SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from ACS - TECH 80 LTD (CIK 0001038144) — Sep 22, 2005

ACS - TECH 80 LTD (CIK 0001038144)
Date: Sept. 22, 2005 · CIK: 0001038144 · Accession: 0001178913-05-001355

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: August 5, 2005

Date
September 22, 2005
Author
Not clearly detected
Form
CORRESP
Company
ACS - TECH 80 LTD (CIK 0001038144)

Letter

VIA EDGAR AND COURIER September 22, 2005 Gary R. Todd Reviewing Accountant Mail Stop 6010 Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 U.S.A Reference: Your letter dated August 5, 2005

RE: ACS-TECH80 LTD. FORM 20-F FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 FORMS 6-K FOR 2005 FILE NO. 1-14662

Dear Mr. Todd:

Set forth herein are the responses of ACS-Tech80 Ltd. (the "Company") to the comments contained in the comment letter of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Staff"), dated August 5, 2005, with respect to the Company's Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 20-F") filed with the Commission on June 21, 2005.

For your convenience, we have reprinted the Staff's written comments below prior to the Company's responses. The numbering corresponds to the comment numbers in the Staff's above referenced letter.

Courtesy copies have been sent to the Staff's examiners via courier.

<PAGE>

[ACS-Tech80 LOGO]

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS, PAGE 22

OPERATING RESULTS, PAGE 26

1. WE SEE THE 56% INCREASE IN REVENUES IN 2004. IN FUTURE FILINGS PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILED AND SPECIFIC DISCUSSION OF REASONS FOR THE SIGNIFICANT INCREASE. FOR INSTANCE, PLEASE MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBE HOW THE IMPROVED BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IMPACTED REVENUES. ALSO PROVIDE SOME DESCRIPTION OF NEW PRODUCTS INTRODUCED AND THEIR IMPACT ON REVENUES.

In future filings we will provide more detailed specific discussion of significant changes in revenues. We will also provide description of new products introduced and their impact on revenues.

2. WE READ IN NOTE 15 THAT YOU HAVE SEVERAL OPERATING SEGMENTS. TO THE EXTENT IMPORTANT TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR OPERATING RESULTS, PLEASE EXPAND FUTURE FILINGS TO DISCUSS AND TO COMPARE THE REVENUES GENERATED BY EACH SEGMENT, AND THE OPERATING INCOME PRODUCED EACH SEGMENT.

In future filings we will provide information regarding the revenues and operating income generated by each segment.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2-K REVENUE RECOGNITION, PAGE F-12

3. WE SEE THAT THE REVENUE POLICIES MAKE DISCLOSURE ABOUT THE GENERIC CRITERIA FROM SAB 104 FOR REVENUE RECOGNITION. PLEASE EXPAND FUTURE FILINGS TO CLARIFY HOW YOU APPLY THOSE CRITERIA IN YOUR SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES. FOR INSTANCE, DISCLOSE WHAT YOU CONSIDER TO BE "PERVASIVE EVIDENCE OF AN AGREEMENT" AND MAKE DISCLOSURE ABOUT THE FACTORS YOU CONSIDER IN CONCLUDING THAT "COLLECTIBILITY IS PROBABLE." ALSO CLARIFY SHIPPING TERMS AND IDENTIFY WHEN YOU CONSIDER DELIVERY TO HAVE OCCURRED. YOUR RESPONSE SHOULD SHOW US HOW YOU INTEND TO APPLY THIS COMMENT.

<PAGE>

[ACS-Tech80 LOGO]

In future filings, we will clarify how we apply the criteria from SAB 104 for revenue recognition. We intend to include the following disclosure in our "revenue recognition" note:

"Revenues from product sales are recognized, net of discounts, in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 "REVENUE RECOGNITION" when (i) delivery has occurred in accordance with the agreed upon terms (usually ex-factory or FOB shipping point), (ii) there is persuasive evidence of an agreement in the form of a signed detailed purchase order, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, (iv) collection of the related receivable is probable based on past experience in respect of existing customers. With regard to new customers, the Company either requires advance payment, or performs credit checks prior to extending any credit (v) no further obligations exist on our part. We do not grant a right of return. The Group markets its products through its direct sales force and through distributors that are considered as final customers."

4. WE SEE THAT YOU CONSIDER WHETHER "SIGNIFICANT OBLIGATIONS" EXIST IN ASSESSING THE TIMING OF REVENUE. PLEASE EXPAND FUTURE FILINGS TO MAKE DISCLOSURE ABOUT THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF POST SHIPMENT OBLIGATIONS AND CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE PROTOCOLS, INCLUDING MORE SPECIFIC DETAIL ABOUT HOW THERE MATTERS ARE CONSIDERED IN THE TIMING OF REVENUES. YOUR RESPONSE SHOULD SHOW US HOW YOU INTEND TO APPLY THIS COMMENT.

