SEC Company Response from EAGLE BROADBAND INC (CIK 0001023139) — Dec 2, 2005
EAGLE BROADBAND INC (CIK 0001023139)
Date: Dec. 2, 2005 · CIK: 0001023139 · Accession: 0001157523-05-010578
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-127895
Referenced dates: November 8, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Eagle Broadband, Inc. Correspondence
101
Courageous Drive
League
City, Texas 77573
Phone:
(281) 538-6000
Toll
Free: (800) 628-3910
Fax:
(281) 538-4730
www.eaglebroadband.com
December
2, 2005
U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Via Federal
Express
Division
of Corporation Finance
100
F Street, NE
Mail
Stop 3561
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
Eagle
Broadband, Inc. (the “Company” or “Eagle”)
Amendment
No. 2 to Form S-1, filed October 28, 2005
File
No.: 333-127895
Dear
Mr.
Spirgel:
Please
be
advised that, concurrent with this response, the Company filed Amendment No.
3
to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Amendment”). A courtesy copy of
the filing is enclosed herewith, together with a redline comparison to Amendment
No. 2 filed October 28, 2005. The following are our responses to your comment
letter dated November 8, 2005. Our responses are numbered to correspond with
the
numbered paragraphs included in your comment letter.
Please
note that the Amendment has been updated to include our audited financial
statements as of August 31, 2005, an updated Management’s Discussion and
Analysis section, and other information updated as of August 31, 2005. In the
enclosed redlined document, the financial statements and MD&A section are
not presented with marked changes, as these sections were replaced in their
entirety with the information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
November 29, 2005.
Amendment
No. 2 to Form S-1, General
1.
The
Company has filed (or incorporated by reference) all previously omitted
exhibits, including a current auditor’s consent from Lopez, Blevins, Bork
and Associates, LLP (Exhibit 23.1). We did not list a consent
from McManus & Co. in
Amendment No. 2 because we realized that, due to our financial statements
being more than 134 days old, updated financial statements would
be
necessary in a subsequent amendment. Since these updated financial
statements do not include fiscal year 2002, a consent from McManus
&
Co. is no longer necessary.
Prospectus
Summary, page 1
2.
The
warrant agreement with Keystone was executed on November 16, 2005.
Although the warrant form was not complete at the time of the original
S-1
filing, the terms of the warrant had been agreed upon by the parties,
and
Eagle was legally obligated to issue the warrant in accordance with
those
terms at the time of the original S-1
filing.
Mr.
Larry Spirgel
Page
2
December
2, 2005
Part
II - Information not Required in the Prospectus, page II-1
Item
15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities, page II-2
3.
The
August 2005 disclosure has been revised to include the name of the
individual to whom the 1,157,895 shares were issued and the consideration
therefor. In the August 16, 2005 order issued by the 56th Judicial
District Court of Galveston County, Texas, the court specifically
addressed the fairness of the stock issuance in approving the settlement
after being advised that the Company would rely on the Section 3(a)(10)
exemption based on the court’s fairness
opinion.
The
October 2003 disclosure has been revised to include information regarding the
individual to whom the 4,756,249 shares were issued and the consideration
therefor.
Item
16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules, page II-3
4.
Exhibit
3.1, Restated Articles of Incorporation, was filed with the Amendment,
replacing Exhibits 3.1(a) through
3.1(f).
If
you
have any questions regarding the foregoing, please call me at (281)
538-6014.
Very
truly yours,
/s/
Jeff Adams
Jeff Adams
Corporate
Counsel