SEC Company Response from ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS INC (CIK 0001080029) — Dec 2, 2005
ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS INC (CIK 0001080029)
Date: Dec. 2, 2005 · CIK: 0001080029 · Accession: 0001080029-05-000024
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: November 16, 2005, November 7, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
SEC Comment Letter Response - December 2, 2005
Ascendant
Solutions, Inc.
16250
Dallas Parkway, Suite 205
Dallas,
TX 75248
December
2, 2005
Mr.
Jorge
Bonilla
Mr.
Wilson K. Lee
Division
of Corporation Finance
United
States Securities and Exchange Commission
100
F
Street N.E.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
Ascendant
Solutions, Inc.
Form
10-K for the year ended 12/31/2004 (“Original Form 10-K”)
Filed
3/29/2005
Form
10-Q for the period ended 3/31/2005 (“Form 10-Q”)
Filed
5/12/2005
File
Nos. 0-27945
Dear
Messrs. Bonilla and Lee:
This
letter sets forth responses of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) to the
comment letter dated November 16, 2005, from the staff of the Securities
and
Exchange Commission (the “Commission), in response to the Company’s comment
response letter dated November 7, 2005. Please note that the following responses
are keyed to coincide with your November 16, 2005 comment letter.
FORM
10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
Financial
Statements and Notes
Note
1
- Organization and Significant Accounting Policies
Significant
Accounting Policies
Basis
of Presentation, page 46
1. Response:
The Company owned 100% of the limited partnership interests of Fairways Frisco
at December 31, 2004. The Company made its investment of $154,000 in Fairways
Frisco on December 31, 2004 at approximately 5:00 pm because it was the only
limited partner in town at the time of the closing. In accordance with the
provisions of SOP
78-9,
paragraph
10,
the
Company consolidated Fairways Frisco at December 31, 2004 as it owned greater
than 50% of the limited partnership interests. The Fairways Frisco limited
partnership agreement provides that major decisions must be approved by a
majority of the limited partners. These major decisions, as further defined
in
the partnership agreement, include the important rights set forth in paragraph
9
of SOP
78-9,
with
the exception of the right to replace the general partner (other than for
cause). Therefore, as the only limited partner at the close of business on
December 31, 2004, the Company was deemed to have the controlling interest
in
the limited partnership.
In
January of 2005, other limited partners contributed capital to Fairways Frisco
and the Company ceased to be the controlling limited partner since it no
longer
had the sole decision authority for the major decisions in the limited
partnership agreement.
-1-
Jorge
Bonilla
Wilson
K.
Lee
December
2, 2005
Additionally,
the Company consolidates CRESA Partners of Orange Co., L.P. as it owns 99%
of
the limited partnership interests and because it has approval rights over
certain “major decisions”, as further defined in the partnership agreement,
including, but not limited to the important rights set forth in paragraph
9 of
SOP
78-9,
with
the exception of the right to replace the general partner (other than for
cause).
FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2005
Note
2
- Description of Business
Significant
Accounting Policies
Investments
in Limited Partnerships, page 6
3.
Response: The Company continues to believe that it is appropriate to use
the
cost method of accounting for the following reasons:
a.
The
Company currently owns approximately 12.6% of the limited partnership
interests of Fairways Frisco, and this percentage is continuing
to decline
as additional capital is contributed to the partnership by parties
other
than the Company in order to fund
development.
b.
Multiple
buildings are planned to be started by Fairways Frisco in the next
6
months, resulting in additional capital calls by Fairways Frisco
of over
$20 million. This would bring the total partnership capital of
Fairways
Frisco to over $30 million. The Company intends to fund none of
these
capital calls. As a result, the Company’s interest in Fairways Frisco is
expected to be less than 4%.
c.
Discussions
with institutional investors are ongoing for a capital infusion
in excess
of $20 mm for 2006 and beyond.
d.
Once
the Company’s interest is below 5%, it will be required under the
provisions of SFAS 154 to restate its financial statements back
to the
cost method. (i.e. return them to how they are now
stated)
e.
The
equity method of accounting will not result in a more accurate
reflection
of the company’s economic interest in Fairways Frisco, as the Company is
not required to fund any operating losses or debts of Fairways
Frisco.
There is no impairment of the Company’s recorded investment in Fairways
Frisco, and the Company does not believe that recording this investment
under the cost method is a misstatement of its financial
statements.
f.
The
Company is not obligated to fund any capital requirements, including
any
accumulated operating losses, for Fairways Frisco. The Company
does not
have any current plans to make additional capital contributions
to
Fairways Frisco.
g.
A
complicated history of 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K disclosures (including
amendments to implement the equity method) will become more confusing
to
readers if the Company is required to switch from the cost method
to the
equity method and then back to the cost method within a short period
of
time. The Company does not believe that multiple restatements of
its
financial statements which ultimately results in the use of the
cost
method (as is currently used) would be in the best interest of
readers of
the Company’s financial statements.
h.
No
limited partner distributions are expected for the foreseeable
future
i.
Restating
multiple quarters of financial statements places a significant
administrative and expense burden on small public company
resources.
j.
EITF
Topic D-46 states that “the SEC staff understands
that practice generally
has viewed investments of greater than 3 to 5 percent to be more
than
minor.” The Company does not view this guidance as an absolute rule
requiring the use of the equity method in light of the factors
sighted
above and the fact that it has no influence over the operating
and
financial policies of Fairways
Frisco.
-2-
Jorge
Bonilla
Wilson
K.
Lee
December
2, 2005
The
Company expects the impact of changing the method of accounting for its
investment in Fairways Frisco from the cost method to the equity method would
be
to record equity in the losses of Fairways Frisco in the range of $400,000to
$500,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The Company would
record
its interest in the net losses of Fairways Frisco for each of the first three
quarters of 2005. This would reduce the carrying amount of the Company’s
investment in Fairways Frisco. This adjustment would have no impact on net
working capital, nor would it have any impact on the Company’s overall
obligations with respect to Fairways Frisco’s development activities. The
Company’s exposure under the limited partnership agreement is limited to the
recorded amount of its investment and it is not liable for any debts or losses
incurred by Fairways Frisco.
The
Company is not opposed to disclosure going forward in its Annual Report on
Form
10-K and its interim reports on Form 10-Q of the operating results, financial
position and appraised real estate values of Fairways Frisco. This disclosure
would also inform readers that the Company has no obligation to fund any
actual
or expected operating losses during the early development period or any debts
of
Fairways Frisco. The Company believes this disclosure is preferable to multiple
offsetting restatements of its financial statements that end up having no
net
impact on its retained earnings or the recorded value of its investment in
Fairways Frisco
Additionally,
the Company hereby makes the following representations and
acknowledgements:
A. The
Company represents that it is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of
the
disclosure in its Form 10-K Filings and Form 10-Q Filings;
B. The
Company acknowledges that staff comments or changes to disclosure in response
to
staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with
respect to the Form 10-K Filings and Form 10-Q Filings; and
C. The
Company acknowledges that it may not assert staff comments as a defense in
any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal
securities laws of the United States.
Please
contact me with any additional information requests or further comments with
respect to the 10-K Filings and Form 10-Q that you might have.
Sincerely
yours,
Ascendant
Solutions,
Inc.
By:
/s/
Gary W. Boyd
Gary
W. Boyd
Vice
President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
-3-