As suggested in our response to Comment 3 above, note 2-K will be revised to state "no further obligation" instead of "significant obligation" as we do not have any post delivery obligation to our customers except for customary warranty provisions.

The terms of sales to our customers do not include any obligation to install our products at the customer's place of business, nor to provide assistance in installation. No uncertainties exist regarding customer acceptance as our customer purchase orders do not contain an acceptance provision that applies after delivery has occurred. .

<PAGE>

[ACS-Tech80 LOGO]

5. TELL US MORE ABOUT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALES TO DISTRIBUTORS. SHOW US THAT YOU REVENUE PRACTICES FOR TRANSACTIONS WITH THESE ENTITIES ARE APPROPRIATE.

We do not grant our distributors a right of return, either formal or informal. As such, the distributors are considered to be final customers. We have an established experience of no returns from our existing distributors. For the fiscal years ending December 31, 2003 and 2004, there were no returns by distributors, except for insignificant amounts (which were made solely upon our discretion). We have a long-term relationship with a limited number of distributors, and the amount of sales to new distributors is immaterial.

NOTE 2-T IMPAIRMENT OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, PAGE F-14

6. YOUR ACCOUNTING POLICY FOR IMPAIRMENT OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT DOES NOT APPEAR TO CONFORM TO US GAAP. IN FUTURE FILINGS PLEASE EXPAND NOTE 16 TO PROVIDE DISCLOSURE ABOUT THIS POTENTIAL ISRAELI/US GAAP DIFFERENCE.

In future filings we will expand Note 16 to provide disclosure on the potential ISRAELI/US GAAP DIFFERENCES regarding impairment of property and equipment.

NOTE 10 (C) SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, PAGE F-24

7. WE SEE THAT CERTAIN OPTIONS WERE CANCELED AND RE-GRANTED IN DECEMBER 2003. FOR US GAAP PURPOSES, TELL US HOW YOUR ACCOUNTING CONSIDERS THE GUIDANCE FROM FIN 44.

In 2003, the tax authorities in Israel revised Section 102 to the Israeli Tax Code with regard to the taxation of stock options granted to employees. The revised section is only applicable to options granted subsequent to the revision of this section. In order to comply with the revised section, the company, as many other Israeli companies at that time, decided to cancel the old options and to immediately grant new options under the same terms (I.E., the same contractual life period, the same exercise price, the same number of shares, etc.) According to Fin 44, interpretation 31 "....A MODIFICATION TO A FIXED STOCK OPTION OR AWARD THAT DOES NOT AFFECT THE LIFE OF THE AWARD, THE EXERCISE PRICE, OR THE NUMBER OF SHARES TO BE ISSUED HAS NO ACCOUNTING CONSEQUENCE." As there was no change in the terms of the options, the action of the cancellation and the re-grant has no accounting consequence under FIN 44.

<PAGE>

[ACS-Tech80 LOGO]

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM, PAGE T-1

8. IN FUTURE FILINGS PLEASE REVISE THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE AUDIT REPORT TO REFER TO THE PCAOB BY ITS FULL NAME. THAT IS, THE PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD (UNITED STATES).

In future filings we will ask the applicable auditors to revise their audit report and to refer to the PCAOB by its full name.

9. IN FUTURE FILING PLEASE DISCLOSE THE CITY AND STATE WHERE THE REPORT WAS SIGNED. REFER TO RULE 2-02 OF REGULATION S-X.

In future filings we will ask the applicable auditors to revise their audit report and to disclose the city and state where the report was signed.

* * * *

<PAGE>

[ACS-Tech80 LOGO]

The Company hereby acknowledges that:

o The company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in this filing;

o Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to filing; and

o The company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

If you have any questions or concerns, please call the undersigned at 972-4-6546440.

Very truly yours,
ACS-Tech80 Ltd.

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>

                               [ACS-Tech80 LOGO]

                              VIA EDGAR AND COURIER
                                                              September 22, 2005

Gary R. Todd
Reviewing Accountant
Mail Stop 6010
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
U.S.A

           RE:    ACS-TECH80 LTD.
                  FORM 20-F FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
                  FORMS 6-K FOR 2005
                  FILE NO. 1-14662

                  Reference: Your letter dated August 5, 2005

Dear Mr. Todd:

Set forth herein are the responses of ACS-Tech80 Ltd. (the "Company") to the
comments contained in the comment letter of the staff of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Staff"), dated August 5, 2005, with respect to the
Company's Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form
20-F") filed with the Commission on June 21, 2005.

