SEC Company Response from ACS - TECH 80 LTD (CIK 0001038144) — Sep 22, 2005
ACS - TECH 80 LTD (CIK 0001038144)
Date: Sept. 22, 2005 · CIK: 0001038144 · Accession: 0001178913-05-001355
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: August 5, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
[ACS-Tech80 LOGO]
VIA EDGAR AND COURIER
September 22, 2005
Gary R. Todd
Reviewing Accountant
Mail Stop 6010
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
U.S.A
RE: ACS-TECH80 LTD.
FORM 20-F FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
FORMS 6-K FOR 2005
FILE NO. 1-14662
Reference: Your letter dated August 5, 2005
Dear Mr. Todd:
Set forth herein are the responses of ACS-Tech80 Ltd. (the "Company") to the
comments contained in the comment letter of the staff of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Staff"), dated August 5, 2005, with respect to the
Company's Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form
20-F") filed with the Commission on June 21, 2005.
For your convenience, we have reprinted the Staff's written comments below prior
to the Company's responses. The numbering corresponds to the comment numbers in
the Staff's above referenced letter.
Courtesy copies have been sent to the Staff's examiners via courier.
<PAGE>
[ACS-Tech80 LOGO]
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS, PAGE 22
OPERATING RESULTS, PAGE 26
1. WE SEE THE 56% INCREASE IN REVENUES IN 2004. IN FUTURE FILINGS PLEASE
PROVIDE MORE DETAILED AND SPECIFIC DISCUSSION OF REASONS FOR THE
SIGNIFICANT INCREASE. FOR INSTANCE, PLEASE MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBE
HOW THE IMPROVED BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IMPACTED REVENUES. ALSO PROVIDE
SOME DESCRIPTION OF NEW PRODUCTS INTRODUCED AND THEIR IMPACT ON
REVENUES.
In future filings we will provide more detailed specific discussion of
significant changes in revenues. We will also provide description of new
products introduced and their impact on revenues.
2. WE READ IN NOTE 15 THAT YOU HAVE SEVERAL OPERATING SEGMENTS. TO THE
EXTENT IMPORTANT TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF YOUR OPERATING RESULTS, PLEASE
EXPAND FUTURE FILINGS TO DISCUSS AND TO COMPARE THE REVENUES GENERATED
BY EACH SEGMENT, AND THE OPERATING INCOME PRODUCED EACH SEGMENT.
In future filings we will provide information regarding the revenues and
operating income generated by each segment.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 2-K REVENUE RECOGNITION, PAGE F-12
3. WE SEE THAT THE REVENUE POLICIES MAKE DISCLOSURE ABOUT THE GENERIC
CRITERIA FROM SAB 104 FOR REVENUE RECOGNITION. PLEASE EXPAND FUTURE
FILINGS TO CLARIFY HOW YOU APPLY THOSE CRITERIA IN YOUR SPECIFIC
CIRCUMSTANCES. FOR INSTANCE, DISCLOSE WHAT YOU CONSIDER TO BE
"PERVASIVE EVIDENCE OF AN AGREEMENT" AND MAKE DISCLOSURE ABOUT THE
FACTORS YOU CONSIDER IN CONCLUDING THAT "COLLECTIBILITY IS PROBABLE."
ALSO CLARIFY SHIPPING TERMS AND IDENTIFY WHEN YOU CONSIDER DELIVERY TO
HAVE OCCURRED. YOUR RESPONSE SHOULD SHOW US HOW YOU INTEND TO APPLY
THIS COMMENT.
<PAGE>
[ACS-Tech80 LOGO]
In future filings, we will clarify how we apply the criteria from SAB 104
for revenue recognition. We intend to include the following disclosure in
our "revenue recognition" note:
"Revenues from product sales are recognized, net of discounts, in
accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 "REVENUE RECOGNITION"
when (i) delivery has occurred in accordance with the agreed upon terms
(usually ex-factory or FOB shipping point), (ii) there is persuasive
evidence of an agreement in the form of a signed detailed purchase order,
(iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, (iv) collection of the related
receivable is probable based on past experience in respect of existing
customers. With regard to new customers, the Company either requires
advance payment, or performs credit checks prior to extending any credit
(v) no further obligations exist on our part. We do not grant a right of
return. The Group markets its products through its direct sales force and
through distributors that are considered as final customers."
4. WE SEE THAT YOU CONSIDER WHETHER "SIGNIFICANT OBLIGATIONS" EXIST IN
ASSESSING THE TIMING OF REVENUE. PLEASE EXPAND FUTURE FILINGS TO MAKE
DISCLOSURE ABOUT THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF POST SHIPMENT OBLIGATIONS
AND CUSTOMER ACCEPTANCE PROTOCOLS, INCLUDING MORE SPECIFIC DETAIL
ABOUT HOW THERE MATTERS ARE CONSIDERED IN THE TIMING OF REVENUES. YOUR
RESPONSE SHOULD SHOW US HOW YOU INTEND TO APPLY THIS COMMENT.
