SEC Company Response from Capstone Green Energy Holdings, Inc. (CGEH) (CIK 0001009759) (CEPL) — Oct 11, 2013
Capstone Green Energy Holdings, Inc. (CGEH) (CIK 0001009759)
Date: Oct. 11, 2013 · CIK: 0001009759 · Accession: 0001104659-13-075392
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Reasoning
File numbers found in text: 001-15957
Referenced dates: September 27, 2013
Letter
VIA EDGAR Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Re: Capstone Turbine Corporation Form 10-K Filed June 13, 2013 File No. 001-15957
Dear Ms. Ravitz:
Below is the response of Capstone Turbine Corporation (the “Company”) to the comment issued by the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) in a letter to the Company dated September 27, 2013 regarding the above-referenced Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 (the “Form 10-K”). The Staff’s comment is repeated and underlined below for convenience of reference.
Comment:
Item 11. Executive Compensation
1. We see from your disclosure in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 35 of your proxy statement that you have incorporated by reference into your annual report on Form 10-K that the value of the fiscal 2013 stock and option awards to your named executive officers increased significantly, in some cases doubling, from the value of the same awards made in fiscal 2012. Please tell us, and expand your compensation discussion and analysis in future filings to disclose, as appropriate, how you determined the size of the stock and option awards granted to each named executive officer, how and why those stock and option awards varied among the named executive officers and how and why the compensation committee determined to increase or decrease the value of those awards as compared to the prior year. Refer to Regulation S-K Item 402(b)(1)(v) and (b)(2)(ix). For additional guidance, please see “Staff Observations in the Review of Executive Compensation Disclosure” available at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/execcompdisclosure.htm.
Response:
As we will be describing in detail below, the value of the awards in fiscal year 2013 were at historical levels. For fiscal year 2012, equity incentives were temporarily reduced by approximately half of the amounts awarded in fiscal year 2011 and in earlier years. This was a result of the depletion of shares available under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”) in 2012 and is illustrated in the schedule of awards to named executive officers for fiscal years 2011 through 2014 attached hereto as Schedule 1.
The Compensation Committee sets the amount of stock incentive awards for each named executive officer on the basis of equity incentive awards made to comparable officers by peer companies. It also evaluates the level of equity incentives that have been previously awarded to each named executive officer. Distinctions between executive officers are based on comparison data and the Compensation Committee’s assessment of each individual. The Compensation Committee relies on comparative market data provided by its independent compensation consultant, Aon Hewitt (“Hewitt”). Such data includes comprehensive analyses of total compensation and compensation components based on published survey data sized to the Company’s total revenue and includes publicly-traded technology and manufacturing industry companies that are between $50 million and $200 million in revenue. This information includes share utilization and annual grant rates. The Compensation Committee also evaluates the total cost of its stock-based compensation programs, and the effect of such cost on the Company’s performance, based on information provided annually by, and in consultation with, Hewitt.
For fiscal year 2012, the shares available for awards under the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan were substantially depleted. There were not enough shares to make awards that would have been in the normal range and as had been recommended by Hewitt under its normal analysis for fiscal year 2012. Therefore, in consultation with Hewitt, the Compensation Committee approved a reduction of approximately 48% of the proposed aggregate award. Proportionate reductions were made to the amounts that would have been awarded to each named executive officer. Stockholders approved adding 9,000,000 shares of stock for awards under the Equity Incentive Plan in fiscal year 2013. The subsequent awards for fiscal year 2013 and fiscal year 2014 reflect the availability of shares for awards that are more closely aligned with the Company’s historical practices. Such awards were based on Hewitt’s analysis, and management was being rewarded for substantial progress towards internal goals. As requested by the Staff, the Company will expand its disclosure in future filings to include the requested items as appropriate.
In connection with this response, the Company acknowledges that: (i) the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission; (ii) Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the Company’s filings; and (iii) the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
If you or the Staff have any questions or comments regarding the Company’s response, please contact the undersigned at (818) 734-5300 or the Company’s legal counsel, J. Chase Cole at (615) 850-8476.