For your convenience, we have reprinted the Staff's written comments below prior
to the Company's responses. The numbering corresponds to the comment numbers in
the Staff's above referenced letter.

Courtesy copies have been sent to the Staff's examiners via courier.

<PAGE>

                               [ACS-Tech80 LOGO]

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS, PAGE 22

OPERATING RESULTS, PAGE 26

     1.   WE SEE THE 56% INCREASE IN REVENUES IN 2004. IN FUTURE FILINGS PLEASE
          PROVIDE MORE DETAILED AND SPECIFIC DISCUSSION OF REASONS FOR THE
          SIGNIFICANT INCREASE. FOR INSTANCE, PLEASE MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBE
          HOW THE IMPROVED BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IMPACTED REVENUES. ALSO PROVIDE
          SOME DESCRIPTION OF NEW PRODUCTS INTRODUCED AND THEIR IMPACT ON
          REVENUES.

     In future filings we will provide more detailed specific discussion of
     significant changes in revenues. We will also provide description of new
     products introduced and their impact on revenues.

     2.   WE READ IN NOTE 15 THAT YOU HAVE SEVERAL OPERATING SEGMENTS. TO THE
          EXTENT IMPORTANT TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR OPERATING RESULTS, PLEASE
          EXPAND FUTURE FILINGS TO DISCUSS AND TO COMPARE THE REVENUES GENERATED
          BY EACH SEGMENT, AND THE OPERATING INCOME PRODUCED EACH SEGMENT.

     In future filings we will provide information regarding the revenues and
     operating income generated by each segment.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2-K REVENUE RECOGNITION, PAGE F-12

     3.   WE SEE THAT THE REVENUE POLICIES MAKE DISCLOSURE ABOUT THE GENERIC
          CRITERIA FROM SAB 104 FOR REVENUE RECOGNITION. PLEASE EXPAND FUTURE
          FILINGS TO CLARIFY HOW YOU APPLY THOSE CRITERIA IN YOUR SPECIFIC
          CIRCUMSTANCES. FOR INSTANCE, DISCLOSE WHAT YOU CONSIDER TO BE
          "PERVASIVE EVIDENCE OF AN AGREEMENT" AND MAKE DISCLOSURE ABOUT THE
          FACTORS YOU CONSIDER IN CONCLUDING THAT "COLLECTIBILITY IS PROBABLE."
          ALSO CLARIFY SHIPPING TERMS AND IDENTIFY WHEN YOU CONSIDER DELIVERY TO
          HAVE OCCURRED. YOUR RESPONSE SHOULD SHOW US HOW YOU INTEND TO APPLY
          THIS COMMENT.

<PAGE>

                               [ACS-Tech80 LOGO]

     In future filings, we will clarify how we apply the criteria from SAB 104
     for revenue recognition. We intend to include the following disclosure in
     our "revenue recognition" note:

     "Revenues from product sales are recognized, net of discounts, in
     accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 "REVENUE RECOGNITION"
     when (i) delivery has occurred in accordance with the agreed upon terms
     (usually ex-factory or FOB shipping point), (ii) there is persuasive
     evidence of an agreement in the form of a signed detailed purchase order,
     (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, (iv) collection of the related
     receivable is probable based on past experience in respect of existing
     customers. With regard to new customers, the Company either requires
     advance payment, or performs credit checks prior to extending any credit
     (v) no further obligations exist on our part. We do not grant a right of
     return. The Group markets its products through its direct sales force and
     through distributors that are considered as final customers."

     4.   WE SEE THAT YOU CONSIDER WHETHER "SIGNIFICANT OBLIGATIONS" EXIST IN
          ASSESSING THE TIMING OF REVENUE. PLEASE EXPAND FUTURE FILINGS TO MAKE
          DISCLOSURE ABOUT THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF POST SHIPMENT OBLIGATIONS
          AND CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE PROTOCOLS, INCLUDING MORE SPECIFIC DETAIL
          ABOUT HOW THERE MATTERS ARE CONSIDERED IN THE TIMING OF REVENUES. YOUR
          RESPONSE SHOULD SHOW US HOW YOU INTEND TO APPLY THIS COMMENT.

     As suggested in our response to Comment 3 above, note 2-K will be revised
     to state "no further obligation" instead of "significant obligation" as we
     do not have any post delivery obligation to our customers except for
     customary warranty provisions.

