SEC Comment Letter for PULITZER INC (CIK 0001068848) — Aug 25, 2005
PULITZER INC (CIK 0001068848)
Date: Aug. 25, 2005 · CIK: 0001068848 · Accession: 0000000000-05-044316
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
May 10, 2005
Via Facsimile (212) 318-3400 and U.S. Mail
Richard A. Palmer
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
666 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10103-3198
Re: Pulitzer, Inc.
PRER 14A filed on April 26, 2005
File No. 1-14541
Dear Mr. Palmer:
We have reviewed the above filing and have the following
comments. Where indicated, we think you should revise your
document
in response to these comments. If you disagree, we will consider
your explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable or a
revision
is unnecessary. Please be as detailed as necessary in your
explanation. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide
us
with supplemental information so we may better understand your
disclosure. After reviewing this information, we may or may not
raise additional comments.
The purpose of our review process is to assist you in your
compliance with the applicable disclosure requirements and to
enhance
the overall disclosure in your filing. We look forward to working
with you in these respects and welcome any questions you may have
about our comments or on any other aspect of our review. Feel
free
to call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this
letter.
Interests of our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger,
page
5
1. Disclose here and on page 8 the amount of the contingent fee
and
the success bonus and identify the directors whose firms will
receive
these payments.
The Merger, page 14
Background of the Merger, page 14
2. Revise the disclosure in the second new paragraph on page 17 to
clarify the relationship between Mr. Snowden and Huntleigh.
Reasons for the Merger, page 24
3. We reissue prior comment 9. Please revise this list into two
lists, one of reasons in favor of the merger, the other, of
reasons
against.
Opinion of our Financial Advisor, page 30
4. Since it appears that the LBO analysis is based on a price
lower
than that being offered to shareholders it is unclear why this
analysis supports a finding of fairness. Please revise to
explain.
Financial Projections, page 40
5. We reissue prior comment 15. The offensive language has simply
been moved to a different paragraph. Please revise to delete.
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences, page 47
6. We reissue prior comment 17. Please delete the initial
sentence
of the bolded paragraph on page 48.
Litigation Challenging the Merger, page 48
7. Continue to update this section as necessary.
Closing Comments
Please amend the Schedule 14A in response to these comments.
Marked copies of the amendments greatly facilitate our review.
Please furnish a cover letter with your amendment that keys your
responses to our comments and provides any requested supplemental
information. Please file the response letter as correspondence on
EDGAR. Detailed cover letters greatly facilitate our review.
You may contact Mathew C. Bazley at (202) 551-3382 with any
other questions or you may reach me at (202) 551-3750.
Sincerely,
Max A. Webb
Assistant Director
??
??
??
??
Pulitzer, Inc.
May 10, 2005
Page 1
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>