SEC Company Response from ELEPHANT TALK COMMUNICATIONS INC (CIK 0001084384) — Jul 13, 2005
ELEPHANT TALK COMMUNICATIONS INC (CIK 0001084384)
Date: July 13, 2005 · CIK: 0001084384 · Accession: 0001017386-05-000085
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: June 20, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
438 East Katella Ave, Suite 217
Elephant Talk Orange, California 92867
Communications, Inc. Tel: (714) 288 1570
OTC: ETLK Fax: (714) 288 2045
July 13, 2005
Via fax: (202) 772-9205
-----------------------
Mr. Dave Walz
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N. W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re: Elephant Talk Communications, Inc.
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 Filed
April 1, 2005
File No. 0-30061
Dear Mr. Walz:
Please review the attached response to Comment No. 7 of your letter dated June
20, 2005. Should you have further questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Manu Ohri
Chief Financial Officer
Attachments
<PAGE>
Response to Comment No. 7 - June 20, 2005 Letter from SEC
---------------------------------------------------------
And Note 16: Subsequent Events, page F-24, May 5, 2005 Letter from SEC
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please review the attached supporting information with respect to the above
referenced comment:
Background of the transaction:
On April 3, 2004, Elephant Talk Communications, Inc. (the "Company") signed a
Share Exchange Agreement with Keen Solution Group Limited (Keen Solution), a
company incorporated in British Virgin Island ("BVI"), to acquire from Keen
Solution, 60% equity ownership interest in Urumqui General System Technology
Company Ltd. ("General System"), a company registered in the Peoples Republic of
China (PRC). As a consideration for the acquisition, on July 26, 2004, the
Company issued 4,000,000 restricted common shares valued at $480,000 as the
earnest deposit to Keen Solution. The transaction could not be completed due to
the rules and regulations relating to telecommunication companies enforced by
the Ministry of Information Industry in China for foreign companies.
The parties restructured the Share Exchange Agreement whereby, Keen Solution
formed True Precise Technology Limited ("True Precise"), a limited liability
company registered in BVI. True Precise agreed to provide exclusive technical
consultancy and advisory services to General System through its wholly owned
foreign enterprise subsidiary Urumqi Jingyi Technology Limited ("UJT"), a PRC
company. On January 5, 2005, the Company and Keen Solution completed a
transaction whereby the Company, through its 60% equity ownership interest in
True Precise, agreed to issue an additional 19,137,500 restricted common shares
to Keen Solution, in exchange for providing exclusive technical consultancy and
advisory services to General System for a service fee of RMB10,000,000
(US$1,204,820) per year for a contractual term of ten (10) years. On May 10,
2005, the Company issued to Keen Solution the remaining 19,137,500 restricted
common shares valued at $956,875 as the balance of consideration to complete its
obligation.
The Company recorded its 60% equity investment in True Precise valued at
$1,436,875 by issuance of its 23,137,500 restricted common shares. As a result
of this acquisition, True Precise became a majority owned subsidiary of the
Company. The Company recorded an intangible asset named "Contractual Agreement"
amounting to $1,360,248 being the difference between the fair value of True
Precise's net assets received over the consideration paid by the Company. The
value of Contractual Agreement will be amortized over the life of the
contractual term of ten (10) years.
The Company reviewed the applicability of the True Precise transaction under
FASB Interpretation No. 46 "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities", and
discussed its scope and applicability with Dave Walz, SEC Staff Accountant, and
Carlos Pacho, Senior Assistant Chief Accountant on July 11, 2005. Based upon the
discussions, it was determined that the True Precise acquisition does not fall
under the scope and applicability of FASB Interpretation No. 46. Also, the
acquisition of 60% ownership in True Precise was not considered a business
combination under FASB 141, `Business Combinations' because True Precise did not
meet the definition of a business under EITF 98-3.
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>