SEC Company Response from Kuber Resources Corp (KUBR) (CIK 0001081834) (KUBR) — Apr 18, 2006
Kuber Resources Corp (KUBR) (CIK 0001081834)
Date: April 18, 2006 · CIK: 0001081834 · Accession: 0001264931-06-000186
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
CWTD CORRESP 04/18/2006
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
To
Whom
It May Concern:
We
are
writing in response to an inquiry requesting a description of our audit of
the
financial statements of China World Trade Corporation.
We
have a
number of clients located throughout Asia. In performing the audits of our
Asian
clients, we use no other audit firm to assist in the audit. When a client uses
the services of another audit firm, as many do, we treat the work of such a
firm
as if it were an internal audit group of the client. We place no more reliance
on such work than we would on the work of any company’s internal audit group.
Our review of such auditors’ work is part of our assessment of internal controls
used in planning and performing our audit. Our staff auditors go on site
personally to perform the audit fieldwork. Our audit team consists of full-time
employees from Utah, contract employees from Hong Kong, and a Mandarin speaking
audit manager whom we regularly contract from another PCAOB registered firm
located in Utah. In addition to the audit staff on-site, the engagement partner
visits and tours the facilities of each new client, meets with management,
and
reviews the on-site audit work being performed. Typically, the majority of
required audit procedures are performed at the client’s facilities in Asia, and
then most of the required upper level reviews are performed in the U.S. before
completion of the audit.
The
audit
of China World Trade Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31,
2005,
was conducted slightly differently than we usually conduct our audits of clients
in Asia. Due to the nature and timing of the audit, we felt it was necessary
to
enhance the quality of the audit by using more experienced auditors, who are
located in Utah, to perform most of the audit work. Whereas we typically prefer
to have our audit staff perform nearly all the fieldwork at the client’s
facilities, we did a fair amount of the fieldwork in our Salt Lake City office.
Our staff performed necessary on-site inspections and management inquiries
at
the client’s facilities, but client personnel flew to Salt Lake City with
schedules and supporting documents we requested so that we could complete the
audit in our office. We were comfortable issuing our audit opinion based on
the
on-site inspections and inquiries performed in combination with the level of
audit personnel performing the audit with the assistance of client personnel
at
our offices.
Please
contact me at your convenience if there are further questions.
Very
best
regards,
/s/
Marty D. Van Wagoner, CPA
Marty
D. Van Wagoner, CPA
Child,
Van Wagoner & Bradshaw, PLLC