SEC Company Response from IC ISAACS & CO INC (CIK 0001041179) — Nov 21, 2005
IC ISAACS & CO INC (CIK 0001041179)
Date: Nov. 21, 2005 · CIK: 0001041179 · Accession: 0001144204-05-036928
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-125396
Referenced dates: August 17, 2005, June 28, 2005, June 28, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Arent
Fox
PLLC
1675
Broadway
New
York,
New York 10019-5820
September
27, 2005
United
States Securities and
Exchange
Commission
100
F
Street, N.E.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Attn:
Adam Phippen, Staff Accountant
Re: I.C.
Isaacs & Company, Inc. (the “Company”)
Registration
Statement on Form S-2
File
No.
333-125396
Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004, as
amended
File
No. 0-23379
Dear
Mr.
Phippen:
In
accordance with your recent telephone conversation with Eugene Wielepski and
Tim
Tumminello, the Chief Financial Officer and Controller, respectively, of the
Company, and my telephone conversation with you last week, I have provided
you
with the Company’s proposed responses to the comments contained in Mr. Owings’
letter dated August 17, 2005. I have also provided to you a proposed amendment
to the Company’s 2004 Form 10-K which incorporates revisions that conform to the
Company’s proposed responses to those comments.
In
the
event that you advise me that the proposed responses and amendments are
acceptable, and that no further amendments need to be made with regard to the
10-K, the Company will file
·
the
amendment to the 10-K
·
amendments
to its March 31and June 30, 2005 Forms 10-Q which contain disclosures
conforming to the changes made in the Form 10-K amendment,
and
·
a
new amendment to its S-2 Registration
Statement.
Form
10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
General
1.
We
note your proposal to address all of the comments issued in our letter
dated June 28, 2005 via future filings. However, we believe the revisions
in the aggregate are substantive enough, particularly in light of
your
recent Form S-2 fling, to warrant an amendment to your Form 10-K
for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. Please note that the revisions
should
be made for all of the prior comments and not just for the issues
subject
to further comment below. Also, please make conforming amendments
to your
subsequent filings on Forms 10-Q, to the extent
applicable.
Adam
Phippen
September
27, 2005
Page
2
Response
to Comment 1
The
attached proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s 2004 Form 10-K addresses all
of the comments contained in Mr. Owings’ letters dated June 28 and August 17,
2005.
Item
7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and …, page 14
Year
Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003, page
15
2.
We
have reviewed your proposed disclosures in response to comment 1
in our
letter dated June 28, 2005 and find the proposed disclosures very
difficult to understand. Also, we are unclear as to why the systems
limitations you discuss would impact your ability to provide the
requested
disclosures. In this regard, we believe you could discuss the overall
change in your net sales by discussing first the factors that contributed
to the overall change in gross sales, and then discussing separately
the
change in sales returns and allowances and how this impacted net
sales for
the year.
With
respect to your discussion of the overall change in your gross sales,
it
appears, based on the information you have provided, that the change
in
overall sales volumes did not contribute significantly to the increase
in
gross revenues in fiscal 2004. Rather, the increased selling prices
of
your products, coupled with an increase in the volume of products
sold at
regular prices, rather than at promotional/discounted prices, caused
the
overall increase in gross revenues. If this is the case, please clarify
your disclosure accordingly and attempt to provide the information
in a
summarized format, as appropriate. If our understanding is incorrect,
please revise your disclosure to further clarify. Also, please note
that
the prior comment was issued with respect to the discussion of your
results of operations in general, and not just with respect to the
discussion of the changes in your net sales. Please revise your
disclosures accordingly.
Response
to Comment 2
The
Company has revised the disclosures contained in its 2004 Form 10-K to provide
more comprehensible reasons for the changes in its gross sales.
Item
15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, page 24
We
reviewed your response to comment 3 in our letter dated June 28,
2005.
Please address the part of the comment that relates to your Form
10-K
exhibit requirements, as it appears your response addresses only
your
proposed revisions to the Form S-2. As indicated in the prior comment,
it
appears that you have omitted from your Form 10-K a number of exhibits
required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K, including but not limited
to your
Articles of Incorporation, your Bylaws, your code of ethics, the
listing
of your subsidiaries, and copies of material contracts, such as the
Framework Agreement. Please revise to either include all required
exhibits
or to incorporate them by reference to previously filed documents.
Adam
Phippen
September
27, 2005
Page
3
Response
to Comment 3
The
proposed amendment to the 2004 Form 10-K contains all of the exhibits required
pursuant to Item 602 of Regulation S-K. Please note that the Framework
Agreement, as well as the agreements executed by the Company in connection
therewith are no longer in effect. Accordingly, they have not been included
in
the Exhibit Index.
Consolidated
Financial Statements, page F-2
Consolidated
Statements of Operations, page F-3
We
reviewed your response to comment 4 in our letter dated June 28,
2005 and
continue to believe you should revise your financial statements to
present
the loss on sale of property as an operating item. Refer to paragraph
45
of SFAS 144. We note your arguments that the land was never utilized
in
operations. However, we understand that you purchased the land in
order to
build a more modern distribution facility and believe your later
decision
to continue using your current facility as an operating decision
that had
consequences that should be reflected in operating income. Please
revise
your financial statements
accordingly.
Response
to Comment 4
The
Company has reclassified the loss on sale of the property as an operating
item.
The
accompanying marked Amendment to the Form 10-K has been prepared specifically
to
facilitate your review of the changes that the Company intends to make in
response to the comments contained in Mr. Owings’ letters dated June 28 and
August 17, 2005. If you find the proposed changes to be acceptable, the Company
will file the proposed Amendment No. 2 to the 2004 Form 10-K that was attached
to the email by which this letter was transmitted to you.
Upon
the
filing of that Amendment, the Company will file appropriate amendments to its
March 31 and June30, 2005 Forms 10-Q and its S-2 Registration Statement.
Adam
Phippen
September
27, 2005
Page
4
I
you
have any questions regarding the responses contained in this letter, please
do
not hesitate to contact me at your convenience at 212-484-3917.
Respectfully,
yours
/s/
Steven D. Dreyer
Steven
D. Dreyer
SDD/lo
Enclosures
cc:
Eugene
Wielepski