Hartz

Securities and Exchange Commission

November 15, 2005

Page 2

The Company acknowledges that (a) the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the Filing; (b) staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking action with respect to the Filing; and (c) the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Please do not hesitate to call me at (484) 913-1203 if you have any additional comments or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Dennis W. Genge

Chief Financial Officer

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

corresp

November 15, 2005

Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail

Jim B. Rosenberg, Senior Assistant Chief Accountant

Joel Parker, Accounting Branch Chief

Dana Hartz, Staff Accountant

Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

    Re:

    Novavax, Inc.

    Form 10-K/A for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004

    Filed March 15, 2005

    File No. 000-26770

Dear Messrs. Rosenberg and Parker and Ms. Hartz:

     On behalf of Novavax, Inc. (the “Company”), following my telephone conversation with Ms.
Hartz, I am writing to modify our response to the third comment in your letter dated July 12, 2005
with respect to the above referenced filing (the “Filing”). This letter supplements and expands
our response letters dated July 26, 2005 and October 31, 2005.

Concurrence with Comment 3

     Per our telephone conversation at the end of August of this year, you requested in future
filings that Novavax segregate its sales returns allowance provisions related to sales for the
current period from the provisions relating to sales from prior periods. The Company concurs with
that request and will initiate the requested level of detail and disclosure in future filings,
beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. It was
also our understanding following our telephone conversation that if the Company’s rebates continue
to be an insignificant amount as a percentage of sales or net income, the Company is permitted to
simply note the amount and/or percentage and not provide the roll-forward detail as required for
sales returns. The Company therefore will continue this practice in future filings.

Mr. Jim Rosenberg, Mr. Joel Parker and Ms. Dana Hartz

Securities and Exchange Commission

November 15, 2005

Page 2

     The Company acknowledges that (a) the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of
the disclosure in the Filing; (b) staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff
comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking action with respect to the Filing; and (c) the
Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or
any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

     Please do not hesitate to call me at (484) 913-1203 if you have any additional comments or
questions.

    Yours sincerely,

Dennis W. Genge

Chief Financial Officer