SEC Comment Letter for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) (CIK 0001002047) (NTAP) — Jun 4, 2009
NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) (CIK 0001002047)
Date: June 4, 2009 · CIK: 0001002047 · Accession: 0000000000-09-029827
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-0303
DIVISION OF
CORPORATION FINANCE
Mail Stop 3628 June 4, 2009
Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail
Daniel J. Warmenhoven Chief Executive Officer NetApp, Inc. 495 East Java Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94089
RE: NetApp, Inc. Schedules TO-I and TO-I/A
Filed May 22, 2009 and June 1, 2009 File No. 5-48933
Dear Mr. Warmenhoven:
We have limited our review of the above listed filings to those issues we have addressed
in our comments below. Where indicated, we think you should revise the document in response to these comments. If you disagree, we will consider your explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable or a revision is unnecessary. Please be as detailed as necessary in your explanation. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure. After reviewing this information, we may raise additional comments. All defined terms used in this letter have the same meaning as in the filings listed above, unless otherwise indicated.
The purpose of our review process is to assist you in the compliance with the applicable
disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in the filing. We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome any questions you may have about our comments or any other aspect of our review. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this letter.
Daniel J. Warmenhoven
NetApp, Inc. June 4, 2009 Page 2
Schedule TO-I
Exhibit (a)(1)(A): Offer to Exchange
General
1. In your response letter, tell us how you distributed the Offer to Exchange to your
employees. Since the primary means of tendering is electronic, were the offer materials distributed only via e-mail? If so, explain why you believe this method of dissemination
is appropriate under the circumstances of this Offer to Exchange, taking into consideration the characteristics of the subject security holders and your normal means of communicating with your employees. In describing the means of dissemination, explain how the link to the means of tender was provided in relation to the Offer to Exchange. That is, was there a means to ensure that eligible employees accessed the offer materials before being able to access the link to tender?
2. Supplementally confirm that you have filed on EDGAR all of the information that
appears on the website, and that you will continue to file all updated information if the website is changed.
3. We note your disclosure throughout the document providing that you are not making the
exchange offer in any jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted. Please note that the all-holders provision in Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(f)(8) applies equally to U.S. holders as well as non-U.S. holders. Refer to the interpretive guidance in section II.G.1. of SEC Release 33-8957. If you are relying on the global exemptive order applicable to employee stock option exchanges to exclude from participation in the Offer to Exchange some employees located outside the United States, please be advised that exemptive relief is premised on the compensatory reasons for the exclusion of such employees. Accordingly, please explain the reasons for any exclusions of participants residing outside of the U.S. or advise as to how the company is complying with the all-holders provision in Rule 13e-4(f)(8).
Conditions of the offer, page 47
4. Please refer to the last paragraph of this section relating to your failure to exercise any of
the rights described in this section. Note that when a condition is triggered and you decide to proceed with the offer anyway, we believe that this constitutes a waiver of the triggered condition(s). Depending on the materiality of the waived condition and the number of days remaining in the offer, you may be required to extend the offer and re-circulate new disclosure to security holders. You may not, as this language seems to imply, simply fail to assert a triggered offer condition and thus effectively waive it without officially doing so. Please confir m your understanding in your response letter.
5. Please see our comment above. When an offer condition is triggered by events that occur
during the offer period and before the expiration of the offer, the company should inform
Daniel J. Warmenhoven
NetApp, Inc. June 4, 2009 Page 3
holders of Eligible Options how it intends to proceed promptly, rather than wait until the end of the offer period, unless the condition is one where satisfaction of the condition may be determined only upon expiration. Please confirm the company’s understanding in your response letter.
Extension of offer; termination; amendment, page 60
6. In the second paragraph of this section, you reserve the right to terminate or amend the
exchange offer upon the occurrence of any of the events listed as offer conditions “by giving oral or written notice” to option holders. We do not believe that orally informing holders of such a development, without more, satisfies your obligations under the tender offer rules. Please confirm that you will provide appropriate notice through the filing and dissemination of revised offer materials. See Rule 13e-4(c)(3) and (e)(3).
* * *
As appropriate, please amend your filing in response to these comments. You may wish
to provide us with marked copies of the amended filing to expedite our review. Please furnish a cover letter with your amended filing that keys your responses to our comments and provides any requested supplemental information. Detailed cover letters greatly facilitate our review. Please understand that we may have additional comments after reviewing your amended filing and responses to our comments.
In connection with responding to our comments, please provide, in writing, a statement
from the company acknowledging that:
• the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the
filings;
• staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and
• the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated
by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
In addition, please be advised that the Division of Enforcement has access to all
information you provide to the staff of the Divi sion of Corporation Finance in our review of
your filings or in response to our comments on your filings.
Daniel J. Warmenhoven
NetApp, Inc. June 4, 2009 Page 4
Please direct any questions to me at (202) 551-3621 or, in my absence, to Christina Chalk,
Senior Special Counsel, at (202) 551-3263. You ma y also contact me via facsimile at (202) 772-
9203. Please send all correspondence to us at the following ZIP code: 20549-3628.
S i n c e r e l y ,
Song Brandon Special Counsel Office of Mergers & Acquisitions cc: Via Facsimile (650-493-6811)
Steven E. Bochner, Esq. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati