SEC Company Response from AUTOLIV INC (ALV, ALIV) (CIK 0001034670) (ALV) — Jan 25, 2008
AUTOLIV INC (ALV, ALIV) (CIK 0001034670)
Date: Jan. 25, 2008 · CIK: 0001034670 · Accession: 0001157523-08-000556
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-12933
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
a5593339.htm
January
25,
2008
VIA
EDGAR
and FEDEX
United
States Securities and Exchange
Commission
Division
of Corporation
Finance
100
F Street,
N.E.
Washington,
D.C.
20549-3628
Attention: Hanna
Teshome
Re:
Autoliv,
Inc.
File
Number:
001-12933
Form
10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006
Dear
Ms.
Teshome:
On
behalf of Autoliv, Inc.
(the “Company”),
I
am respectfully responding to the comments
received on January 15,
2008from
the staff of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
“Staff”)
regarding the Company’s
definitive proxy statement
filed on March 8,
2007.
For
ease of
review, I have set forth below each of the numbered comments of the Staff’s
letter and the Company’s responses thereto.
Compensation
Discussion & Analysis
1.
Please
provide an expanded analysis
of the elements
and levels of compensation paid to the named executive officers.
Throughout your Compensation Discussion and Analysis, and as to each
compensation element, you should provide an analysis of how you arrived
at
and why you paid
each particular level and
form of compensation for 2006. Your Compensation Discussion and Analysis
should provide investors with an understanding of the specific factors
considered by the committee in ultimately approving particular pieces
of
each named
executive officer’s
compensation package and it
should describe the reasons why the committee believes that the amounts
paid to each named executive officer are appropriate in light of
the
various items it considered in making specific compensation
decisions.
Item 402(b)(2) of
Regulation S-K sets forth examples of material information that
could be appropriate
for discussion
in
compensation
discussion and analysis. Please give
appropriate
consideration to how these topics are applicable to your executive
compensation
program
and revise your disclosure
accordingly.
Response: The
Company
respectfully submits that in future filings the Company will expand the analysis
of the elements and levels of compensation paid to the named executive officers,
will provide an analysis of how
the
Company arrived at and paid each
particular
level and form of compensation,
will describe the specific
factors considered by the
committee in ultimately approving particular pieces of each named executive
officer’s
compensation package,
and will describe
the reasons why the committee
believes that the amounts paid to each named executive officer are appropriate
in light of the various items it considered in making specific compensation
decisions. In addition, the
Company respectfully
submits that in future filings the Company will give appropriate consideration to how
the
topics in Item 402(b)(2) of
Regulation S-K are
applicable to the
Company’s
executive compensation program and will
revise its
disclosure accordingly.
2.
Your
disclosure indicates
that you rely on
certain benchmark companies for guidance in setting your
compensation. Please
revise your
disclosure in future filings to identify the companies to which you
benchmark your compensation. If you have benchmarked
different elements
of
your compensation against different benchmarking groups, please identify
the companies that comprise each group. Refer to Item
402(b)(2)(xiv) of Regulation S-K. Furthermore, please discuss
where you target each element of compensation against
the peer companies and where
actual payments fall within targeted parameters. To the extent
actual compensation was outside a targeted percentile range, please
explain why.
Response: The
Company
respectfully submits that in future filings the Company will identify the
companies in the Company’s designated peer group and will discuss where the
Company targets each relevant element of compensation against the peer companies
and where actual payments fall within targeted parameters. To the
extent actual compensation was outside a targeted percentile range, the Company
will explain why.
*
* *
The
Company acknowledges that
it is responsible for
the
adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; that Staff
comments or changes to disclosure
in response to Staff
comments
do not foreclose the Commission
from taking any action with respect to the filing; and that it
may not assert Staff comments as a
defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
federal securities laws of the United States.
*
* *
Please
do not hesitate to contact me by
telephone at 011
46 8 587
20
608, by fax
at 011
46 8 587
20 633,
or by email lars.sjobring@autoliv.com with
any questions or comments regarding
this correspondence.
Very
truly yours,
Lars
Sjöbring
Vice
President Legal
Affairs,
General
Counsel and
Secretary
cc:
Lars
Westerberg, Chairman,
Autoliv,
Inc.
James
M. Ringler, Chairman of the
Compensation Committee, Autoliv,
Inc.
Jan
Carlson, President
and CEO, Autoliv,
Inc.