SEC Company Response from GLOBAL DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES INC (CIK 0001090461) — Jul 15, 2005
GLOBAL DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES INC (CIK 0001090461)
Date: July 15, 2005 · CIK: 0001090461 · Accession: 0001266068-05-000147
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-8321
Referenced dates: June 6, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Global SEC Comment Response 7-14-05
GLOBAL
DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES, INC.
1200
AIRPORT DRIVE
CHOWCHILLA,
CA 93610
559-665-5800
July
14,
2005
VIA
FAX AND EDGAR
Mr.
Josh
Forgione
Division
of Corporate Finance
U.S.
Securities & Exchange Commission
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
Global Diversified Industries, Inc.
File
No.
333-8321
Form
10-KSB for Year Ended April 30, 2004
Forms
10-QSB for quarters ended October 31, 2004
Dear
Mr.
Forgione:
This
will
acknowledge receipt of your letter of comment dated June 6, 2005 with regard
to
the above referenced filings. We apologize in advance for the delay in
responding. We have limited internal resources, which delayed the compilation
of
the materials and information required to accurately and completely respond
to
your comments. Our responses reference your comment numbers as
follows:
Comment
1
As
of
April 30, 2004, the Company’s plan assets acquired and accounted for under FAS
141 and FAS 142 are comprised of the following:
Description
Basis
of Accounting
Capitalized
Acquisition
costs
Capitalized
Filing and Regulatory Fees
Total
Capitalized
Costs
Acquisition
of 24’x 40’, 30’x32’,36’/38’x40’, 2 story, 12’x40’ restroom from Stafford
Associates (Architects) and Anderson & Doig (Engineers) ( per FAS
142)
FAS
142
$
111,828
$
111,828
Acquisition
of Majestic model building plans from Kaestner ( Architects)
FAS
141
10,300
10,300
Acquisition
of MBS plans from MBS Construction, Inc.
FAS
141
62,490
-
62,490
Fees
paid to Geiger Graphics (Architect) and SBA Consulting (Engineers)
ensuring plans are within current code
FAS
142
-
60,170
60,170
Fees
paid to Geiger Graphics (Architect) and Sierra Consulting for bringing
plans up to current code and other modifications
FAS
142
-
58,418
58,418
Fees
paid to Lawder, D Beamon and Accument (engineering) for bringing
MBS plans
up to current code and other modifications
FAS
141
-
27,994
27,994
State
regulatory fees and costs in connection with the having plans checked
FAS
141 and 142
-
51,314
51,314
184,618
197,896
382,514
Less:
Accumulated Amortization
(18,724)
Balance
at April 30, 2004
$
363,790
Comment
2
From
its
inception, the Company has capitalized the cost of proprietary plans acquired
from third parties, in connection with business combinations and most recently
through an auction conducted by Bankruptcy Trustee, along with the costs
and
fees associated with keeping the plans current with the State of California
in
accordance with FAS 141 and 142, respectively. The Company acquired the plans
with the expectation that it will be able to derive benefit from the plans
for
at least ten years but for no more than fifteen years.
As
a
result of their proprietary nature, the Company considers the plans intellectual
property. Once acquired , the Company controls and owns , or has an unlimited
license to use the property , which contributes directly to the Company’s
revenues from operations and ultimately will result in cash flow from
operations. Without the certified plans, the Company could not carry out
its
economic activities, comprised solely of the manufacture and distribution
of its
modular structures and would be forced to discontinue its operations. As
a
result, the plans are considered by the Company its most significant economic
resource
While
the
Company’s plans to do not guaranty the Company will generate revenues and cash
flow from operations, at the time of the acquisition of the plans, the Company’s
management believes the plans will provide a probable future benefit, in
combination with the Company’s other assets, - physical plant and management
expertise- to contribute directly to the Company’s future net cash inflows.
Accordingly,
the Company believes the capitalized plans meet the definition of an assets
under Financial Concepts Statement No 6.
-
Comment
3
As
requested, the following is an impairment analysis at the individual plan
level.
Projected
Cash Flow
(Use)
Projected
cash flow
(disposition)
Estimated
cash flow
Probability
Probability
Weighted Cash Flows
$
1,153,551
$
-
$
1,153,551
70%
$
807,486
2,883,878
-
2,883,878
20%
576,776
3,806,718
-
3,806,718
10%
380,672
$1,764,933
A
summary
of the assumptions made in projecting the future cash flows to test the
recoverability of the plans were as follows:
Expected
period of service potential: 10
years
Cash
flow
from disposition at the end of the holding period: None
Risk
free
interest rate: 10
year
treasury note¹
The
estimates were based upon the existing service potential of the plans to
the
Company. The Company considered all available evidence and past experience
of
the Company’s principal shareholders and officers in completing the future cash
flows.