Very truly yours,
Capstone Turbine Corporation
Show Raw Text
CORRESP 1 filename1.htm October 11, 2013 VIA EDGAR Amanda Ravitz Assistant Director Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Capstone Turbine Corporation Form 10-K Filed June 13, 2013 File No. 001-15957 Dear Ms. Ravitz: Below is the response of Capstone Turbine Corporation (the “Company”) to the comment issued by the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) in a letter to the Company dated September 27, 2013 regarding the above-referenced Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 (the “Form 10-K”). The Staff’s comment is repeated and underlined below for convenience of reference. Comment: Item 11. Executive Compensation 1. We see from your disclosure in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 35 of your proxy statement that you have incorporated by reference into your annual report on Form 10-K that the value of the fiscal 2013 stock and option awards to your named executive officers increased significantly, in some cases doubling, from the value of the same awards made in fiscal 2012. Please tell us, and expand your compensation discussion and analysis in future filings to disclose, as appropriate, how you determined the size of the stock and option awards granted to each named executive officer, how and why those stock and option awards varied among the named executive officers and how and why the compensation committee determined to increase or decrease the value of those awards as compared to the prior year. Refer to Regulation S-K Item 402(b)(1)(v) and (b)(2)(ix). For additional guidance, please see “Staff Observations in the Review of Executive Compensation Disclosure” available at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/execcompdisclosure.htm. Response: As we will be describing in detail below, the value of the awards in fiscal year 2013 were at historical levels. For fiscal year 2012, equity incentives were temporarily reduced by approximately half of the amounts awarded in fiscal year 2011 and in earlier years. This was a result of the depletion of shares available under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”) in 2012 and is illustrated in the schedule of awards to named executive officers for fiscal years 2011 through 2014 attached hereto as Schedule 1. The Compensation Committee sets the amount of stock incentive awards for each named executive officer on the basis of equity incentive awards made to comparable officers by peer companies. It also evaluates the level of equity incentives that have been previously awarded to each named executive officer. Distinctions between executive officers are based on comparison data and the Compensation Committee’s assessment of each individual. The Compensation Committee relies on comparative market data provided by its independent compensation consultant, Aon Hewitt (“Hewitt”). Such data includes comprehensive analyses of total compensation and compensation components based on published survey data sized to the Company’s total revenue and includes publicly-traded technology and manufacturing industry companies that are between $50 million and $200 million in revenue. This information includes share utilization and annual grant rates. The Compensation Committee also evaluates the total cost of its stock-based compensation programs, and the effect of such cost on the Company’s performance, based on information provided annually by, and in consultation with, Hewitt. For fiscal year 2012, the shares available for awards under the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan were substantially depleted. There were not enough shares to make awards that would have been in the normal range and as had been recommended by Hewitt under its normal analysis for fiscal year 2012. Therefore, in consultation with Hewitt, the Compensation Committee approved a reduction of approximately 48% of the proposed aggregate award. Proportionate reductions were made to the amounts that would have been awarded to each named executive officer. Stockholders approved adding 9,000,000 shares of stock for awards under the Equity Incentive Plan in fiscal year 2013. The subsequent awards for fiscal year 2013 and fiscal year 2014 reflect the availability of shares for awards that are more closely aligned with the Company’s historical practices. Such awards were based on Hewitt’s analysis, and management was being rewarded for substantial progress towards internal goals. As requested by the Staff, the Company will expand its disclosure in future filings to include the requested items as appropriate. In connection with this response, the Company acknowledges that: (i) the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission; (ii) Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the Company’s filings; and (iii) the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. If you or the Staff have any questions or comments regarding the Company’s response, please contact the undersigned at (818) 734-5300 or the Company’s legal counsel, J. Chase Cole at (615) 850-8476. Very truly yours, Capstone Turbine Corporation By: /s/ Edward I. Reich Edward I. Reich Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer cc: J. Chase Cole 2 Schedule 1 Awards to Named Executive Officers for Fiscal Years 2011 through 2014 Officer Fiscal Year Grant Date Awards Reported Value Darren R. Jamison 2014 4/9/2013 589,200 options N/A 166,670 RSUs N/A 2013 6/6/2012 583,330 options $ 391,939 145,830 RSUs $ 147,288 2012 6/8/2011 150,000 options $ 170,085 45,000 RSUs $ 73,800 2011 6/9/2010 360,000 options $ 282,600 60,000 RSUs $ 63,000 Edward I. Reich 2014 4/9/2013 235,700 options N/A 66,670 RSUs N/A 2013 6/6/2012 250,000 options $ 167,975 62,500 RSUs $ 63,125 2012 6/8/2011 75,000 options $ 85,043 15,000 RSUs $ 24,600 2011 6/9/2010 150,000 options $ 117,750 20,000 RSUs $ 21,000 Jayme L. Brooks 2014 4/9/2013 78,600 options N/A 22,220 RSUs N/A 2013 6/6/2012 83,330 options $ 55,989 20,830 RSUs $ 21,038 2012 6/13/2011 43,300 options $ 50,947 0 RSUs $ 0 2011 6/9/2010 86,600 options $ 67,981 0 RSUs $ 0 James D. Crouse 2014 4/9/2013 235,700 options N/A 66,670 RSUs N/A 2013 6/6/2012 250,000 options $ 167,975 62,500 RSUs $ 63,125 2012 6/8/2011 75,000 options $ 85,043 15,000 RSUs $ 24,600 2011 6/9/2010 75,000 options $ 58,875 18,000 RSUs $ 18,900 Mark G. Gilbreth(1) 2014 N/A — — — — 2013 6/6/2012 250,000 options $ 167,975 62,500 RSUs $ 63,125 2012 6/8/2011 75,000 options $ 85,043 15,000 RSUs $ 24,600 2011 6/9/2010 135,000 options $ 105,975 22,000 RSUs $ 23,100 (1) Mr. Gilbreth resigned from the Company effective March 29, 2013 and accordingly was not granted any plan-based awards for fiscal year 2014. 3