     The terms of sales to our customers do not include any obligation to
     install our products at the customer's place of business, nor to provide
     assistance in installation. No uncertainties exist regarding customer
     acceptance as our customer purchase orders do not contain an acceptance
     provision that applies after delivery has occurred. .

<PAGE>

                               [ACS-Tech80 LOGO]

     5.   TELL US MORE ABOUT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALES TO DISTRIBUTORS.
          SHOW US THAT YOU REVENUE PRACTICES FOR TRANSACTIONS WITH THESE
          ENTITIES ARE APPROPRIATE.

     We do not grant our distributors a right of return, either formal or
     informal. As such, the distributors are considered to be final customers.
     We have an established experience of no returns from our existing
     distributors. For the fiscal years ending December 31, 2003 and 2004, there
     were no returns by distributors, except for insignificant amounts (which
     were made solely upon our discretion). We have a long-term relationship
     with a limited number of distributors, and the amount of sales to new
     distributors is immaterial.

NOTE 2-T IMPAIRMENT OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, PAGE F-14

     6.   YOUR ACCOUNTING POLICY FOR IMPAIRMENT OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT DOES
          NOT APPEAR TO CONFORM TO US GAAP. IN FUTURE FILINGS PLEASE EXPAND NOTE
          16 TO PROVIDE DISCLOSURE ABOUT THIS POTENTIAL ISRAELI/US GAAP
          DIFFERENCE.

     In future filings we will expand Note 16 to provide disclosure on the
     potential ISRAELI/US GAAP DIFFERENCES regarding impairment of property and
     equipment.

NOTE 10 (C) SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, PAGE F-24

     7.   WE SEE THAT CERTAIN OPTIONS WERE CANCELED AND RE-GRANTED IN DECEMBER
          2003. FOR US GAAP PURPOSES, TELL US HOW YOUR ACCOUNTING CONSIDERS THE
          GUIDANCE FROM FIN 44.

     In 2003, the tax authorities in Israel revised Section 102 to the Israeli
     Tax Code with regard to the taxation of stock options granted to employees.
     The revised section is only applicable to options granted subsequent to the
     revision of this section. In order to comply with the revised section, the
     company, as many other Israeli companies at that time, decided to cancel
     the old options and to immediately grant new options under the same terms
     (I.E., the same contractual life period, the same exercise price, the same
     number of shares, etc.) According to Fin 44, interpretation 31 "....A
     MODIFICATION TO A FIXED STOCK OPTION OR AWARD THAT DOES NOT AFFECT THE LIFE
     OF THE AWARD, THE EXERCISE PRICE, OR THE NUMBER OF SHARES TO BE ISSUED HAS
     NO ACCOUNTING CONSEQUENCE." As there was no change in the terms of the
     options, the action of the cancellation and the re-grant has no accounting
     consequence under FIN 44.

<PAGE>

                               [ACS-Tech80 LOGO]

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM, PAGE T-1

     8.   IN FUTURE FILINGS PLEASE REVISE THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE AUDIT
          REPORT TO REFER TO THE PCAOB BY ITS FULL NAME. THAT IS, THE PUBLIC
          COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD (UNITED STATES).

     In future filings we will ask the applicable auditors to revise their audit
     report and to refer to the PCAOB by its full name.

     9.   IN FUTURE FILING PLEASE DISCLOSE THE CITY AND STATE WHERE THE REPORT
          WAS SIGNED. REFER TO RULE 2-02 OF REGULATION S-X.

     In future filings we will ask the applicable auditors to revise their audit
     report and to disclose the city and state where the report was signed.

                                     * * * *

<PAGE>

                               [ACS-Tech80 LOGO]

     The Company hereby acknowledges that:

          o    The company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
               disclosure in this filing;

          o    Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff
               comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action
               with respect to filing; and

          o    The company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
               proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
               federal securities laws of the United States.

     If you have any questions or concerns, please call the undersigned at
     972-4-6546440.

                                                           Very truly yours,

                                                           ACS-Tech80 Ltd.

                                                           /s/ Ze'ev Kirshenboim
                                                           ---------------------
                                                           Ze'ev Kirshenboim
                                                           CEO and CFO

     cc:  Brian R. Cascio, Accounting Branch Chief - U.S. Securities and
          Exchange Commission
          Jeanne Bennett, Reviewing Accountant - U.S. Securities and Exchange
          Commission
          Dorit Ringelstein, VP Finance - ACS-Tech80 Ltd.
          Perry Wildes, Esq. - Gross, Kleinhendler, Hodak, Halevy, Greenberg &
          Co.
          Ronen Menashes, Ilan Gizbar, - Ernst & Young

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>