As suggested in our response to Comment 3 above, note 2-K will be revised
to state "no further obligation" instead of "significant obligation" as we
do not have any post delivery obligation to our customers except for
customary warranty provisions.
The terms of sales to our customers do not include any obligation to
install our products at the customer's place of business, nor to provide
assistance in installation. No uncertainties exist regarding customer
acceptance as our customer purchase orders do not contain an acceptance
provision that applies after delivery has occurred. .
<PAGE>
[ACS-Tech80 LOGO]
5. TELL US MORE ABOUT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALES TO DISTRIBUTORS.
SHOW US THAT YOU REVENUE PRACTICES FOR TRANSACTIONS WITH THESE
ENTITIES ARE APPROPRIATE.
We do not grant our distributors a right of return, either formal or
informal. As such, the distributors are considered to be final customers.
We have an established experience of no returns from our existing
distributors. For the fiscal years ending December 31, 2003 and 2004, there
were no returns by distributors, except for insignificant amounts (which
were made solely upon our discretion). We have a long-term relationship
with a limited number of distributors, and the amount of sales to new
distributors is immaterial.
NOTE 2-T IMPAIRMENT OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, PAGE F-14
6. YOUR ACCOUNTING POLICY FOR IMPAIRMENT OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT DOES
NOT APPEAR TO CONFORM TO US GAAP. IN FUTURE FILINGS PLEASE EXPAND NOTE
16 TO PROVIDE DISCLOSURE ABOUT THIS POTENTIAL ISRAELI/US GAAP
DIFFERENCE.
In future filings we will expand Note 16 to provide disclosure on the
potential ISRAELI/US GAAP DIFFERENCES regarding impairment of property and
equipment.
NOTE 10 (C) SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, PAGE F-24
7. WE SEE THAT CERTAIN OPTIONS WERE CANCELED AND RE-GRANTED IN DECEMBER
2003. FOR US GAAP PURPOSES, TELL US HOW YOUR ACCOUNTING CONSIDERS THE
GUIDANCE FROM FIN 44.
In 2003, the tax authorities in Israel revised Section 102 to the Israeli
Tax Code with regard to the taxation of stock options granted to employees.
The revised section is only applicable to options granted subsequent to the
revision of this section. In order to comply with the revised section, the
company, as many other Israeli companies at that time, decided to cancel
the old options and to immediately grant new options under the same terms
(I.E., the same contractual life period, the same exercise price, the same
number of shares, etc.) According to Fin 44, interpretation 31 "....A
MODIFICATION TO A FIXED STOCK OPTION OR AWARD THAT DOES NOT AFFECT THE LIFE
OF THE AWARD, THE EXERCISE PRICE, OR THE NUMBER OF SHARES TO BE ISSUED HAS
NO ACCOUNTING CONSEQUENCE." As there was no change in the terms of the
options, the action of the cancellation and the re-grant has no accounting
consequence under FIN 44.
<PAGE>
[ACS-Tech80 LOGO]
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM, PAGE T-1
8. IN FUTURE FILINGS PLEASE REVISE THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE AUDIT
REPORT TO REFER TO THE PCAOB BY ITS FULL NAME. THAT IS, THE PUBLIC
COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD (UNITED STATES).
In future filings we will ask the applicable auditors to revise their audit
report and to refer to the PCAOB by its full name.
9. IN FUTURE FILING PLEASE DISCLOSE THE CITY AND STATE WHERE THE REPORT
WAS SIGNED. REFER TO RULE 2-02 OF REGULATION S-X.
In future filings we will ask the applicable auditors to revise their audit
report and to disclose the city and state where the report was signed.
* * * *
<PAGE>
[ACS-Tech80 LOGO]
The Company hereby acknowledges that:
o The company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure in this filing;
o Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff
comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action
with respect to filing; and
o The company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
federal securities laws of the United States.
If you have any questions or concerns, please call the undersigned at
972-4-6546440.
Very truly yours,
ACS-Tech80 Ltd.
/s/ Ze'ev Kirshenboim
---------------------
Ze'ev Kirshenboim
CEO and CFO
cc: Brian R. Cascio, Accounting Branch Chief - U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission
Jeanne Bennett, Reviewing Accountant - U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission
Dorit Ringelstein, VP Finance - ACS-Tech80 Ltd.
Perry Wildes, Esq. - Gross, Kleinhendler, Hodak, Halevy, Greenberg &
Co.
Ronen Menashes, Ilan Gizbar, - Ernst & Young
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>