SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from FUSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC (CIK 0001071411) — Feb 11, 2005

FUSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC (CIK 0001071411)
Date: Feb. 11, 2005 · CIK: 0001071411 · Accession: 0000930413-05-000941

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 333-120412

Date
February 11, 2005
Author
Arthur S. Marcus, Esq.
Form
CORRESP
Company
FUSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC (CIK 0001071411)

Letter

GERSTEN, SAVAGE, KAPLOWITZ, WOLF & MARCUS, LLP 600 LEXINGTON AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 February 11, 2005 United States Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549 Attention: Cheryl Grant, Esq.

RE: FUSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. FILE NO, 333-120412

Dear Ms. Grant:

Please see our responses to your written comments of February 11, 2005.

Response #1:

As the Company stated, they track off-net revenues by customer and product. The Company tracks off-net costs of revenues by provider (vendor). This tracking analysis is consistent with the disclosure in the book.

Response #2:

Please note that the Company believes that it was operating within the statute and notes the fact that it represented a very small amount of revenues. More importantly, the Company does not believe that the fact that Efonica had dealings with Libya during the time that Libya was both identified as a state sponsor of terrorism and subject to OFAC-administered economic sanctions raises any risk that it would have a potential impact on Fusion's reputation and share value that would cause Efonica's relationship with the Libyan reseller to be material to Fusion or pose a material risk to Fusion's security holders, especially considering the current status of the United State's relationship with Libya.

Sincerely,
\s\ Arthur S. Marcus, Esq.
--------------------------
Arthur S. Marcus, Esq.

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
                 GERSTEN, SAVAGE, KAPLOWITZ, WOLF & MARCUS, LLP
                              600 LEXINGTON AVENUE
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022

                                                               February 11, 2005

United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attention:  Cheryl Grant, Esq.

         RE:      FUSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                  FILE NO, 333-120412

Dear Ms. Grant:

         Please see our responses to your written comments of February 11, 2005.

         Response #1:

                  As the Company stated, they track off-net revenues by customer
         and product.  The Company  tracks off-net costs of revenues by provider
         (vendor).  This tracking  analysis is consistent with the disclosure in
         the book.

         Response #2:

                  Please note that the Company  believes  that it was  operating
         within the statute and notes the fact that it  represented a very small
         amount of revenues. More importantly, the Company does not believe that
         the fact that  Efonica  had  dealings  with Libya  during the time that
         Libya was both  identified  as a state sponsor of terrorism and subject
         to  OFAC-administered  economic sanctions raises any risk that it would
         have a  potential  impact on Fusion's  reputation  and share value that
         would  cause  Efonica's  relationship  with the Libyan  reseller  to be
         material  to  Fusion  or  pose a  material  risk to  Fusion's  security
         holders,  especially  considering  the  current  status  of the  United
         State's relationship with Libya.

                                            Sincerely,

                                            \s\ Arthur S. Marcus, Esq.
                                            --------------------------
                                             Arthur S. Marcus, Esq.

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>