SEC Company Response from GLOBAL DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES INC (CIK 0001090461) — Aug 10, 2005
GLOBAL DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES INC (CIK 0001090461)
Date: Aug. 10, 2005 · CIK: 0001090461 · Accession: 0001266068-05-000165
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 000-251161, 333-8321
Referenced dates: July 28, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Global SEC Comment Response 8-2-05
GLOBAL
DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES, INC.
1200
AIRPORT DRIVE
CHOWCHILLA,
CA 93610
559-665-5800
August
2,
2005
VIA
FAX AND EDGAR
Mr.
Josh
Forgione
Division
of Corporate Finance
U.S.
Securities & Exchange Commission
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Re:
Global Diversified Industries, Inc.
File
No.
333-8321
Form
10-KSB for Year Ended April 30, 2004
Forms
10-QSB for quarters ended October 31, 2004
Dear
Mr.
Forgione:
This
will
acknowledge receipt of your letter of comment dated July 28, 2005 with regard
to
the above referenced filings. Our responses reference your comment numbers
as
follows:
Comment
1
The
following is a summary of the period in which each proprietary plan asset was
initially capitalized and the periods in which subsequent modifications costs
were incurred.
Year
Ended April 30,
2003
Balance
at
April 30, 2003
Year
Ended April 30,
2004
Balance
at
April
30, 2004
Description
of plans
Acquisition
Cost
Code
Improvement and State Architect Fees
Acquisition
Cost
Code
Improvement
costs
and State Architect Fees
24x40
PC#02-105411
30x32
PC#02-105412
36/48x40
PC#02-105410
12x40
Restroom PC#02-105485
Two
Story PC applied for
Sub-Total
1
Bulk purchase of plan assets - see footnote 2 below
$
111,825
$
62,023
$
173,848
57,039
230,887
MBS
Plan
60,515
-
60,515
-
91,112
151,627
$
172,340
$
62,023
$
234,363
-
$
148,151
$
382,514
For
a
detailed summary of the acquisitions , please refer to our response to comment
2
Comment
2
For
the
period ending April 30, 2003 there were two acquisitions of plan assets from
two
parities.
Acquisition
1 (Asset Acquisition)
Initially,
the Company purchased the rights to use the following plans prepared by the
architect, Stafford & Associates2
and the
engineers, Anderson & Doig3 :
24
x 40
PC# 02-105411
30
x 32
PC# 02-105412
36/48x40
PC# 02-105410
12
x 40
Restroom PC# 02-105485
Two
Story
PC
applied for
The
architect and engineer had originally designed these plans in 1996 for
Pacesetter Industries, Inc, which was a major modular manufacturing company
that
had annual revenues of approximately $35 million with their main clients being
California school districts. Pacesetter declared bankruptcy, Chapter 7, on
February 2000. The architect and engineer maintained ownership of these plans
through the copyright law.
The
Company was aware of facts shown above and signed an agreement with both the
architect and engineer that allowed the Company to use these plans on an
unlimited basis. The fees paid to the architect and engineer for these rights
totaled $66,090 and $45,735 respectively, These costs were capitalized during
the year ended April 30, 2003.
Since
the
plans were drawn in 1996, they needed to be updated to the current codes
established by the California State Architect. Subsequent fees were paid to
outside architects and engineers to bring all of these drawings up to the
current codes, plus the new consultants became the “Architect of Record” and
“Engineer of Record”. These fees totaled $74,551, of which, $20,392 were
capitalized in FYE April 30, 2003, $54,159 in FYE April 30, 2004.
The
State
Architect was paid fees to review all the plans for compliance to the new codes
plus changing the Architect and Engineer of Record. Total fees of $49,081 were
capitalized with $46,201 recorded in FYE April 30, 2003 and $2,880 in FYE April
30, 2004.
The
Company received approval by the State Architect on two of the plans during
the
quarter ended July 31, 2003, which allowed the company to start production.
Except for the two story model, the remaining plans were approved during the
FYE
April 30, 20044 .
The
Company did not have any involvement in the preparation of the engineering
plans
acquired through the acquisition of MBS.
Acquisition
2 (Business Combination)
The
second plan acquisition occurred through the acquisition of MBS Construction,
Inc , a company that had ceased operations , as a wholly owned subsidiary on
February 28, 20035
The
shareholders of MBS were given $158,262 cash payable over one year, 3 million
shares of the Company’s restricted common stock plus 1.5 million “cash less”
warrants with an exercise price of three cents per share. In addition, the
shareholders of MBS maintained their employment with the Company and received
compensation and benefits that are standard in the industry. The assets acquired
and liabilities assumed of MBS at the date of acquisition were as
follows:
Assets:
Cash
1,500
Raw
Material Inventory
24,511
Finished
Goods Inventory
79,990
Property
Plant Equipment
70,421
Accumulated
Depreciation
-9,889
Engineering
Plans
60,515
Other
assets
13,979
Liabilities
Accounts
Payable
36,515
Accrued
Liabilities
44,874
The
assets were valued at MBS’s historical costs which approximated fair
value
The
Company did not have any involvement in the preparation of the engineering
plans
acquired through the acquisition of MBS.
Acquisition
3 (Asset acquisition)
On
March
11, 2005, the Company acquired certain intangible assets, including eight (8)
propriety plans, trademarks, and software from at a Bankruptcy auction in
exchange for $500,0006 .