Due
to a
number of factors, the plan assets are intermingled and separate identification
of the plan assets is impossible without imposing undue hardship on the
Company’s limited financial resources. In accordance FAS 144, the Company has
tested for impairment at the aggregate plan level. The Company’s management
believes the plan assets are grouped at
the
lowest level for which there are cash flows that are identifiable and that
the
cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groupings of
Company assets.
While
cash flows from individual plans cannot currently be separately identified,
management believes in the future, they will have the resources necessary
to
separately identify cash flows from individual plan assets.
1
While FAS 144 does not require a the use of a discount rate in testing for
recoverability, the Company decided to utilize a risk -free rate in its future
cash flows
The
Company estimated its future cash flows to test the recoverably of the asset,
based upon the expected future cash flows that are directly associated with,
and
are expected to arise, as a direct result of using and eventually disposing
of
the plans. The Company considers the plans as its primary asset (in the
aggregate), and as a result, its most significant cash flow generating
intangible asset being amortized
Aggregate
cash flows of the plans have been considered in measuring their respective
fair
values, and no evidence has suggested that any of the individual plans has
been
impaired as of the testing date.
Based
upon the Company’s estimates of future cash flows, the Company determined that
the carrying value of the plan assets at April 30, 2004 did not exceed the
estimated future cash flows directly associated with , and that are expected
to
arise, as a direct result of using the plan assets , and accordingly, the
Company has not recognized any impairment related to its plans, as the existing
service potential of the plans has not been diminished.
Comment
4
The
Company currently has five (5) certified active plans and the number of modular
units by plan sold for each of the plans during the last 24 months is as
follows:
Building
Type
PC#
Number
Sold
24x40
02-105411
128
30x32
02-105412
21
36/48x40
02-105410
126
MBS
02-105379
55
12x40
Restroom
02-105485
12
The
Company also has a two addition plans, a two-story structure, and the Majestic
model. The two-story plan’s PC is pending (i.e. state certification ), and
accordingly has no sales to date. The Company anticipates receipt of the
PC by
November 2005. The Company anticipates that it may expensel the carrying
value
of the Majestic Model (approximately $ 10,000) during 2005 because the current
projected cost of manufacturing the structure does not allow the Company
to
effectively market the model to California School Districts.
Comment
5
Since
the
Company is a manufacturing enterprise, and not a contractor, the Company
historically has not applied SOP 81-1 historically to its financial statements.
The Company accumulates and capitalizes all costs directly associated with
the
manufacture of its modular structures as work in process. When the structure
is
sold, the Company records the sale and charges the costs accumulated within
work
in process to cost of sales. The typical sales cycle lasts 90 to 120 days-
from
beginning of the manufacturing process to the completion and delivery of
the
modular unit.
Had
the
Company applied paragraph 75 of SOP 81-1, and capitalized the costs of the
plans
in anticipation of successfully procuring the contracts, and then expensing
those costs in connection with the completion and delivery of the structures
under the initial contract, the Company calculates that costs of sales would
have increased approximately $ 216,000 to approximately $ 2,776,877 in 2004.
This represents the cost of the plans acquired and capitalized pursuant to
FAS
142 for structures manufactured and sold in 2004 (as described in response
to
comment 1 above), adjusted for the cost of the Majestic and the two story
model
plans that were not manufactured in 2004. The Company’s revenues would remain
unchanged for the year ended April 30, 2004.
There
would be no significant change to the Company’s costs for the year ended April
30, 2003.
While
the
Company would have had to charge to cost of sales the plans acquired under
FAS
142, the Company would have reclassified previously expensed internal costs
to
deferred pre-contract costs during the year. While these costs would be
capitalized and charged to operations with each specific contract, as a result
of the Company’s increased growth in production, the deferred pre-contract cost
account would have a perpetual balance increasing as production
increased.
These
internal pre-contract costs would be comprised of the following:
Cost
of
estimators $
65,000
Marketing
133,210
Planners
and architects
209,852
State
and
other regulatory fees
6,029
As
a
result, the Company believes the application of SOP 81-1 would not have a
material impact on the Company’s historical financial statements.
We
believe the foregoing fairly responds to the Comments. The Company is prepared
to provide to the staff any additional information required by the staff
in
connection with it review.
We
thank
you in advance for your assistance in this matter. Since we are in the process
of preparing our financial statements in connection with the year ended April
30, 2005 to be included in our Annual Report o n Form 10K SB, we respectfully
request an expedited review of our responses. If you have any questions or
additional comments, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
GLOBAL
DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES, INC.
/s/
Phillip O Hamilton
__________________________
Phillip
O
Hamilton
Chairman
& CEO