SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from REV HOLDINGS LLC (CIK 0001035678) — Nov 2, 2005

REV HOLDINGS LLC (CIK 0001035678)
Date: Nov. 2, 2005 · CIK: 0001035678 · Accession: 0000950136-05-006888

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 333-23451

Referenced dates: October 26, 2005

Date
November 2, 2005
Author
/s/ Todd J. Slotkin
Form
CORRESP
Company
REV HOLDINGS LLC (CIK 0001035678)

Letter

November 2, 2005 Mr. John Cash Accounting Branch Chief Division of Corporation Finance Securities and Exchange Commission Mail Stop 7010 Washington, DC 20549-7010

Re: REV Holdings LLC (the "Company") Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-K") Filed March 31, 2005 File No. 333-23451

Dear Mr. Cash:

Set forth below is the Company's response to the comment raised by the staff (the "Staff") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") in your letter dated October 26, 2005 (the "Comment Letter"). For the convenience of the Staff, the comment in the Comment Letter is reprinted in bold and italics and is followed by the corresponding response of the Company.

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2004

Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies – Principals of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation, Page F-7

1. We read that you have consolidated Revlon, Inc. in your financial statements based upon your approximately 51% ownership of the voting power of Revlon, Inc.'s common stock. We also note that you own approximately 14% of the total shares of Revlon, Inc.'s common stock. Please tell us, and revise your consolidation policy in future filings to clarify, why you have not reflected the minority owners' interests in Revlon, Inc. within your financial statements. We assume this is due to the deficit position of the minority interest.

Mr. John Cash Page 2

We confirm your assumption that we have not reflected the minority owners' interest in our subsidiary (Revlon, Inc.) in our consolidated financial statements because of the subsidiary's stockholders' deficiency. Our accounting treatment is based upon the guidance in ARB 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements". Paragraph 15 of ARB 51 states, in part, that when the losses applicable to the minority interest in a subsidiary exceed the minority interest in the equity capital of the subsidiary, such excess and any further losses applicable to the minority interest should be charged against the majority interest, as there is no obligation of the minority interest to make good such losses. In future filings, we will revise our consolidation policy to clarify this accounting treatment.

The Company hereby acknowledges that:

(a) the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure it its filing;

(b) Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the Company's filing; and

(c) the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

* * * *

Mr. John Cash Page 3

If you have any questions regarding the response to the comment of the Staff, or require additional information, please contact the undersigned at (212) 572-8600.

Very truly
yours,
/s/ Todd J. Slotkin

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

REV
Holdings LLC
 35 East 62 Street
 New York, New York
10021

November 2, 2005

Mr. John
Cash
 Accounting Branch Chief
Division of Corporation
Finance
Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 7010

Washington, DC 20549-7010

Re:
REV
Holdings LLC (the "Company")
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form
10-K")
Filed March 31, 2005
File No. 333-23451

Dear Mr. Cash:

Set forth below is the Company's
response to the comment raised by the staff (the
"Staff") of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") in your letter
dated October 26, 2005 (the "Comment
Letter"). For the convenience of the Staff, the comment in
the Comment Letter is reprinted in bold and italics and is followed by
the corresponding response of the Company.

FORM 10-K FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

Financial
Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2004

Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies –
Principals of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation, Page
F-7

1.
We read that you
have consolidated Revlon, Inc. in your financial statements based upon
your approximately 51% ownership of the voting power of Revlon,
Inc.'s common stock. We also note that you own approximately
14% of the total shares of Revlon, Inc.'s common stock.
Please tell us, and revise your consolidation policy in future filings
to clarify, why you have not reflected the minority owners'
interests in Revlon, Inc. within your financial statements. We assume
this is due to the deficit position of the minority
interest.

Mr. John Cash
 Page 2

We
confirm your assumption that we have not reflected the minority
owners' interest in our subsidiary (Revlon, Inc.) in our
consolidated financial statements because of the subsidiary's
stockholders' deficiency. Our accounting treatment is based upon
the guidance in ARB 51, "Consolidated Financial
Statements". Paragraph 15 of ARB 51 states, in part, that
when the losses applicable to the minority interest in a subsidiary
exceed the minority interest in the equity capital of the subsidiary,
such excess and any further losses applicable to the minority interest
should be charged against the majority interest, as there is no
obligation of the minority interest to make good such losses.  In
future filings, we will revise our consolidation policy to clarify this
accounting treatment.

The Company hereby acknowledges that:

(a) the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure it its filing;

(b) Staff comments or changes to
disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the
Commission from taking any action with respect to the Company's
filing; and

(c) the Company may not assert Staff comments as a
defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person
under the federal securities laws of the United States.

*    *    *    *

Mr. John Cash
 Page 3

If
you have any questions regarding the response to the comment of the
Staff, or require additional information, please contact the
undersigned at (212) 572-8600.

Very truly
yours,

/s/ Todd J. Slotkin

Todd J.
Slotkin