SEC Company Response from INDUS REALTY TRUST, INC. (CIK 0001037390) — Dec 12, 2005
INDUS REALTY TRUST, INC. (CIK 0001037390)
Date: Dec. 12, 2005 · CIK: 0001037390 · Accession: 0001037390-05-000055
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: November 30, 2005, October 20, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Response to SEC letter of November 30, 2005
Griffin
Land & Nurseries, Inc.
90
Salmon Brook Street
Granby,
Ct 06035
(860)
653-4541
(860)
653-2919 (fax)
December
12, 2005
VIA
EDGAR
Nilimah
N. Shah
Accounting
Branch Chief
Division
of Corporation Finance
Securities
and Exchange Commission
100
F
Street, N.E., Mail Stop 7010
Washington,
D.C. 20549-7010
RE:
Griffin
Land & Nurseries, Inc.
Form
10-K/A for the Fiscal Year Ended November 27, 2004
Form
10-Q/A for the Fiscal Quarter Ended February 26, 2005
Forms
10-Q for the Fiscal Quarters Ended May 28, 2005 and August 27,
2005
Filed
November 3, 2005
File
No. 1-12879
Dear
Ms.
Shah:
This
letter sets forth the response of Griffin Land & Nurseries, Inc. (the
“Company”) to the comments of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) to the above-referenced filings received
by letter dated November 30, 2005. For your convenience, we have set forth
the
Staff’s comments immediately preceding our response.
Staff
Comments:
1.
Form
10-K/A for the Fiscal Year Ended November 27,
2004
We
refer
you to our letter dated October 20, 2005 regarding the disclosure and
presentation of your restatements for the fiscal years 2004, 2003, 2002,
2001,
and 2000. As discussed in this letter, Selected Financial Data for fiscal
2001
and 2000 should be marked as unaudited in your Form 10-K/A for the fiscal
year
ended November 27, 2004. Although fiscal years 2001 and 2000 were labeled
restated, they were not also labeled unaudited. Please tell us where you
have
included this disclosure or why you believe it is not necessary. Otherwise,
please amend your Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended November 27, 2004
to
label fiscal years 2001 and 2000 as they appear in the Selected Financial
Data
section as unaudited.
Response:
The
Company believes that the disclosure in the introductory paragraph to the
Selected Financial Data table, which states that only the selected financial
data for fiscal years 2002, 2003 and 2004 are derived from the audited financial
statements included elsewhere in the report, is sufficient to inform readers
that the selected financial data for fiscal years 2000 and 2001 are unaudited.
Additionally, the Company believes it would be misleading to label fiscal
years
2000 and 2001 as they appear in the Selected Financial Data section as unaudited
because it would suggest that fiscal years 2002, 2003 and 2004 were subject
to a
review by the Company’s independent auditors under SAS No. 42, “Reporting on
Condensed Financial Statements and Selected Financial Data.” The Company
believes the approach it used in the Form 10-K/A for the year ended November
27,
2004 is consistent with the practice of the Division of Corporation Finance
with
respect to labeling columns in the Selected Financial Data section of periodic
reports, as reflected in Securities and Exchange Commission Division of
Corporation Finance Accounting Disclosure Rules and Practices Manual, 2000
Edition, Topic 4, which states in relevant part:
F.
Selected Financial Data
1.
An
auditor may be engaged to report on selected financial data using the guidance
of SAS 42. Identification of some or all columns of selected financial data
as
"audited" or other references to the auditor can create the impression that
the
registrant has so engaged the auditor. If no auditor association with the
selected financial data has occurred but an investor could obtain such an
impression from the manner of presentation, the staff should recommend revision
of that presentation. A statement in a headnote to the data that the amounts
presented for the fiscal year are derived from audited financial statements
does
not create the impression that the information was subject to a SAS 42
examination.
2.
If an
auditor was engaged to report on the selected financial data, the form of
report
specified by SAS 42 should be included in the filing and the auditor's consent
to the report should make reference to its applicability to the selected
financial data.
2.
Form
10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter Ended August 27,
2005
We
reviewed your Item 4 disclosure included in your Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended August 27, 2005. Your disclosure states that except as described
above, there were no changes in your internal control over financial reporting
during your most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, your internal control over financial
reporting. In future filings, please avoid using phrases that include “except
for” wording, which appears contradictory when disclosing changes which occurred
in your internal controls during the most recent fiscal quarter.
Response:
The
Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will incorporate such comment in
preparing future filings.
Pursuant
to your request, the Company acknowledges that: (i) it is responsible for
the
adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings; (ii) Staff comments
or
changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the
Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and (iii)
the
Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated
by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the
United
States.
If
you
have any questions or comments with respect to these responses or other matters,
please call the undersigned at (860) 653-4541, ext. 125.
Very
truly yours,
/s/
Anthony J. Galici
Anthony
J. Galici
Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer
and
Secretary