The
Company has initially allocated the cost of the assets as follows:
Proprietary
plans (8)
$
465,000
Trademarks
10,000
Domain
names
5,000
Customer
data bases
10,000
Cooperative
Purchase Agreement
10,000
$
500,000
The
Company has engaged an outside consultant, who is in the process of completing
a
valuation of the identifiable assets , which the Company will use in connection
with the preparation of its April 30, 2005 financial statements.
The
Company did not have any involvement in the preparation of the engineering
plans
acquired through the acquisition of the plans from the Trustee.
Comment
3
Currently
Global tracks the financial P&L by Project/Client, which normally includes
multiple building sizes. The schools may require an administration building,
a
restroom and different size classrooms, all of which may utilize three to four
of Global’s PCs. The total contract is calculated by taking the sum total of the
estimated cost of each modular building. The same size modular building (PC)
may
be different in price due to cabinets, different partitions layouts, or
inclusion of a restroom.
As
a part
of the contract, Global will do the site work through its wholly owned
subsidiary, MBS Construction, for the entire project that provides for
foundations, and related infrastructure work. The site work performed by MBS
is
tracked separately from the manufacturing cost of the modular
buildings.
We
can
assign a value of each plan to the specific contracts and develop a schedule
that will satisfy the request. We do have a limited accounting staff, but will
assign the necessary staff to complete the project if required.
Comment
4
The
Company has reviewed SOP 81-1 and has concluded that its contracts fall within
SOP 81-1. Accordingly, the Company’s accounting policy for accounting for
revenues and costs under 81-1 will be as follows:
Revenue
Recognition
Construction
Contracts
Construction
contracts are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting
and, therefore, take into account the costs, estimated earnings and revenue
to
date on contracts not yet completed.
Revenue
recognized is that percentage of the total contract price that cost expended
to
date bears to anticipated final total cost, based on current estimates of costs
to complete.
Contract
costs include all direct material and labor costs and certain indirect costs
related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools,
repairs, and depreciation costs. Selling, general, and administrative costs
are
charged to expense as incurred. At the time a loss on a contract becomes known,
the entire amount of the estimated ultimate loss is recognized in the
consolidated financial statements.
Claims
for additional contract costs are only recognized upon a signed change order
from the customer.
The
current asset, “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
contracts,” represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. The
current liability, “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
contracts,” represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.
Allowances
for Contract Adjustments
We
maintain allowances for contract adjustments that result from the inability
of
our customers to make their required payments. Management bases its allowances
on analysis of the aging of accounts receivable, by account, at the date of
the
financial statements, assessments of historical collection trends, and an
evaluation of the impact of current economic conditions. If the financial
condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment
of
their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Other
Products
Sales
of
other products are recognized when products are shipped and the customer takes
ownership and assumes risk of loss, collection of the related accounts
receivable is probable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the
sales price is fixed or determinable
Comment
6
The
Company’s accounting policy is to expense in the period incurred all costs
associated with pre-contract costs, including those costs described in our
response.
Our
calculation of internal pre-contract costs was a theoretical response to as
to
the impact on the Company’s financial statements if the Company elected to
capitalize its pre-contact costs and expensed them in the period the contract
is
completed and the product shipped.
The
Company currently does not plan to capitalize such costs.
Comment
7
Assuming
the plan costs are considered assets identifiable intangible assets under 142
and 141 , the Company’s historical financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows would not be affected by the application of 81-1 by the revision
to the Company’s accounting policies described in our response to comment 4.
Should
the Company be forced to charge the costs of the plans to operations in the
period incurred, the Company’s net loss would increase from $ 428,067 to $
558,520 and $ 528,836 to $ 762,173 for the years ended April 30, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
Other
As
a
follow up to a question raised by the Staff during our last conference call
, we
have researched the accounting practices in our industry in connection with
the
accounting for and reporting of the cost of their architectural and engineering
plans assets.
Accordingly,
we reviewed the filings of Modtech Holdings , Inc. the largest publicly-held
manufacturer of re-locatable modular school structures in the state of
California (SEC file No.000-251161 ).
Modtech’s
Annual Report on SEC Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2004
states:
PATENTS,
TRADEMARKS, LICENSES AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
“Modtech”
is our only registered trademark. We do not have any patents. We hold general
contractors licenses in those states where our activities require such licenses.
These licenses are readily available and renewable annually. We also hold
certain intellectual property in the form of proprietary designs which have
been
approved for modular classroom design by the State of California. These approved
designs and plans are required in order to sell classrooms into the State of
California classroom market and create a short term barrier to entry into the
California classroom market. We estimate that it takes approximately six months
to obtain approval for a new set of plans.
Our
rights in our trademark and proprietary designs are for an indefinite term.
A
review
of Modtech’s financial statements and related filings indicates Modtech accounts
for the plan assets as having an indefinite useful life , and that the plans
are
being accounted for as an intangible not subject to amortization under paragraph
16 of FAS 142.
We
believe this provides further competent evidence supporting the capitalization
of the plans as intangible assets. In addition, in order to be more
conservative, the Company has classified the assets as having a definite life,
subject to annual impairment testing.
We
believe the foregoing fairly responds to the Comments. The Company is prepared
to provide to the staff any additional information required by the staff in
connection with it review.
We
thank
you in advance for your assistance in this matter. Since we are in the process
of preparing our financial statements in connection with the year ended April
30, 2005 to be included in our Annual Report on Fo