SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from Outdoor Holding (POWW) — Aug 8, 2017

Outdoor Holding Co
Date: Aug. 8, 2017 · CIK: 0001015383 · Accession: 0001079973-17-000459

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 001-13101

Date
August 3, 2017
Author
/s/ Fred Wagenhals
Form
CORRESP
Company
Outdoor Holding Co

Letter

Office of Beverages, Apparel, and Mining Division of Corporate Finance Securities and Exchange Commission August 1, 2017 Comment Letter Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 File No. 001-13101

Dear Mr. Arakawa:

We have read your letter and our answer to the inquiry is as follows:

Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017

Note 3–Vendor Notes Receivable, page 12

1.

We note you have recorded $1.77 million of goodwill as a result of your successful credit bid for the collateral related to the note receivable you held with ATAC. Please tell us your basis for recording goodwill related to this transaction, citing the authoritative literature that supports your accounting.

Answer:

On February 20, 2017, AMMO as a result of a successful credit bid foreclosed on the assets of ATAC. At February 20, 2017 the fair value of the assets acquired was:

Assets

$

117,517

Collectible receivables

509,447

Inventory

187,815

Equipment

814,779

Notes payable owned by AMMO

2,585,000

Recognized goodwill

$

1,770,221

The fair value of each asset was assessed by management and a valuation expert was employed to ascertain the fair value of the manufacturing equipment. The ATAC inventory was originally valued at $1,129,000 in ATAC’s general ledger; however, the ATAC packaging and certain manufactured ATAC products bearing the ATAC brand could not be used by AMMO. Basically, the only inventory that could be used was the raw materials, which were priced at replacement cost which management felt was its fair value. There were no intangible assets, such as customer lists, trade secrets, or brand names due to the bad reputation of the ATAC brand.

In FASB ASC 805-30-30-1, goodwill should be recognized at the acquisition date (in this case the foreclosure date), measured as the excess of (a) over (b) as follows:

a.

The aggregate of the (1) consideration transferred, (2) fair value of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and (3) acquisition-date fair value of any previously held equity interest in the acquiree, if the business combination was achieved in stages.

b.

Net amount of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date.

It is AMMO’s management’s opinion that the goodwill recognized was determined in accordance with FASB ASC 805-30-30-1.

Very truly yours,
/s/ Fred Wagenhals

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Correspondence

August 3, 2017

Mr. Craig Arakawa

Accounting Branch Chief

Office of Beverages, Apparel, and Mining

Division of Corporate Finance

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, DC 20549

Mail Stop 3561

RE:

August 1, 2017

Comment Letter

Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017

File No. 001-13101

Dear Mr. Arakawa:

We have read your letter and our answer to the inquiry is as follows:

Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017

Note 3–Vendor Notes Receivable, page 12

1.

We note you have recorded $1.77 million of goodwill as a result of your successful credit bid for the collateral related to the note receivable you held with ATAC.  Please tell us your basis for recording goodwill related to this transaction, citing the authoritative literature that supports your accounting.

Answer:

On February 20, 2017, AMMO as a result of a successful credit bid foreclosed on the assets of ATAC. At February 20, 2017 the fair value of the assets acquired was:

Assets

$

117,517

Collectible receivables

509,447

Inventory

187,815

Equipment

814,779

Notes payable owned by AMMO

2,585,000

Recognized goodwill

$

1,770,221

The fair value of each asset was assessed by management and a valuation expert was employed to ascertain the fair value of the manufacturing equipment.  The ATAC inventory was originally valued at $1,129,000 in ATAC’s general ledger; however, the ATAC packaging and certain manufactured ATAC products bearing the ATAC brand could not be used by AMMO.  Basically, the only inventory that could be used was the raw materials, which were priced at replacement cost which management felt was its fair value.  There were no intangible assets, such as customer lists, trade secrets, or brand names due to the bad reputation of the ATAC brand.

In FASB ASC 805-30-30-1, goodwill should be recognized at the acquisition date (in this case the foreclosure date), measured as the excess of (a) over (b) as follows:

a.

The aggregate of the (1) consideration transferred, (2) fair value of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and (3) acquisition-date fair value of any previously held equity interest in the acquiree, if the business combination was achieved in stages.

b.

Net amount of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date.

It is AMMO’s management’s opinion that the goodwill recognized was determined in accordance with FASB ASC 805-30-30-1.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Fred Wagenhals

Fred Wagenhals