SEC Company Response from CNL RETIREMENT PROPERTIES INC (CIK 0001055264) — Oct 6, 2005
CNL RETIREMENT PROPERTIES INC (CIK 0001055264)
Date: Oct. 6, 2005 · CIK: 0001055264 · Accession: 0001055264-05-000058
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 000-32607
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
CNL Retirement CRC Response Letter
October
6, 2005
Securities
and Exchange Commission
450
Fifth
Street, N.W.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
CNL
Retirement Properties, Inc.
Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004
Filed
March 10, 2005
File
No. 000-32607
Ladies
and Gentlemen:
We
are in
receipt of the letter from the staff (the “staff”) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), dated September 22, 2005 to Mr. Clark
Hettinga, of CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (the “Company” or “we”).
We
acknowledge that the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing
is
our responsibility. We acknowledge the staff’s position that comments or changes
to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission
from
taking any action with respect to the filing. We also understand the staff’s
position that staff comments may not be asserted as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws
of
the United States.
The
Company’s responses to the staff’s comments are
set
forth below. For your convenience, we have included the staff’s comments herein
and keyed our responses accordingly.
Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004
Financial
Statements
Consolidated
Statements of Income, page 33
1.
Explain
to us how you determined that your Seniors’ Housing and Medical Office
Buildings facilities do not represent separate reportable segments
under
SFAS 131.
Response:
We
supplementally advise the staff that although the Company has diversified its
real estate portfolio by investing in different facility types, our Seniors’
Housing and Medical Office Buildings facilities do not represent separate
reportable segments based on the internal reporting and decision making as
set
forth in guidance in SFAS 131.
Specifically,
our chief operating decision making committee (our executive committee made
up
of our Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice
President of Acquisition and Finance, and Senior Vice President of Asset
Management) does not receive or use segmented reporting to determine financial
performance or allocate resources. Rather, revenues and expenses from all
property types are combined for profit measurability and decision making.
Management also tracks the underlying operations of facilities on a property
by
property basis to evaluate each property’s performance and make decisions on the
allocation of the Company’s resources.
Note
2
- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Intangible
Lease Costs, page 38
2.
Advise
us how renewal terms are considered in your accounting policy for
below-market leases.
Response:
We
supplementally advise the staff that our accounting policy for amortizing
below-market leases addresses renewal terms as follows:
·
For
renewal terms with rates approximating fair market value, the amortization
period for the below-market intangible lease liability is limited
to the
original lease term.
·
For
renewal terms with rates that are below fair market value, the
amortization period for the below-market intangible lease liability
includes both the original lease term and the renewal
term.
We
also
supplementally advise the staff that currently, none of the Company’s
below-market leases have renewal terms with rates that are below fair market
value.
*
*
*
After
you
have had the opportunity to review the attached, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (407) 835-3208 with any questions or further comments you might
have.
Sincerely,
/s/
Clark Hettinga
Clark
Hettinga
SVP
& Chief Financial Officer
2